• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用伪值对具有竞争风险的聚类事件发生时间数据的边际模型。

Marginal models for clustered time-to-event data with competing risks using pseudovalues.

作者信息

Logan Brent R, Zhang Mei-Jie, Klein John P

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01416.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01416.x
PMID:20377579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2902638/
Abstract

Many time-to-event studies are complicated by the presence of competing risks and by nesting of individuals within a cluster, such as patients in the same center in a multicenter study. Several methods have been proposed for modeling the cumulative incidence function with independent observations. However, when subjects are clustered, one needs to account for the presence of a cluster effect either through frailty modeling of the hazard or subdistribution hazard, or by adjusting for the within-cluster correlation in a marginal model. We propose a method for modeling the marginal cumulative incidence function directly. We compute leave-one-out pseudo-observations from the cumulative incidence function at several time points. These are used in a generalized estimating equation to model the marginal cumulative incidence curve, and obtain consistent estimates of the model parameters. A sandwich variance estimator is derived to adjust for the within-cluster correlation. The method is easy to implement using standard software once the pseudovalues are obtained, and is a generalization of several existing models. Simulation studies show that the method works well to adjust the SE for the within-cluster correlation. We illustrate the method on a dataset looking at outcomes after bone marrow transplantation.

摘要

许多生存时间研究因存在竞争风险以及个体嵌套于群组中(如多中心研究中同一中心的患者)而变得复杂。针对具有独立观测值的累积发病率函数建模,已提出了几种方法。然而,当研究对象存在聚类时,需要通过对风险或子分布风险进行脆弱性建模,或者在边际模型中对聚类内相关性进行调整,来考虑聚类效应的存在。我们提出了一种直接对边际累积发病率函数进行建模的方法。我们在几个时间点从累积发病率函数计算留一法伪观测值。这些伪观测值用于广义估计方程中,以对边际累积发病率曲线进行建模,并获得模型参数的一致估计。我们推导了一个三明治方差估计量,以调整聚类内相关性。一旦获得伪值,该方法使用标准软件很容易实现,并且是对几种现有模型的推广。模拟研究表明,该方法能很好地针对聚类内相关性调整标准误。我们在一个观察骨髓移植后结局的数据集上展示了该方法。

相似文献

1
Marginal models for clustered time-to-event data with competing risks using pseudovalues.使用伪值对具有竞争风险的聚类事件发生时间数据的边际模型。
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01416.x.
2
A positive stable frailty model for clustered failure time data with covariate-dependent frailty.一种用于具有协变量依赖脆弱性的聚类失效时间数据的正稳定脆弱性模型。
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):8-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01444.x.
3
Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function.基于累积发病率函数伪值的竞争风险数据回归建模
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):223-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031209.x.
4
Competing risks regression for clustered data. 群组数据的竞争风险回归。
Biostatistics. 2012 Jul;13(3):371-83. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr032. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
5
Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring.左截断和右删失情况下特定病因累积发病率估计及精细灰色模型
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):39-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01420.x.
6
Testing for center effects on survival and competing risks outcomes using pseudo-value regression.使用伪值回归检验中心效应在生存和竞争风险结果方面的影响。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2019 Apr;25(2):206-228. doi: 10.1007/s10985-018-9443-6. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
7
Dynamic pseudo-observations: a robust approach to dynamic prediction in competing risks.动态伪观测值:竞争风险中动态预测的一种稳健方法。
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):1043-52. doi: 10.1111/biom.12061. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
8
Proportional hazards regression for the analysis of clustered survival data from case-cohort studies.用于病例队列研究中聚类生存数据分析的比例风险回归。
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01445.x.
9
Semiparametric competing risks regression under interval censoring using the R package intccr.使用 R 包 intccr 进行区间 censoring 下的半参数竞争风险回归。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 May;173:167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Modeling clustered long-term survivors using marginal mixture cure model.使用边际混合治愈模型对聚集性长期幸存者进行建模。
Biom J. 2018 Jul;60(4):780-796. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700114. Epub 2018 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Competing risks regression for clustered data with covariate-dependent censoring.具有协变量依赖删失的聚类数据的竞争风险回归
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2025;54(4):1081-1099. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2329771. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
2
Adjusted curves for clustered survival and competing risks data.聚类生存和竞争风险数据的调整曲线。
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2025;54(1):120-143. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2023.2245583. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
3
Differential network connectivity analysis for microbiome data adjusted for clinical covariates using jackknife pseudo-values.

本文引用的文献

1
The Kaplan-Meier Estimator as an Inverse-Probability-of-Censoring Weighted Average.作为删失逆概率加权平均值的Kaplan-Meier估计量
Am Stat. 2001;55(3):207-210. doi: 10.1198/000313001317098185. Epub 2012 Jan 1.
2
On pseudo-values for regression analysis in competing risks models.关于竞争风险模型中回归分析的伪值
Lifetime Data Anal. 2009 Jun;15(2):241-55. doi: 10.1007/s10985-008-9107-z. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
3
SAS and R functions to compute pseudo-values for censored data regression.用于计算删失数据回归伪值的SAS和R函数。
基于 Jackknife 伪值调整临床协变量的微生物组数据的差异网络连通性分析。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2024 Mar 18;25(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05689-7.
4
PRANA: an R package for differential co-expression network analysis with the presence of additional covariates.PRANA:一个用于存在附加协变量的差异共表达网络分析的 R 包。
BMC Genomics. 2023 Nov 16;24(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09787-3.
5
Adjusting for informative cluster size in pseudo-value-based regression approaches with clustered time to event data.调整基于伪值的回归方法中具有聚类时间到事件数据的信息聚类大小。
Stat Med. 2023 Jun 15;42(13):2162-2178. doi: 10.1002/sim.9716. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
6
Simulating time-to-event data subject to competing risks and clustering: A review and synthesis.模拟受竞争风险和聚类影响的事件发生时间数据:综述与综合分析
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):305-333. doi: 10.1177/09622802221136067. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
7
Marginal semiparametric transformation models for clustered multivariate competing risks data.边缘半参数转换模型在聚类多元竞争风险数据中的应用。
Stat Med. 2022 Nov 20;41(26):5349-5364. doi: 10.1002/sim.9573. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
8
Regression modeling of restricted mean survival time for left-truncated right-censored data.左截断右删失数据的限制平均生存时间的回归建模。
Stat Med. 2022 Jul 20;41(16):3003-3021. doi: 10.1002/sim.9399. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
9
A comparison of statistical methods to predict the residual lifetime risk.统计方法预测剩余寿命风险的比较。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;37(2):173-194. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00815-8. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
10
Optimal treatment regimes for competing risk data using doubly robust outcome weighted learning with bi-level variable selection.使用具有双层变量选择的双重稳健结果加权学习法处理竞争风险数据的最优治疗方案
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2021 Jun;158. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2021.107167. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 Mar;89(3):289-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.11.017. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
4
Competing risks analysis of correlated failure time data.相关失效时间数据的竞争风险分析
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):172-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00868.x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
5
Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time.在固定时间点分析生存曲线。
Stat Med. 2007 Oct 30;26(24):4505-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.2864.
6
Analysing multicentre competing risks data with a mixed proportional hazards model for the subdistribution.使用亚分布的混合比例风险模型分析多中心竞争风险数据。
Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4267-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.2684.
7
Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function.基于累积发病率函数伪值的竞争风险数据回归建模
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):223-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031209.x.
8
Score test of homogeneity for survival data.生存数据的齐性得分检验。
Lifetime Data Anal. 1995;1(2):145-56; discussion 157-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00985764.