Chipchase S Y, Lincoln N B, Radford K A
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, UK.
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Jul 22;25(14):778-84. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000093477.
To compare methods of assessing fatigue.
Cross sectional.
Community.
Forty Multile Sclerosis (MS) patients and 20 healthy controls.
Fatigue questionnaires, SDSA dot cancellation test, finger tapping test, TEA Lottery.
The MS patients had significantly higher levels of fatigue than the controls on the Task Induced Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale and Fatigue Impact Scale. The Task Induced Fatigue Scale completed whilst imagining oneself driving and the Fatigue Assessment Instrument did not differentiate between MS patients and controls. Finger tapping differentiated between MS patients and controls but there was no significant difference between MS patients and controls on visual and auditory concentration tests. A factor analysis indicated that questionnaire measures of fatigue were interrelated but independent of objective test performance.
Questionnaire measures can be used to assess fatigue in people with MS. The FSS differentiated MS patients from controls and is relatively short. It was therefore recommended for clinical use.
比较评估疲劳的方法。
横断面研究。
社区。
40名多发性硬化症(MS)患者和20名健康对照者。
疲劳问卷、SDSA点消除试验、手指敲击试验、TEA抽签。
在任务诱发疲劳量表、疲劳严重程度量表和疲劳影响量表上,MS患者的疲劳水平显著高于对照组。在想象自己开车时完成的任务诱发疲劳量表和疲劳评估工具未能区分MS患者和对照组。手指敲击试验能够区分MS患者和对照组,但在视觉和听觉注意力测试中,MS患者和对照组之间没有显著差异。因素分析表明,疲劳的问卷测量方法相互关联,但与客观测试表现无关。
问卷测量方法可用于评估MS患者的疲劳。疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)能够区分MS患者和对照组,且相对较短。因此,推荐在临床中使用。