Bucke Jonathan, Spencer Simon, Fawcett Louise, Sonvico Lawrence, Rushton Alison, Heneghan Nicola R
English Institute of Sport, Shropshire, United Kingdom.
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
J Athl Train. 2017 Sep;52(9):820-825. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.6.05. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
Spinal axial rotation is required for many functional and sporting activities. Eighty percent of axial rotation occurs in the thoracic spine. Existing measures of thoracic spine rotation commonly involve laboratory equipment, use a seated position, and include lumbar motion. A simple performance-based outcome measure would allow clinicians to evaluate isolated thoracic spine rotation. Currently, no valid measure exists.
To explore the criterion and concurrent validity of a digital inclinometer (DI) and iPhone Clinometer app (iPhone) for measuring thoracic spine rotation using the heel-sit position.
Controlled laboratory study.
University laboratory.
A total of 23 asymptomatic healthy participants (14 men, 9 women; age = 25.82 ± 4.28 years, height = 170.26 ± 8.01 cm, mass = 67.50 ± 9.46 kg, body mass index = 23.26 ± 2.79) were recruited from a student population.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We took DI and iPhone measurements of thoracic spine rotation in the heel-sit position concurrently with dual-motion analysis (laboratory measure) and ultrasound imaging of the underlying bony tissue motion (reference standard). To determine the criterion and concurrent validity, we used the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r, 2 tailed) and Bland-Altman plots.
The DI (r = 0.88, P < .001) and iPhone (r = 0.88, P < .001) demonstrated strong criterion validity. Both also had strong concurrent validity (r = 0.98, P < .001). Bland-Altman plots illustrated mean differences of 5.82° (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20.37°, -8.73°) and 4.94° (95% CI = 19.23°, -9.35°) between the DI and iPhone, respectively, and the reference standard and 0.87° (95% CI = 6.79°, -5.05°) between the DI and iPhone.
The DI and iPhone provided valid measures of thoracic spine rotation in the heel-sit position. Both can be used in clinical practice to assess thoracic spine rotation, which may be valuable when evaluating thoracic dysfunction.
许多功能活动和体育活动都需要脊柱进行轴向旋转。80%的轴向旋转发生在胸椎。现有的胸椎旋转测量方法通常需要实验室设备,采用坐姿,且包括腰椎运动。一种基于简单表现的结果测量方法将使临床医生能够评估孤立的胸椎旋转。目前,尚无有效的测量方法。
探讨数字倾角仪(DI)和iPhone测斜仪应用程序(iPhone)在足跟坐姿势下测量胸椎旋转的标准效度和同时效度。
对照实验室研究。
大学实验室。
从学生群体中招募了23名无症状健康参与者(14名男性,9名女性;年龄=25.82±4.28岁,身高=170.26±8.01厘米,体重=67.50±9.46千克,体重指数=23.26±2.79)。
我们在足跟坐姿势下同时使用DI和iPhone测量胸椎旋转,并与双运动分析(实验室测量)以及下方骨组织运动的超声成像(参考标准)进行对比。为了确定标准效度和同时效度,我们使用了Pearson积矩相关系数(r,双侧)和Bland-Altman图。
DI(r = 0.88,P <.001)和iPhone(r = 0.88,P <.001)显示出很强的标准效度。两者也都具有很强的同时效度(r = 0.98,P <.001)。Bland-Altman图显示,DI与iPhone之间、参考标准与DI和iPhone之间的平均差异分别为5.82°(95%置信区间[CI]=20.37°,-8.73°)、4.94°(95%CI = 19.23°,-9.35°)和0.87°(95%CI = 6.79°,-5.05°)。
DI和iPhone在足跟坐姿势下提供了有效的胸椎旋转测量方法。两者均可用于临床实践中评估胸椎旋转,这在评估胸椎功能障碍时可能很有价值。