• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.治疗前肾积水对输尿管结石患者冲击波碎石成功率的影响。
Yonsei Med J. 2017 Sep;58(5):1000-1005. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.1000.
2
Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.输尿管支架置入可预测输尿管结石患者接受体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Nov;57(6):408-416. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.基于计算机断层扫描的近端输尿管结石冲击波碎石术预后新型预测模型
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):810-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0056. Epub 2016 May 2.
4
Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.结石异质性指数作为亨氏单位的标准差:输尿管结石冲击波碎石术结果的一种新型预测指标。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 1;6:23988. doi: 10.1038/srep23988.
5
Impact of colic pain as a significant factor for predicting the stone free rate of one-session shock wave lithotripsy for treating ureter stones: a Bayesian logistic regression model analysis.绞痛疼痛作为预测输尿管结石单次冲击波碎石术结石清除率的重要因素的影响:贝叶斯逻辑回归模型分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123800. eCollection 2015.
6
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
7
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Factors predictive of shockwave lithotripsy failure for ureteral stones: why we need to hurry.输尿管结石冲击波碎石术失败的预测因素:我们为何需要抓紧时间。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Dec;71(6):644-650. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03346-0. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
9
Does the presence or degree of hydronephrosis affect the stone disintegration efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.积水的存在或程度是否会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗结石的效果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Dec;48(6):517-526. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01165-7. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:肾积水的存在及程度是否会影响治疗成功率?
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Intelligent pressure-controlled ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy versus flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones less than 3 cm in diameter: a comparative efficacy study.智能压力控制输尿管鞘联合软性输尿管镜与软性输尿管镜及经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径小于3厘米肾结石的疗效比较研究
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 3;43(1):538. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05907-8.
2
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术、逆行肾内手术及体外冲击波碎石术治疗下极肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Ann. 2025 Apr-Jun;17(2):74-83. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_60_24. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
3
Association Between Nephrolith Size and Location and Grade of Hydronephrosis.肾结石大小、位置与肾积水程度之间的关联
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 19;15(2):321. doi: 10.3390/life15020321.
4
Impact of hydronephrosis on shockwave lithotripsy outcomes for upper ureteral stones.肾积水对上段输尿管结石冲击波碎石术疗效的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04376-7.
5
Factors influencing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a retrospective study.影响超声引导体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石疗效的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Dec 20;52(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01512-9.
6
The First 100 Cases of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Korea: Matched Cohort Analyses versus Shock-Wave Lithotripsy.韩国经皮肾镜联合内镜手术的前 100 例:匹配队列分析与体外冲击波碎石术的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 May;63(5):440-445. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.5.440.
7
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮肾镜取石术、逆行性肾内手术及体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 30;57(1):26. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010026.
8
Does Early Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improve the Cost-Effectiveness of Renal Stone Management?早期逆行性肾盂内手术是否提高肾结石管理的成本效益?
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Jun;61(6):515-523. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.6.515.
9
Traditional Chinese medicine on treating ureteral calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.中医治疗输尿管结石:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(37):e17057. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017057.
10
Predictors of Uric Acid Stones: Mean Stone Density, Stone Heterogeneity Index, and Variation Coefficient of Stone Density by Single-Energy Non-Contrast Computed Tomography and Urinary pH.尿酸结石的预测因素:单能量非增强计算机断层扫描及尿液pH值所测的平均结石密度、结石异质性指数和结石密度变异系数
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 13;8(2):243. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020243.

