Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University.
Psychol Assess. 2018 May;30(5):669-677. doi: 10.1037/pas0000515. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
This study provides evidence regarding the relatedness of multi-informant agreement and perceived observability of internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors. Based on 2 distinct but comparable samples of children/adolescents (Sample 1: 58.2% female and mean age of 12.51 years; Sample 2: 56.4% female and mean age of 12.35 years) and their mothers, cross-sectional as well as longitudinal analyses were conducted. Although often suggested in the literature, the results of the study do not indicate that-in general-internalizing behavior is less observable than externalizing behavior. Moreover, the results do not corroborate the suggestion that multi-informant agreement regarding internalizing behavior is lower than that of externalizing behavior. However, apart from the broad distinction of internalizing versus externalizing behavior, observability and multi-informant agreement are positively correlated with respect to reports on actual state (cross-sectional) as well as change (longitudinal) of problem behavior. The results are discussed in the context of research on multi-informant reports on problem behavior and with respect to practical implications for the assessment of problem behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究提供了有关多信息源一致性与内隐和外显问题行为可观察性之间关系的证据。基于两个不同但可比的儿童/青少年样本(样本 1:女性占 58.2%,平均年龄为 12.51 岁;样本 2:女性占 56.4%,平均年龄为 12.35 岁)及其母亲,进行了横断面和纵向分析。尽管在文献中经常被提及,但研究结果并不表明——一般来说——内隐行为比外显行为更难观察。此外,研究结果也不支持这样一种观点,即内隐行为的多信息源一致性低于外显行为。然而,除了内隐和外显行为的广泛区分之外,在问题行为的实际状态(横断面)和变化(纵向)的报告中,可观察性和多信息源一致性是正相关的。研究结果在关于问题行为的多信息源报告的研究背景下进行了讨论,并考虑了对问题行为评估的实际意义。