• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

避孕使用障碍感知量表:一项方法学研究。

Perceptıon scale of barrıers to contraceptıve use: a methodologıcal study.

作者信息

Sen Selma, Cetinkaya Aynur, Cavuslar Aysel

机构信息

Midwifery Department, Faculty of Sciences, Celal Bayar University, 45100 Sehzadeler, Manisa, Turkey.

Nursing Department, Faculty of Sciences, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.

出版信息

Fertil Res Pract. 2017 Aug 3;3:11. doi: 10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9
PMID:28794891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5543743/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to design and develop the Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use (PSBCU) as a measurement tool for the qualitative assessment of the barriers and obstacles women perceived with regard to contraceptive use or low rates of contraceptive use in women using family planning services.

METHOD

The data for this methodological study were collected using the face-to-face interview technique from 320 married women between the ages of 15-49 who were attending clinics at the Hafsa Sultan Hospital, CBU. The data collection tools used in the study, which was carried out from May to September 2014, were the "Introductory Information Form" and the "Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use". Language validity and construct validity (explanatory factor analysis) were applied in order to test the validity of the Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use.

RESULTS

Kaiser Meier Olkin (KMO) analysis was performed to determine the availability of the scale for the size of participants. The sample adequacy calculated as the KMO value was 0.916 and the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (X = 6721.793  < 0.000) sample size analysis value was found to be sufficient for factor analysis. The total Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 34 items which included three factors explaining 54.95% of the variance after Varimax rotation was calculated to be 0.95. The largest factor was the "cognitive domain" explaining 18.89% of the variance, followed by the "emotional domain" explaining 18.05% of the variance, and finally the "social domain" explaining 18.01% of the variance. Item-total score correlation coefficients of scale items were found to be between 0.54 and 0.83.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrateded that the "Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use" was valid and reliable. We believe that the scale is suitable for use by women in a family planning education and training programs in order to evaluate their situation. It should also be assessed for validity and reliability for different groups (adolescents, men, etc.).

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是设计并开发避孕使用障碍感知量表(PSBCU),作为一种测量工具,用于定性评估女性在使用计划生育服务时对避孕使用或低避孕使用率所感知到的障碍和阻碍。

方法

本方法学研究的数据通过面对面访谈技术,从320名年龄在15 - 49岁之间、在恰纳卡莱布伦大学哈夫萨·苏丹医院诊所就诊的已婚女性中收集。2014年5月至9月进行的该研究中使用的数据收集工具为“基本信息表”和“避孕使用障碍感知量表”。为检验避孕使用障碍感知量表的有效性,应用了语言效度和结构效度(解释性因素分析)。

结果

进行了凯泽 - 迈耶 - 奥尔金(KMO)分析,以确定该量表对于参与者规模的适用性。计算得出的作为KMO值的样本充足性为0.916,巴特利特球形检验(X = 6721.793 < 0.000)样本量分析值被发现足以进行因素分析。在方差最大化旋转后,包括解释54.95%方差的三个因素的34个条目的总克朗巴哈系数计算为0.95。最大的因素是“认知领域”,解释了18.89%的方差,其次是“情感领域”,解释了18.05%的方差,最后是“社会领域”,解释了18.01%的方差。量表条目的项目 - 总分相关系数在0.54至0.83之间。

