• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知风格对导航环境学习与检索的影响。

Effect of Cognitive Style on Learning and Retrieval of Navigational Environments.

作者信息

Boccia Maddalena, Vecchione Francesca, Piccardi Laura, Guariglia Cecilia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of RomeRome, Italy.

Cognitive and Motor Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Santa Lucia (IRCCS)Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 25;8:496. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00496. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2017.00496
PMID:28790920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5524881/
Abstract

Field independence (FI) has been found to correlate with a wide range of cognitive processes requiring cognitive restructuring. Cognitive restructuring, that is going beyond the information given by the setting, is pivotal in creating stable mental representations of the environment, the so-called "cognitive maps," and it affects visuo-spatial abilities underpinning environmental navigation. Here we evaluated whether FI, by fostering cognitive restructuring of environmental cues on the basis of an internal frame of reference, affects the learning and retrieval of a novel environment. Fifty-four participants were submitted to the Embedded Figure Test (EFT) for assessing their Cognitive Style (CS) and to the Perspective Taking/Spatial Orientation Test (PTSOT) and the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale (SBSOD) for assessing their spatial perspective taking and orientation skills. They were also required to learn a path in a novel, real environment (route learning, RL), to recognize landmarks of this path among distracters (landmark recognition, LR), to order them (landmark ordering, LO) and to draw the learned path on a map (map drawing, MD). Retrieval tasks were performed both immediately after learning (immediate-retrieval) and the day after (24 h-retrieval). Performances on EFT significantly correlated with the time needed to learn the path, with MD (both in the immediate- and in the 24 h- retrievals), results on LR (in 24-retrieval) and performances on PTSOT. Interestingly, we found that gender interacted with CS on RL (time of learning) and MD. Females performed significantly worse than males only if they were classified as FD, but did not differ from males if they were classified as FI. These results suggest that CS affects learning and retrieval of navigational environment, especially when a map-like representation is required. We propose that CS may be pivotal in forming the cognitive map of the environment, likely due to the higher ability of FI individuals in restructuring environmental cues in a global and flexible long-term representation of the environment.

摘要

研究发现,场独立性(FI)与一系列需要认知重构的认知过程相关。认知重构,即超越情境所提供的信息,对于创建环境的稳定心理表征(即所谓的“认知地图”)至关重要,并且它会影响支撑环境导航的视觉空间能力。在此,我们评估了FI是否通过基于内部参照框架促进对环境线索的认知重构,从而影响对新环境的学习和记忆提取。54名参与者接受了镶嵌图形测验(EFT)以评估他们的认知风格(CS),以及接受了观点采择/空间定向测验(PTSOT)和圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSOD)以评估他们的空间观点采择和定向技能。他们还被要求在一个新的真实环境中学习一条路径(路径学习,RL),在干扰物中识别这条路径的地标(地标识别,LR),对它们进行排序(地标排序,LO),并在地图上画出所学路径(地图绘制,MD)。记忆提取任务在学习后立即(即时记忆提取)和第二天(24小时记忆提取)进行。EFT的表现与学习路径所需的时间、MD(即时和24小时记忆提取)、LR的结果(24小时记忆提取)以及PTSOT的表现显著相关。有趣的是,我们发现性别在RL(学习时间)和MD上与CS存在交互作用。仅当女性被归类为场依存型(FD)时,她们的表现显著比男性差,但如果她们被归类为场独立型(FI),则与男性没有差异。这些结果表明,认知风格会影响导航环境的学习和记忆提取,特别是在需要类似地图表征的情况下。我们认为,认知风格可能在形成环境的认知地图中起关键作用,这可能是由于场独立型个体在以全局和灵活的长期环境表征重构环境线索方面具有更高的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/5524881/61d4c7578203/fphar-08-00496-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/5524881/b54c9d07c518/fphar-08-00496-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/5524881/61d4c7578203/fphar-08-00496-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/5524881/b54c9d07c518/fphar-08-00496-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/5524881/61d4c7578203/fphar-08-00496-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Cognitive Style on Learning and Retrieval of Navigational Environments.认知风格对导航环境学习与检索的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 25;8:496. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00496. eCollection 2017.
2
Restructuring the navigational field: individual predisposition towards field independence predicts preferred navigational strategy.重构导航领域:个体对场独立性的倾向预示着偏好的导航策略。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jun;235(6):1741-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4936-1. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence.场独立性能否预测支撑人类导航的视觉空间能力?行为学证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4682-9. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Different Types of Survey-Based Environmental Representations: Egocentric vs. Allocentric Cognitive Maps.基于调查的不同类型环境表征:自我中心认知地图与他我中心认知地图。
Brain Sci. 2023 May 22;13(5):834. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050834.
5
Does spatial cognitive style affect how navigational strategy is planned?空间认知风格是否会影响导航策略的规划?
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2523-2533. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05609-9. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Navigational Style Influences Eye Movement Pattern during Exploration and Learning of an Environmental Map.导航方式在环境地图探索与学习过程中影响眼动模式。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun 29;10:140. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00140. eCollection 2016.
7
No Gender Differences in Egocentric and Allocentric Environmental Transformation After Compensating for Male Advantage by Manipulating Familiarity.通过操纵熟悉度来补偿男性优势后,自我中心和异我中心环境转换中不存在性别差异。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 28;12:204. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00204. eCollection 2018.
8
Learning a Path from Real Navigation: The Advantage of Initial View, Cardinal North and Visuo-Spatial Ability.从真实导航中学习路径:初始视图、正北方和视觉空间能力的优势。
Brain Sci. 2020 Apr 1;10(4):204. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10040204.
9
Differences in Spatial Memory Recognition Due to Cognitive Style.认知风格导致的空间记忆识别差异。
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Aug 23;8:550. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00550. eCollection 2017.
10
Overcoming navigational challenges: A novel approach to the study and assessment of topographical orientation.克服导航挑战:一种研究和评估地形定向的新方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):752-762. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01666-7. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Cognitive Style on Individual Differences in Prismatic Adaptation: A Pilot Study.认知风格对棱镜适应个体差异的影响:一项初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 8;13(4):641. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040641.
2
"Where am I?" A snapshot of the developmental topographical disorientation among young Italian adults.“我在哪?”年轻意大利成年人发展性拓扑定位障碍的快照。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0271334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271334. eCollection 2022.
3
GPS Digital Nudge to Limit Road Crashes in Non-Expert Drivers.利用全球定位系统数字助推来减少非专业驾驶员的道路交通事故

