Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Aviation General Hospital of Medical University & Beijing Institute of Translational Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburg 15213, PA, USA.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Aug 20;130(16):1926-1931. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.211878.
The current pain assessment methods are strongly subjective and easily affected by outside influences, and there is an urgent need to develop a reliable objective and quantitative pain-monitoring indicator. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using Pain index (Pi) to assess pain symptoms in pain patients.
Subjects were enrolled from patients seeking treatment at Pain Medicine Center of China Medical University Aviation General Hospital from October 2015 to December 2016, such as postherpetic neuralgia, spinal cord injury, femoral head necrosis, lumbar disc herniation, trigeminal neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome, perineal pain, phantom limb pain, etc., (pain group, n = 111), as well as healthy volunteers without subjective pain (control group, n = 100). The subjective pain symptoms in pain patients were evaluated by Pi and visual analogue scale/numerical rating scales (VAS/NRS), respectively, and the relationship between them was analyzed using single factor correlation analysis and multiple factor regression analysis.
Pi levels in the pain group were significantly higher than those of the control group (t = 6.273, P< 0.001), the correlation analysis of Pi and VAS/NRS score in the pain group showed that the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.797 (P < 0.001); After adjusted for types of pain, pain sites, medication, gender, and age, Pi was found to be independently correlated to VAS/NRS score (P < 0.001).
Pi significantly correlates with VAS/NRS score, might be used to evaluate the subjective pain symptoms in patients and has good research and application value as an objective pain assessment tool.
目前的疼痛评估方法主观性强,容易受到外界影响,因此急需开发一种可靠的客观和定量的疼痛监测指标。本研究旨在评估疼痛指数(Pi)用于评估疼痛患者疼痛症状的可行性。
本研究于 2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 12 月期间,连续入选在中国医科大学航空总医院疼痛医学中心就诊的疼痛患者(疼痛组,n=111),包括带状疱疹后神经痛、脊髓损伤、股骨头坏死、腰椎间盘突出症、三叉神经痛、复杂区域疼痛综合征、会阴痛、幻肢痛等,以及无主观疼痛的健康志愿者(对照组,n=100)。分别采用 Pi 和视觉模拟评分/数字评分量表(VAS/NRS)评估疼痛患者的主观疼痛症状,并采用单因素相关分析和多因素回归分析分析两者之间的关系。
疼痛组的 Pi 水平明显高于对照组(t=6.273,P<0.001),疼痛组 Pi 与 VAS/NRS 评分的相关性分析显示,皮尔逊相关系数为 0.797(P<0.001);调整疼痛类型、疼痛部位、用药、性别和年龄后,Pi 与 VAS/NRS 评分仍呈独立相关(P<0.001)。
Pi 与 VAS/NRS 评分显著相关,可用于评估患者的主观疼痛症状,作为一种客观的疼痛评估工具具有良好的研究和应用价值。