• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对飞行甲板上的突发事件:惊愕和惊讶的概念模型。

Dealing With Unexpected Events on the Flight Deck: A Conceptual Model of Startle and Surprise.

机构信息

Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2017 Dec;59(8):1161-1172. doi: 10.1177/0018720817723428. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1177/0018720817723428
PMID:28777917
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5682572/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A conceptual model is proposed in order to explain pilot performance in surprising and startling situations.

BACKGROUND

Today's debate around loss of control following in-flight events and the implementation of upset prevention and recovery training has highlighted the importance of pilots' ability to deal with unexpected events. Unexpected events, such as technical malfunctions or automation surprises, potentially induce a "startle factor" that may significantly impair performance.

METHOD

Literature on surprise, startle, resilience, and decision making is reviewed, and findings are combined into a conceptual model. A number of recent flight incident and accident cases are then used to illustrate elements of the model.

RESULTS

Pilot perception and actions are conceptualized as being guided by "frames," or mental knowledge structures that were previously learned. Performance issues in unexpected situations can often be traced back to insufficient adaptation of one's frame to the situation. It is argued that such sensemaking or reframing processes are especially vulnerable to issues caused by startle or acute stress.

CONCLUSION

Interventions should focus on (a) increasing the supply and quality of pilot frames (e.g., though practicing a variety of situations), (b) increasing pilot reframing skills (e.g., through the use of unpredictability in training scenarios), and (c) improving pilot metacognitive skills, so that inappropriate automatic responses to startle and surprise can be avoided.

APPLICATION

The model can be used to explain pilot behavior in accident cases, to design experiments and training simulations, to teach pilots metacognitive skills, and to identify intervention methods.

摘要

目的

提出一个概念模型,以解释飞行员在意外和惊吓情况下的表现。

背景

当前,围绕飞行中事件后的失控以及实施颠覆预防和恢复训练的争论凸显了飞行员应对突发事件的能力的重要性。意外事件,如技术故障或自动化意外,可能会产生“惊吓因素”,从而严重影响性能。

方法

回顾关于惊讶、惊吓、恢复力和决策的文献,并将研究结果结合到一个概念模型中。然后,使用一些最近的飞行事故案例来说明模型的要素。

结果

飞行员的感知和行动被概念化为受“框架”或先前学习的心理知识结构的指导。在意外情况下的性能问题通常可以追溯到对其框架与情况的不充分适应。有人认为,这种意义建构或重新框架的过程特别容易受到惊吓或急性应激引起的问题的影响。

结论

干预措施应侧重于(a)增加飞行员框架的供应和质量(例如,通过练习各种情况),(b)提高飞行员重新框架的技能(例如,通过在训练场景中使用不可预测性),以及(c)提高飞行员的元认知技能,从而避免对惊吓和惊讶的不适当自动反应。