本文引用的文献

1
Restructuring the navigational field: individual predisposition towards field independence predicts preferred navigational strategy.重构导航领域:个体对场独立性的倾向预示着偏好的导航策略。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jun;235(6):1741-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4936-1. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
2
Direct and indirect parieto-medial temporal pathways for spatial navigation in humans: evidence from resting-state functional connectivity.人类空间导航的直接和间接顶叶-内侧颞叶通路:来自静息态功能连接的证据。
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 May;222(4):1945-1957. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1318-6. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
I can see where you would be: Patterns of fMRI activity reveal imagined landmarks.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 May 27;12(6):165. doi: 10.3390/bs12060165.
4
Effect of acupuncture on gut microbiota in participants with subjective cognitive decline.针刺对主观认知下降患者肠道微生物群的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 May 6;101(18):e27743. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027743.
5
Temporal learning in the suprasecond range: insights from cognitive style.超二级范围的时间学习:认知风格的启示。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):568-582. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01667-x. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
Do Advanced Spatial Strategies Depend on the Number of Flight Hours? The Case of Military Pilots.先进空间策略是否取决于飞行小时数?以军事飞行员为例。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 25;11(7):851. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070851.
7
Wayfinding Strategy and Gender - Testing the Mediating Effects of Wayfinding Experience, Personality and Emotions.寻路策略与性别——检验寻路体验、个性和情绪的中介作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Jan 31;13:119-131. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S236735. eCollection 2020.
8
Efficacy and neural mechanism of acupuncture treatment in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: study protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial.针刺治疗主观认知下降老年人的疗效及神经机制:一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):e028317. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028317.
9
Does spatial cognitive style affect how navigational strategy is planned?空间认知风格是否会影响导航策略的规划?
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2523-2533. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05609-9. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
How does environmental knowledge allow us to come back home?环境知识如何让我们回归家园?
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jul;237(7):1811-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05552-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
我能看出你会处于何种状态:功能磁共振成像活动模式揭示了想象中的地标。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 1;144(Pt A):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.034. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
Navigational Style Influences Eye Movement Pattern during Exploration and Learning of an Environmental Map.导航方式在环境地图探索与学习过程中影响眼动模式。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun 29;10:140. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00140. eCollection 2016.
5
Neural Underpinnings of the Decline of Topographical Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment.轻度认知障碍中地形记忆衰退的神经基础
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Dec;31(8):618-630. doi: 10.1177/1533317516654757. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence.场独立性能否预测支撑人类导航的视觉空间能力?行为学证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4682-9. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Does aging affect the formation of new topographical memories? Evidence from an extensive spatial training.衰老是否会影响新的地形记忆的形成?来自广泛空间训练的证据。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2017 Jan;24(1):29-44. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1167162. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
8
Functional connectivity between posterior hippocampus and retrosplenial complex predicts individual differences in navigational ability.海马体后部与压后皮质复合体之间的功能连接可预测导航能力的个体差异。
Hippocampus. 2016 Jul;26(7):841-7. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22592. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
9
I believe I'm good at orienting myself… But is that true?我相信我很擅长确定自己的方位……但这是真的吗?
Cogn Process. 2015 Aug;16(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0655-3. Epub 2015 May 12.
10
Navigating toward a novel environment from a route or survey perspective: neural correlates and context-dependent connectivity.从路线或勘查角度导航至新环境:神经关联与情境依赖连接性
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 May;221(4):2005-21. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1021-z. Epub 2015 Mar 5.