Dhakal Krishna P, Chevalier Lizette R
Environmental Resources and Policy, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA.
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Dec 1;203(Pt 1):171-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Green infrastructure (GI) revitalizes vegetation and soil, restores hydro-ecological processes destroyed by traditional urbanization, and naturally manages stormwater on-site, offering numerous sustainability benefits. However, despite being sustainable and despite being the object of unrelenting expert advocacy for more than two decades, GI implementation remains slow. On the other hand, the practice of traditional gray infrastructure, which is known to have significant adverse impacts on the environment, is still ubiquitous in urban areas throughout the world. This relationship between knowledge and practice seems unaccountable, which has not yet received adequate attention from academia, policy makers, or research communities. We deal with this problem in this paper. The specific objective of the paper is to explore the barriers to GI, and suggest policies that can both overcome these barriers and expedite implementation. By surveying the status of implementation in 10 US cities and assessing the relevant city, state and federal policies, we identified 29 barriers and grouped them into 5 categories. The findings show that most of the barriers stem from cognitive limitations and socio-institutional arrangements. Accordingly, we suggest 33 policies, also grouped into 5 categories, which span from conducting public education and awareness programs to changing policies and governance structures.
绿色基础设施(GI)能使植被和土壤恢复生机,修复被传统城市化破坏的水文生态过程,并在现场自然管理雨水,带来诸多可持续发展效益。然而,尽管绿色基础设施具有可持续性,且二十多年来一直是专家们不懈倡导的对象,但其实施进展仍然缓慢。另一方面,传统灰色基础设施的做法对环境有重大不利影响,却在世界各地的城市地区仍然普遍存在。这种知识与实践之间的关系似乎难以解释,尚未得到学术界、政策制定者或研究团体的充分关注。我们在本文中探讨这一问题。本文的具体目标是探究绿色基础设施的障碍,并提出既能克服这些障碍又能加快实施的政策。通过调查美国10个城市的实施状况并评估相关的城市、州和联邦政策,我们确定了29个障碍,并将它们分为5类。研究结果表明,大多数障碍源于认知局限和社会制度安排。因此,我们提出了33项政策,也分为5类,涵盖从开展公众教育和提高意识项目到改变政策和治理结构等方面。