Suppr超能文献

不同类型市售氧化锆和锂硅材料透光率的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of transmittance for different types of commercially available zirconia and lithium disilicate materials.

机构信息

M.A.Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Centre for Materials for Electronics Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Dec;6(6):456-61. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.456. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Translucency and colour stability are two most important aspects for an aesthetic dental restoration. Glass ceramic restorations are popular amongst clinicians because of their superior aesthetic properties. In the last decade, zirconia has generated tremendous interest due to its favorable mechanical and biological properties. However, zirconia lacks the translucency that lithium disilicate materials possess and therefore has limitations in its use, especially in esthetically demanding situations. There has been a great thrust in research towards developing translucent zirconia materials for dental restorations. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the transmittance of a translucent variant of zirconia to lithium disilicate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two commercially available zirconia materials (conventional and high translucency) and 2 lithium disilicate materials (conventional and high translucency) with standardized dimensions were fabricated. Transmittance values were measured for all samples followed by a microstructural analysis using a finite element scanning electron microscope. One way analysis of variance combined with a Tukey-post hoc test was used to analyze the data obtained (P=.05).

RESULTS

High translucency lithium disilicate showed highest transmittance of all materials studied, followed by conventional lithium disilicate, high translucency zirconia and conventional zirconia. The difference between all groups of materials was statistically significant. The transmittance of the different materials correlated to their microstructure analysis.

CONCLUSION

Despite manufacturers' efforts to make zirconia significantly more translucent, the transmittance values of these materials still do not match conventional lithium disilicate. More research is required on zirconia towards making the material more translucent for its potential use as esthetic monolithic restoration.

摘要

目的

半透明性和颜色稳定性是美学牙科修复体最重要的两个方面。由于其卓越的美学性能,玻璃陶瓷修复体在临床医生中很受欢迎。在过去的十年中,由于其优异的机械和生物学性能,氧化锆引起了极大的兴趣。然而,氧化锆缺乏锂硅玻璃陶瓷材料所具有的半透明性,因此在使用方面存在局限性,尤其是在美学要求高的情况下。在研究开发用于牙科修复体的半透明氧化锆材料方面已经取得了很大的进展。本研究的目的是评估和比较半透明氧化锆变体与锂硅玻璃陶瓷的透光率。

材料和方法

制作了两种市售氧化锆材料(常规和高透光率)和两种具有标准化尺寸的锂硅玻璃陶瓷材料(常规和高透光率)。对所有样品进行透光率值测量,然后使用有限元扫描电子显微镜进行微观结构分析。采用单向方差分析结合 Tukey 事后检验对获得的数据进行分析(P=.05)。

结果

高透光率锂硅玻璃陶瓷显示出所有研究材料中最高的透光率,其次是常规锂硅玻璃陶瓷、高透光率氧化锆和常规氧化锆。所有材料组之间的差异具有统计学意义。不同材料的透光率与其微观结构分析相关。

结论

尽管制造商努力使氧化锆的半透明性显著提高,但这些材料的透光率值仍然无法与常规锂硅玻璃陶瓷相匹配。需要对氧化锆进行更多的研究,以提高材料的半透明性,使其有可能作为美学整体修复体使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/4279043/63ff2249424d/jap-6-456-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验