University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, CC72, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 10;79(4):17m11484. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11484.
The aim of this study was to determine the relative importance of self-, parent-, and teacher-reported problem behavior for initial specialist mental health care use in adolescence and the extent to which the relative importance of each informant changes over time.
Data from the Dutch community-based cohort study TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) were linked to administrative records of specialist mental health care organizations. Self-, parent-, and teacher-reported internalizing and externalizing problems were assessed at ages 11, 13, and 16 years, with self-reported problems also assessed at age 19 years. The study included 1,478 adolescents, of whom 19.8% had administrative records between January 2000 (age 9 years) and December 2011 (age 21 years).
After effects of internalizing and externalizing problems were adjusted for each other and for sociodemographic correlates, internalizing problems, but not externalizing problems, predicted initial specialist mental health care use. Teacher reports mainly predicted initial specialist care between the ages of 11 and 13 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-2.02; P < .001), parent reports mainly predicted initial specialist care between the ages of 13 and 16 years (HR = 1.47; 95% CI, = 1.13-1.91; P = .004), and self-reports mainly predicted initial specialist care between the ages of 16 and 19 years (HR = 1.61; 95% CI, = 1.25-2.08; P < .001) and between the ages 19 and 21 years (HR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.10-2.05; P = .011).
Teachers, parents, and adolescents are the driving force behind initial specialist care at consecutive phases in adolescence. Future research should assess whether improving the problem recognition of teachers in secondary education and educating young adults about mental health problems are effective ways of reducing the treatment gap.
本研究旨在确定青少年初次专科心理健康治疗中,自我报告、父母报告和教师报告的问题行为的相对重要性,以及每个报告者的相对重要性随时间的变化程度。
这项研究的数据来自荷兰基于社区的青少年个体生活追踪研究(TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey,TRAILS),并与专科心理健康治疗组织的管理记录相关联。11、13 和 16 岁时评估自我报告、父母报告和教师报告的内化和外化问题,19 岁时自我报告也评估这些问题。该研究纳入了 1478 名青少年,其中 19.8%的人在 2000 年 1 月(9 岁)至 2011 年 12 月(21 岁)期间有管理记录。
在相互调整了内化和外化问题的影响,并调整了社会人口学相关因素后,内化问题而非外化问题预测了初次专科心理健康治疗的使用。教师报告主要在 11 至 13 岁之间预测初次专科护理(危险比[HR] = 1.57;95%置信区间[CI],1.22-2.02;P<.001),父母报告主要在 13 至 16 岁之间预测初次专科护理(HR = 1.47;95% CI,1.13-1.91;P =.004),而自我报告主要在 16 至 19 岁之间预测初次专科护理(HR = 1.61;95% CI,1.25-2.08;P<.001)和 19 至 21 岁之间预测初次专科护理(HR = 1.50;95% CI,1.10-2.05;P =.011)。
教师、父母和青少年是青少年连续阶段初次专科治疗的驱动力。未来的研究应评估提高中学教育中教师对问题的识别能力和对年轻人进行心理健康问题教育是否是减少治疗差距的有效方法。