应用

该模型可用于解释事故案例中的飞行员行为,设计实验和训练模拟,教授飞行员元认知技能,并确定干预方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f65/5682572/bae3ae3be58d/10.1177_0018720817723428-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f65/5682572/2d2a5efa4c7d/10.1177_0018720817723428-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f65/5682572/bae3ae3be58d/10.1177_0018720817723428-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f65/5682572/2d2a5efa4c7d/10.1177_0018720817723428-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f65/5682572/bae3ae3be58d/10.1177_0018720817723428-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Dealing With Unexpected Events on the Flight Deck: A Conceptual Model of Startle and Surprise.应对飞行甲板上的突发事件:惊愕和惊讶的概念模型。
Hum Factors. 2017 Dec;59(8):1161-1172. doi: 10.1177/0018720817723428. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
2
Training Pilots for Unexpected Events: A Simulator Study on the Advantage of Unpredictable and Variable Scenarios.培训飞行员应对突发事件:关于不可预测和多变情景优势的模拟器研究。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):793-805. doi: 10.1177/0018720818779928. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Responding to an Unexpected In-Flight Event: Physiological Arousal, Information Processing, and Performance.应对突发飞行事件:生理唤醒、信息处理和表现。
Hum Factors. 2020 Aug;62(5):737-750. doi: 10.1177/0018720819854830. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Quick coherence technique facilitating commercial pilots' psychophysiological resilience to the impact of COVID-19.快速连贯技术促进商业飞行员对 COVID-19 影响的心理生理恢复力。
Ergonomics. 2023 Aug;66(8):1176-1189. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2139416. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
5
A Neuroadaptive Cognitive Model for Dealing With Uncertainty in Tracing Pilots' Cognitive State.用于跟踪飞行员认知状态不确定性处理的神经自适应认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul;12(3):1012-1029. doi: 10.1111/tops.12515. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
6
The effectiveness of airline pilot training for abnormal events.航空公司飞行员异常事件培训的有效性。
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):477-85. doi: 10.1177/0018720812466893.
7
Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: an empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data.飞行员在自动化飞行甲板上的监测策略与表现:一项结合行为和眼动追踪数据的实证研究。
Hum Factors. 2007 Jun;49(3):347-57. doi: 10.1518/001872007X196685.
8
Flight deck disturbance management: a simulator study of diagnosis and recovery from breakdowns in pilot-automation coordination.驾驶舱干扰管理:一项关于飞行员与自动化系统协作故障诊断及恢复的模拟研究
Hum Factors. 2007 Aug;49(4):553-63. doi: 10.1518/001872007X215647.
9
[The psychological profile of pilots of passenger planes: Analysis of temperamental traits, aggression and risk].[客机飞行员的心理剖析:气质特征、攻击性及风险分析]
Med Pr. 2017 Jul 26;68(5):639-651. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00444. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
Expertise and responsibility effects on pilots' reactions to flight deck alerts in a simulator.专业技能和责任感对飞行员在模拟器中对驾驶舱警报反应的影响。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Nov;85(11):1100-5. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.4078.2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Generating Flight Illusions Using Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation in Virtual Reality Flight Simulations.在虚拟现实飞行模拟中使用前庭电刺激产生飞行错觉。
Front Neuroergon. 2022 Apr 26;3:883962. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.883962. eCollection 2022.
2
A narrative review of the interconnection between pilot acute stress, startle, and surprise effects in the aviation context: Contribution of physiological measurements.航空环境中飞行员急性应激、惊吓和惊奇效应之间相互联系的叙述性综述:生理测量的贡献
Front Neuroergon. 2023 Feb 23;4:1059476. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1059476. eCollection 2023.
3
Framework and Schema are False Synonyms: Defining Terms to Improve Learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Decisionmaking in practice: The dynamics of muddling through.实践中的决策:渐进决策的动态过程
Appl Ergon. 2017 Sep;63:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 May 4.
2
Flying the Needles: Flight Deck Automation Erodes Fine-Motor Flying Skills Among Airline Pilots.操控指针:驾驶舱自动化削弱了航空公司飞行员的精细运动飞行技能。
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):533-45. doi: 10.1177/0018720816640394. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprise as a metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty.
框架和模式并非同义词:定义术语以促进学习。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jul 28;12(1):294-303. doi: 10.5334/pme.947. eCollection 2023.
4
Orientation Comes First: Becoming Aware of Spatial Disorientation Interferes with Cognitive Performance.方向感为先:意识到空间定向障碍会干扰认知表现。
Hum Factors. 2024 Feb;66(2):377-388. doi: 10.1177/00187208221103931. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Integrating the HFACS Framework and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for In-Flight Startle Causality Analysis.将 HFACS 框架与模糊认知图整合进行飞行中惊跳因果分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;22(3):1068. doi: 10.3390/s22031068.
6
Penguins, Birds, and Pilot Knowledge: Can an Overlooked Attribute of Human Cognition Explain Our Most Puzzling Aircraft Accidents?企鹅、鸟类和飞行员知识:人类认知中被忽视的属性能否解释我们最令人费解的飞机事故?
Hum Factors. 2022 Jun;64(4):662-674. doi: 10.1177/0018720820960877. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
The Unease Modulation Model: An Experiential Model of Stress With Implications for Health, Stress Management, and Public Policy.不安调节模型:一种压力体验模型及其对健康、压力管理和公共政策的启示
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 7;10:379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00379. eCollection 2019.
8
Training Pilots for Unexpected Events: A Simulator Study on the Advantage of Unpredictable and Variable Scenarios.培训飞行员应对突发事件:关于不可预测和多变情景优势的模拟器研究。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):793-805. doi: 10.1177/0018720818779928. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
A Machine Learning Approach to the Detection of Pilot's Reaction to Unexpected Events Based on EEG Signals.基于脑电信号的飞行员对突发事件反应检测的机器学习方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Apr 10;2018:2703513. doi: 10.1155/2018/2703513. eCollection 2018.
为何有些惊喜比其他惊喜更令人惊讶:作为一种对解释难度的元认知感受的惊喜。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Sep;81:74-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
4
The effectiveness of airline pilot training for abnormal events.航空公司飞行员异常事件培训的有效性。
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):477-85. doi: 10.1177/0018720812466893.
5
Anxiety and perceptual-motor performance: toward an integrated model of concepts, mechanisms, and processes.焦虑与感知运动表现:走向概念、机制和过程的综合模型。
Psychol Res. 2012 Nov;76(6):747-59. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0384-x. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
6
Identifying black swans in NextGen: predicting human performance in off-nominal conditions.识别下一代的黑天鹅:预测非正常状态下的人类表现。
Hum Factors. 2009 Oct;51(5):638-51. doi: 10.1177/0018720809349709.
7
Natural selective attention: orienting and emotion.自然选择性注意:定向与情绪。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Jan;46(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00702.x. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
8
Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory.焦虑与认知表现:注意力控制理论
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.
9
Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system.人为失误与商业航空事故:基于人为因素分析与分类系统的分析
Hum Factors. 2007 Apr;49(2):227-42. doi: 10.1518/001872007X312469.
10
Expressive suppression during an acoustic startle.在听觉惊吓过程中的表达抑制。
Psychophysiology. 2006 Jan;43(1):104-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00382.x.