Suppr超能文献

测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度。

Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Chipchase S Y, Lincoln N B, Radford K A

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, UK.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Jul 22;25(14):778-84. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000093477.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare methods of assessing fatigue.

DESIGN

Cross sectional.

SETTING

Community.

SUBJECTS

Forty Multile Sclerosis (MS) patients and 20 healthy controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fatigue questionnaires, SDSA dot cancellation test, finger tapping test, TEA Lottery.

RESULTS

The MS patients had significantly higher levels of fatigue than the controls on the Task Induced Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale and Fatigue Impact Scale. The Task Induced Fatigue Scale completed whilst imagining oneself driving and the Fatigue Assessment Instrument did not differentiate between MS patients and controls. Finger tapping differentiated between MS patients and controls but there was no significant difference between MS patients and controls on visual and auditory concentration tests. A factor analysis indicated that questionnaire measures of fatigue were interrelated but independent of objective test performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Questionnaire measures can be used to assess fatigue in people with MS. The FSS differentiated MS patients from controls and is relatively short. It was therefore recommended for clinical use.

摘要

目的

比较评估疲劳的方法。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

社区。

研究对象

40名多发性硬化症(MS)患者和20名健康对照者。

主要观察指标

疲劳问卷、SDSA点消除试验、手指敲击试验、TEA抽签。

结果

在任务诱发疲劳量表、疲劳严重程度量表和疲劳影响量表上,MS患者的疲劳水平显著高于对照组。在想象自己开车时完成的任务诱发疲劳量表和疲劳评估工具未能区分MS患者和对照组。手指敲击试验能够区分MS患者和对照组,但在视觉和听觉注意力测试中,MS患者和对照组之间没有显著差异。因素分析表明,疲劳的问卷测量方法相互关联,但与客观测试表现无关。

结论

问卷测量方法可用于评估MS患者的疲劳。疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)能够区分MS患者和对照组,且相对较短。因此,推荐在临床中使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验