结论

该研究表明“避孕使用障碍感知量表”是有效且可靠的。我们认为该量表适用于计划生育教育和培训项目中的女性,以评估她们的情况。对于不同群体(青少年、男性等),也应评估其效度和信度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5438/5543743/ed5218664901/40738_2017_38_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5438/5543743/ed5218664901/40738_2017_38_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5438/5543743/ed5218664901/40738_2017_38_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptıon scale of barrıers to contraceptıve use: a methodologıcal study.避孕使用障碍感知量表:一项方法学研究。
Fertil Res Pract. 2017 Aug 3;3:11. doi: 10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9. eCollection 2017.
2
Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the scales of perceived stigma for children with epilepsy and their parents.癫痫患儿及其父母感知耻辱量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Jul 11;5(3):238-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.07.004. eCollection 2018 Jul 10.
3
Disabled woman attitude scale: Reliability and validity study.残疾女性态度量表:信效度研究。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Oct 28;8(5):454-463. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.57701. eCollection 2021.
4
Empathy Assessment Scale.同理心评估量表。
North Clin Istanb. 2022 Aug 16;9(4):358-366. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.55649. eCollection 2022.
5
The validity and reliability of the type 2 diabetes and health promotion scale Turkish version: a methodological study.2型糖尿病与健康促进量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度:一项方法学研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Mar;32(1):417-421. doi: 10.1111/scs.12483. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
6
Oral impact on daily performance (OIDP) scale for use in Sri Lankan adolescents: a cross sectional modification and validation study.用于斯里兰卡青少年的口腔影响日常生活量表(OIDP)的跨横断面修正和验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1006-z.
7
Structural validity and reliability of the return to work assessment scale among post stroke survivors.脑卒中幸存者工作恢复评估量表的结构效度和信度。
Work. 2021;69(3):969-979. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213528.
8
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.土耳其语版产前母乳喂养自我效能量表的信效度
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.
9
Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale.慢性病治疗的功能评估:土耳其文版精神幸福感量表的效度和信度。
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Dec;15(6):684-692. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000013. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Development of an oral anticoagulant-use attitude scale, and assessment of its validity and reliability.口服抗凝剂使用态度量表的编制及其效度和信度评估。
Saudi Med J. 2018 Dec;39(12):1242-1248. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.12.23138.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Perspectives on Contraceptive use in North India: A Case for Increased Contraceptive Counseling by Providers.印度北部患者对避孕措施的看法:医疗服务提供者应加强避孕咨询的理由。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Dec;73(6):512-521. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01781-9. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices.探讨通过控制生育改善妇女健康状况的准备情况:影响计划生育实践中现代避孕方法采用的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11892. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211892.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with contraceptive use in Tigray, North Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷地区与避孕措施使用相关的因素。
Reprod Health. 2017 Feb 23;14(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0281-x.
2
Similarities and differences in contraceptive use reported by women and men in the National Survey of Family Growth.全国家庭成长调查中男性和女性报告的避孕措施使用情况的异同。
Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
3
Contraceptive knowledge, sexual behavior, and factors associated with contraceptive use among female undergraduate university students in Kilimanjaro region in Tanzania.
Validation of family planning tool in the pastoralist community.
验证计划生育工具在牧民社区中的适用性。
Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 14;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00976-x.
坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗地区女大学生的避孕知识、性行为及与避孕措施使用相关的因素。
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2016 Oct 3;7:109-115. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S108531. eCollection 2016.
4
"Doctors are in the best position to know…": The perceived medicalization of contraceptive method choice in Ibadan and Kaduna, Nigeria.“医生最有资格了解……”:尼日利亚伊巴丹和卡杜纳地区避孕方法选择的医学化认知
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Aug;99(8):1400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
5
International gender bias in nursing research, 2005-2006: a quantitative content analysis.2005 - 2006年护理研究中的国际性别偏见:一项定量内容分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Aug;46(8):1102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
6
The influence of nurse home visits, including provision of 3 months of contraceptives and contraceptive counseling, on perceived barriers to contraceptive use and contraceptive use self-efficacy.护士家访(包括提供3个月的避孕药具和避孕咨询)对避孕使用感知障碍和避孕使用自我效能的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2008 Nov-Dec;18(6):471-81. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
7
Finding the best fit: a grounded theory of contraceptive decision making in women.寻找最佳契合点:关于女性避孕决策的扎根理论
Nurs Forum. 2004 Oct-Dec;39(4):13-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2004.tb00010.x.
8
Factors affecting contraceptive use in women seeking pregnancy tests: Missouri, 1997.影响寻求妊娠试验的女性避孕措施使用情况的因素:密苏里州,1997年
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 May-Jun;32(3):124-31.