Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3113-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4183-0. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
In this meta-analysis, evidence of an association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and low-energy fractures has been evaluated including 12 observational studies. The results suggested that T2DM patients had an enhanced risk of low-energy fractures.
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients have been shown to be at enhanced risk of fracture injury, but less is known about low-energy fractures among patients with T2DM.
We performed a meta-analysis of 12 observational studies identified in Medline and EMBASE that included 938,742 participants, including 30,827 low-energy fracture cases. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of low-energy fractures were determined using a random-effects model.
The IRRs of low-energy fracture for men and women were 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-2.00; p = 0.096) and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.35; p = 0.000), respectively, and the overall IRR was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.12-1.35; p = 0.000). The IRRs for hip and vertebral fractures were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02-1.15; p = 0.007) and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.98-1.48; p = 0.073), respectively. The IRRs of low-energy fracture in case-control, prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.81-1.72; p = 0.380), 1.17 (95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = 0.006), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02-1.29; p = 0.020), and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.21-2.12; p = 0.001), respectively. The IRRs of low-energy fracture for less than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, and more than 10 years were 1.30 (95%, CI 1.13-1.50; p = 0.000), 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.08; p = 0.000), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.00-1.41; p = 0.049), respectively.
Patients with T2DM had a greater risk of low-energy fracture especially of the hip, compared with that in non-diabetic subjects. However, since according to our funnel plot a publication bias may be present and due to study heterogeneity as well as the limited number of publications, the finding needs to be interpreted with caution.
本荟萃分析评估了 12 项观察性研究中 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)与低能量骨折之间的关联证据。结果表明,T2DM 患者发生低能量骨折的风险增加。
已有研究表明 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)患者骨折风险增加,但 T2DM 患者发生低能量骨折的情况知之甚少。
我们对 Medline 和 EMBASE 中确定的 12 项观察性研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究纳入了 938742 名参与者,包括 30827 例低能量骨折病例。使用随机效应模型确定低能量骨折的发病率比值比(IRR)。
男性和女性的低能量骨折 IRR 分别为 1.37(95%置信区间 [CI],0.94-2.00;p=0.096)和 1.22(95%CI,1.09-1.35;p=0.000),总体 IRR 为 1.23(95%CI,1.12-1.35;p=0.000)。髋部和椎体骨折的 IRR 分别为 1.08(95%CI,1.02-1.15;p=0.007)和 1.21(95%CI,0.98-1.48;p=0.073)。病例对照、前瞻性、回顾性和横断面研究的低能量骨折 IRR 分别为 1.18(95%CI,0.81-1.72;p=0.380)、1.17(95%CI,1.05-1.32,p=0.006)、1.15(95%CI,1.02-1.29;p=0.020)和 1.60(95%CI,1.21-2.12;p=0.001)。低能量骨折发生时间<5 年、5-10 年和>10 年的 IRR 分别为 1.30(95%CI,1.13-1.50;p=0.000)、1.05(95%CI,1.03-1.08;p=0.000)和 1.19(95%CI,1.00-1.41;p=0.049)。
与非糖尿病患者相比,T2DM 患者发生低能量骨折的风险更高,尤其是髋部骨折。然而,由于我们的漏斗图显示可能存在发表偏倚,并且由于研究异质性以及发表文献数量有限,因此需要谨慎解释这一发现。