本文引用的文献

1
Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.结石异质性指数作为亨氏单位的标准差:输尿管结石冲击波碎石术结果的一种新型预测指标。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 1;6:23988. doi: 10.1038/srep23988.
2
Optimal Skin-to-Stone Distance Is a Positive Predictor for Successful Outcomes in Upper Ureter Calculi following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach.最佳皮肤至结石距离是体外冲击波碎石术后上尿路结石成功治疗结果的阳性预测指标:一种贝叶斯模型平均法
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0144912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144912. eCollection 2015.
3
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
Impact of colic pain as a significant factor for predicting the stone free rate of one-session shock wave lithotripsy for treating ureter stones: a Bayesian logistic regression model analysis.绞痛疼痛作为预测输尿管结石单次冲击波碎石术结石清除率的重要因素的影响:贝叶斯逻辑回归模型分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123800. eCollection 2015.
5
Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?腹部平片上的结石密度能否预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果?
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jan;56(1):56-62. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.56. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
6
Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效预测
Urol Res. 2011 Feb;39(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0274-5. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
7
Impact of the degree of hydronephrosis on the efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi.肾积水程度对原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石疗效的影响
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(3):208-13. doi: 10.1080/00365590601068892.
8
Prediction of stone-free rate after ESWL.体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的预测
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):318-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.059. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
9
Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention.25年后的体外冲击波碎石术:并发症及其预防
Eur Urol. 2006 Nov;50(5):981-90; discussion 990. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.045. Epub 2006 Feb 7.

治疗前肾积水对输尿管结石患者冲击波碎石成功率的影响。

Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.

作者信息

Chang Ki Don, Lee Joo Yong, Park Sung Yoon, Kang Dong Hyuk, Lee Hyung Ho, Cho Kang Su

机构信息

Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2017 Sep;58(5):1000-1005. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.1000.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.1000
PMID:28792145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5552626/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate predictors of the success rate for one session of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), focusing on the relationships between pretreatment hydronephrosis grade and one-session SWL success rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 1824 consecutive patients who underwent an initial session of SWL for treatment of urinary stones between 2005 and 2013 were reviewed. After exclusion, 700 patients with a single, 4-20 mm diameter radiopaque calculus were included in the study.

RESULTS

The mean maximal stone length (MSL) and skin-to-stone distance were 9.2±3.9 and 110.8±18.9 mm, respectively. The average values for mean stone density (MSD) and stone heterogeneity index (SHI) were 707.0±272.1 and 244.9±110.1, respectively. One-session success rates were 68.4, 75.0, 75.1, 54.0, and 10.5% in patients with hydronephrosis grade 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Patients were classified into success or failure groups based on SWL outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that MSL [odds ratio (OR) 0.888, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.841-0.934, p<0.001], MSD (OR 0.996, 95% CI: 0.995-0.997, p<0.001), SHI (OR 1.007, 95% CI: 1.005-1.010, p<0.001), and pretreatment hydronephrosis grade (OR 0.601, 95% CI: 0.368-0.988, p=0.043) were significantly associated with one-session success.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment grades 3 or 4 hydronephrosis were associated with failure of SWL in patients with a single ureteral stone. In the presence of severe hydronephrosis, especially hydronephrosis grade 4; physicians should proceed cautiously in choosing and offering SWL as the primary treatment for ureteral stone.

摘要

目的

评估单次冲击波碎石术(SWL)成功率的预测因素,重点关注治疗前肾积水分级与单次SWL成功率之间的关系。

材料与方法

回顾了2005年至2013年间1824例连续接受初次SWL治疗尿路结石患者的病历。排除后,700例患有单个直径4 - 20毫米不透X线结石的患者纳入研究。

结果

平均最大结石长度(MSL)和皮肤至结石距离分别为9.2±3.9毫米和110.8±18.9毫米。平均结石密度(MSD)和结石异质性指数(SHI)的平均值分别为707.0±272.1和244.9±110.1。肾积水0级、1级、2级、3级和4级患者的单次成功率分别为68.4%、75.0%、75.1%、54.0%和10.5%。根据SWL结果将患者分为成功或失败组。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,MSL [比值比(OR)0.888,95%置信区间(CI):0.841 - 0.934,p<0.001]、MSD(OR 0.996,95% CI:0.995 - 0.997,p<0.001)、SHI(OR 1.007,95% CI:1.005 - 1.010,p<0.001)和治疗前肾积水分级(OR 0.601,95% CI:0.368 - 0.988,p = 0.043)与单次成功显著相关。

结论

治疗前3级或4级肾积水与单个输尿管结石患者SWL失败相关。在存在严重肾积水,尤其是4级肾积水的情况下,医生在选择并将SWL作为输尿管结石的主要治疗方法时应谨慎行事。