Cao Yiping, Raith Meredith R, Smith Paul D, Griffith John F, Weisberg Stephen B, Schriewer Alexander, Sheldon Andrew, Crompton Chris, Amenu Geremew G, Gregory Jason, Guzman Joe, Goodwin Kelly D, Othman Laila, Manasjan Mayela, Choi Samuel, Rapoport Shana, Steele Syreeta, Nguyen Tommy, Yu Xueyuan
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 3535 Harbor Blvd, Suite 110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA.
Weston Solutions, 5817 Dryden Place, Suite 101, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 4;14(8):874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080874.
Host-associated genetic markers that allow for fecal source identification have been used extensively as a diagnostic tool to determine fecal sources within watersheds, but have not been used in routine monitoring to prioritize remediation actions among watersheds. Here, we present a regional assessment of human marker prevalence among drainages that discharge to the U.S. southern California coast. Approximately 50 samples were analyzed for the HF183 human marker from each of 22 southern California coastal drainages under summer dry weather conditions, and another 50 samples were targeted from each of 23 drainages during wet weather. The HF183 marker was ubiquitous, detected in all but two sites in dry weather and at all sites during wet weather. However, there was considerable difference in the extent of human fecal contamination among sites. Similar site ranking was produced regardless of whether the assessment was based on frequency of HF183 detection or site average HF183 concentration. However, site ranking differed greatly between dry and wet weather. Site ranking also differed greatly when based on enterococci, which do not distinguish between pollution sources, vs. HF183, which distinguishes higher risk human fecal sources from other sources, indicating the additional value of the human-associated marker as a routine monitoring tool.
有助于粪便来源识别的宿主相关遗传标记已被广泛用作一种诊断工具,以确定流域内的粪便来源,但尚未用于常规监测,以确定各流域间优先开展的修复行动。在此,我们展示了对排入美国南加州海岸的各排水区域内人类标记物流行情况的一项区域性评估。在夏季干旱天气条件下,对南加州沿海22个排水区域中的每个区域采集的约50份样本进行了HF183人类标记物分析,在潮湿天气期间,又从23个排水区域中的每个区域采集了另外50份样本作为目标样本。HF183标记物普遍存在,在干旱天气下,除两个地点外的所有地点均检测到该标记物,在潮湿天气下,所有地点均检测到该标记物。然而,各地点间人类粪便污染程度存在显著差异。无论评估是基于HF183检测频率还是地点平均HF183浓度,都会产生相似的地点排名。然而,干旱和潮湿天气下的地点排名差异很大。基于无法区分污染源的肠球菌与能将高风险人类粪便来源与其他来源区分开的HF183进行排名时,地点排名也存在很大差异,这表明这种与人类相关的标记物作为一种常规监测工具具有额外价值。