• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾积水程度对原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石疗效的影响

Impact of the degree of hydronephrosis on the efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi.

作者信息

El-Assmy Ahmed, El-Nahas Ahmed R, Youssef Ramy F, El-Hefnawy Ahmed S, Sheir Khaled Z

机构信息

Urology & Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(3):208-13. doi: 10.1080/00365590601068892.

DOI:10.1080/00365590601068892
PMID:17469029
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a prospective randomized study to investigate the relation between the degree of stone-induced hydronephrosis and the outcome of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with lumbar ureter stones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 284 patients with solitary lumbar ureter stones with or without hydronephrosis were treated with ESWL. The degree of hydronephrosis was determined by means of renal ultrasound. Patients were divided into four groups according to the degree of stone-induced hydronephrosis. The results were analyzed by comparing stone-free rates, the number of shock waves, the number of sessions, the incidence of complications, secondary interventions and time to stone clearance.

RESULTS

The mean stone size was 11.4+/-2.6 mm. In the hydronephrotic group, the stone-free rate was 80.3%, compared to 89.1% in patients without hydronephrosis (p=0.12). The mean time to stone clearance was 13.8+/-9.8 days. Differences among the four groups in terms of stone size and treatment outcome were not significant. However, the presence of hydronephrosis was highly associated with repeat treatment (2.4 vs 1.7 treatments; p<0.001) and prolonged clearance time (16.2 vs 11.6 days; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In cases with solitary lumbar ureter stones, the degree of hydronephrosis caused by the stone does not affect the overall treatment success with ESWL. However, stones in obstructed systems are associated with a tendency for repeat treatment and a prolonged time for stone clearance.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以探讨输尿管上段结石患者结石所致肾积水程度与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗效果之间的关系。

材料与方法

共有284例单发输尿管上段结石患者接受了ESWL治疗,无论有无肾积水。通过肾脏超声确定肾积水程度。根据结石所致肾积水程度将患者分为四组。通过比较结石清除率、冲击波次数、治疗次数、并发症发生率、二次干预措施及结石清除时间来分析结果。

结果

结石平均大小为11.4±2.6mm。肾积水组的结石清除率为80.3%,无肾积水患者的结石清除率为89.1%(p=0.12)。结石清除的平均时间为13.8±9.8天。四组之间在结石大小和治疗效果方面的差异不显著。然而,肾积水的存在与重复治疗(2.4次与1.7次治疗;p<0.001)及结石清除时间延长(16.2天与11.6天;p<0.001)高度相关。

结论

对于单发输尿管上段结石病例,结石所致肾积水程度不影响ESWL的总体治疗成功率。然而,梗阻系统中的结石与重复治疗倾向及结石清除时间延长有关。

相似文献

1
Impact of the degree of hydronephrosis on the efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi.肾积水程度对原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石疗效的影响
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(3):208-13. doi: 10.1080/00365590601068892.
2
Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?肾积水程度会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的成功率吗?
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.010.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:肾积水的存在及程度是否会影响治疗成功率?
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
4
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients.急性与非急性患者近端输尿管结石的快速体外冲击波碎石术
Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
5
Impact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.肾积水对体外冲击波碎石术后孤立性近端输尿管结石治疗效果的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Oct;24(10):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70009-9.
6
Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for proximal and distal ureteric stones.近端与远端输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的比较研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9214-x. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
7
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance.首次肾绞痛发作后立即进行体外冲击波碎石术治疗与输尿管结石清除加速相关。
Eur Urol. 2006 Jun;49(6):1099-105; discussion 1105-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructed proximal ureteral stones. A prospective randomized study comparing in situ, stent bypass and below stone catheter with irrigation strategies.体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管梗阻性结石。一项比较原位、支架旁路及结石下方置管并冲洗策略的前瞻性随机研究。
Eur Urol. 1993;24(2):177-84.
9
Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.优化体外冲击波碎石术输送率可实现输尿管结石的优异疗效:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果。
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.110. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
10
Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的预后因素——一项多变量分析研究
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(5):413-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590310006255.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of hydronephrosis on shockwave lithotripsy outcomes for upper ureteral stones.肾积水对上段输尿管结石冲击波碎石术疗效的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04376-7.
2
Development and validation of a predictive model for treatment outcome after emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with symptomatic ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic: in a large prospective cohort.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对有症状的输尿管结石患者行急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗结局的预测模型的开发和验证:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 31;51(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01401-7.
3
The effect of stone size on the results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of upper ureteric stones.
结石大小对体外冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜碎石术治疗上输尿管结石效果的影响
Arab J Urol. 2021 Nov 26;20(1):30-35. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1996820. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.治疗前肾积水对输尿管结石患者冲击波碎石成功率的影响。
Yonsei Med J. 2017 Sep;58(5):1000-1005. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.1000.
5
Management of upper ureteral stones exceeding 15 mm in diameter: Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.直径超过15毫米的上段输尿管结石的治疗:冲击波碎石术与钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术联合半硬性输尿管镜检查的比较
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Dec 20;4:2050312116685180. doi: 10.1177/2050312116685180. eCollection 2016.
6
Recent finding and new technologies in nephrolitiasis: a review of the recent literature.肾结石研究的新发现和新技术:对近期文献的综述。
BMC Urol. 2013 Feb 16;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-10.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as a first-line therapy for ureteral calculi with impaired renal function due to hydronephrosis.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1674. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0387-5. Epub 2009 Apr 3.