1 KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
2 AP University College Antwerp, Belgium.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1215-1225. doi: 10.1177/0269215517692641. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
To explore the reliability and feasibility of electronic visual analogue scales in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy individuals.
Cross-sectional observational study Setting: Clinical setting Subjects: Convenience sample of 52 people with MS and 52 matched healthy controls Interventions: NA Main measures: Participants scored 15 statements assessing fatigue, pain, anxiety and quality of life on an electronic visual analogue scale (eVAS), either using a smartphone or a tablet (randomly allocated). To check for test-retest reliability, statements were administered in two separate randomly ordered groups. Subjects completed a feasibility questionnaire.
Mean (SD) eVAS scores ranged from 35 (28.1) to 80 (22.1) in MS group, and from 57 (28.0) to 86 (13.2) in controls. Intra Class Correlations ranged from 0.73 to 0.95 in MS sample; 0.61 to 0.92 in controls. For most statements, Bland-Altman plots indicated no systematic error, but relatively large random error of the eVAS scores (exceeding 20mm). Considerable ceiling effects (i.e. better health) were found in healthy controls. Similar reliability was found among smartphone or tablet, different demographic groups and the experience-groups.
Electronic visual analogue scales are reliable and useful for people with MS to register fatigue, pain, anxiety and quality of life.
探索电子视觉模拟量表在多发性硬化症(MS)患者和健康个体中的可靠性和可行性。
横断面观察性研究
临床环境
52 名多发性硬化症患者和 52 名匹配的健康对照者的便利样本
无
参与者使用智能手机或平板电脑(随机分配)对 15 个评估疲劳、疼痛、焦虑和生活质量的陈述在电子视觉模拟量表(eVAS)上进行评分。为了检查测试-重测信度,陈述以两个独立的随机顺序组进行管理。受试者完成了一份可行性问卷。
MS 组的平均(标准差)eVAS 评分范围为 35(28.1)至 80(22.1),对照组为 57(28.0)至 86(13.2)。MS 样本的组内相关系数范围为 0.73 至 0.95;对照组为 0.61 至 0.92。对于大多数陈述,Bland-Altman 图表明没有系统误差,但 eVAS 评分的随机误差较大(超过 20mm)。健康对照组发现明显的天花板效应(即更好的健康状况)。智能手机或平板电脑、不同的人口统计学群体和经验群体之间存在相似的可靠性。
电子视觉模拟量表对于多发性硬化症患者来说是可靠且有用的,可以用于登记疲劳、疼痛、焦虑和生活质量。