• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争风险数据的组内和组间变量选择

Group and within-group variable selection for competing risks data.

作者信息

Ahn Kwang Woo, Banerjee Anjishnu, Sahr Natasha, Kim Soyoung

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.

出版信息

Lifetime Data Anal. 2018 Jul;24(3):407-424. doi: 10.1007/s10985-017-9400-9. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10985-017-9400-9
PMID:28779228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5797529/
Abstract

Variable selection in the presence of grouped variables is troublesome for competing risks data: while some recent methods deal with group selection only, simultaneous selection of both groups and within-group variables remains largely unexplored. In this context, we propose an adaptive group bridge method, enabling simultaneous selection both within and between groups, for competing risks data. The adaptive group bridge is applicable to independent and clustered data. It also allows the number of variables to diverge as the sample size increases. We show that our new method possesses excellent asymptotic properties, including variable selection consistency at group and within-group levels. We also show superior performance in simulated and real data sets over several competing approaches, including group bridge, adaptive group lasso, and AIC / BIC-based methods.

摘要

在存在分组变量的情况下,竞争风险数据的变量选择很麻烦:虽然最近的一些方法仅处理组选择,但组和组内变量的同时选择在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在这种情况下,我们提出了一种自适应组桥方法,用于竞争风险数据,可以同时在组内和组间进行选择。自适应组桥适用于独立数据和聚类数据。它还允许变量数量随着样本量的增加而发散。我们表明,我们的新方法具有出色的渐近性质,包括组和组内水平的变量选择一致性。我们还表明,在模拟数据集和真实数据集中,我们的方法比几种竞争方法表现更优,包括组桥、自适应组套索和基于AIC / BIC的方法。

相似文献

1
Group and within-group variable selection for competing risks data.竞争风险数据的组内和组间变量选择
Lifetime Data Anal. 2018 Jul;24(3):407-424. doi: 10.1007/s10985-017-9400-9. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
2
Variable selection with group structure in competing risks quantile regression.具有竞争风险分位数回归中组结构的变量选择。
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 30;37(9):1577-1586. doi: 10.1002/sim.7619. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Penalized variable selection for cause-specific hazard frailty models with clustered competing-risks data.基于聚类竞争风险数据的有向风险脆弱性模型的惩罚变量选择。
Stat Med. 2021 Dec 20;40(29):6541-6557. doi: 10.1002/sim.9197. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression.竞争风险回归中的惩罚变量选择
Lifetime Data Anal. 2017 Jul;23(3):353-376. doi: 10.1007/s10985-016-9362-3. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
5
Sample size calculations in the presence of competing risks.存在竞争风险时的样本量计算。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5370-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.3114.
6
Bi-level variable selection for case-cohort studies with group variables.基于群组变量的病例-对照研究的双层变量选择。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):3404-3414. doi: 10.1177/0962280218803654. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
Linear and nonlinear variable selection in competing risks data.线性和非线性变量选择在竞争风险数据中。
Stat Med. 2018 Jun 15;37(13):2134-2147. doi: 10.1002/sim.7637. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
Variable selection in subdistribution hazard frailty models with competing risks data.具有竞争风险数据的子分布风险脆弱性模型中的变量选择
Stat Med. 2014 Nov 20;33(26):4590-604. doi: 10.1002/sim.6257. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
9
Comparison of variable selection methods for high-dimensional survival data with competing events.高维生存数据中存在竞争事件时的变量选择方法比较。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Dec 1;91:159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
10
Model selection in competing risks regression.竞争风险回归中的模型选择。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 15;32(18):3077-88. doi: 10.1002/sim.5762. Epub 2013 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Joint Screening for Ultra-High Dimensional Multi-Omics Data.超高维多组学数据的联合筛选
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;11(12):1193. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121193.
2
High-Dimensional Survival Analysis: Methods and Applications.高维生存分析:方法与应用
Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2023 Mar;10(1):25-49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-032921-022127. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Scalable Algorithms for Large Competing Risks Data.适用于大量竞争风险数据的可扩展算法
J Comput Graph Stat. 2021;30(3):685-693. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2020.1841650. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Risk Factor Identification in Heterogeneous Disease Progression with L1-Regularized Multi-state Models.使用L1正则化多状态模型识别异质性疾病进展中的风险因素
J Healthc Inform Res. 2021 Jan 4;5(1):20-53. doi: 10.1007/s41666-020-00085-1. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Optimal treatment regimes for competing risk data using doubly robust outcome weighted learning with bi-level variable selection.使用具有双层变量选择的双重稳健结果加权学习法处理竞争风险数据的最优治疗方案
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2021 Jun;158. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2021.107167. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
Nonparametric competing risks analysis using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.贝叶斯加法回归树在非参数竞争风险分析中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):57-77. doi: 10.1177/0962280218822140. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
Bi-level variable selection for case-cohort studies with group variables.基于群组变量的病例-对照研究的双层变量选择。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):3404-3414. doi: 10.1177/0962280218803654. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Donor and recipient sex in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: what really matters.异基因干细胞移植中供受者性别:究竟什么才是重要的
Haematologica. 2016 Oct;101(10):1260-1266. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.147645. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
2
Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression.竞争风险回归中的惩罚变量选择
Lifetime Data Anal. 2017 Jul;23(3):353-376. doi: 10.1007/s10985-016-9362-3. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
3
Antilymphocyte Globulin for Prevention of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.抗淋巴细胞球蛋白预防慢性移植物抗宿主病。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):43-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506002.
4
The impact of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.移植物抗宿主病预防措施对急性髓系白血病减低剂量预处理异基因造血干细胞移植的影响:欧洲血液与骨髓移植组急性白血病工作组的一项研究
Haematologica. 2015 May;100(5):683-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.119339. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
5
Variable selection in subdistribution hazard frailty models with competing risks data.具有竞争风险数据的子分布风险脆弱性模型中的变量选择
Stat Med. 2014 Nov 20;33(26):4590-604. doi: 10.1002/sim.6257. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
6
VARIABLE SELECTION FOR CENSORED QUANTILE REGRESION.删失分位数回归的变量选择
Stat Sin. 2013 Jan 1;23(1):145-167. doi: 10.5705/ss.2011.100.
7
Model selection in competing risks regression.竞争风险回归中的模型选择。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 15;32(18):3077-88. doi: 10.1002/sim.5762. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
8
Competing risks regression for clustered data. 群组数据的竞争风险回归。
Biostatistics. 2012 Jul;13(3):371-83. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr032. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
9
Outcomes of pediatric bone marrow transplantation for leukemia and myelodysplasia using matched sibling, mismatched related, or matched unrelated donors.采用匹配同胞供者、非亲缘相关供者或匹配无关供者进行小儿骨髓移植治疗白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征的结果。
Blood. 2010 Nov 11;116(19):4007-15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-261958. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
10
Marginal models for clustered time-to-event data with competing risks using pseudovalues.使用伪值对具有竞争风险的聚类事件发生时间数据的边际模型。
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01416.x.