Halstead F D, Webber M A, Oppenheim B A
Clinical Scientist, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Research Leader, NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK.
J Wound Care. 2017 Aug 2;26(8):442-450. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.8.442.
We previously reported on the ability of SurgihoneyRO (SHRO), an engineered honey, to prevent biofilm formation in vitro, but data were lacking regarding the activity against preformed biofilms. This study aims to assess whether SHRO has any antibacterial activity against mature, preformed biofilms and whether there is any evidence to support the observed clinical effectiveness when SHRO has been used anecdotally on acute and chronic wounds where biofilm is most likely present.
We tested the in vitro antibacterial activity of SHRO against the mature biofilms of 16 clinically relevant wound pathogens, in terms of impacts on biofilm seeding and biofilm biomass. The honey was serially double diluted from 1:3 down to 1:6144, and the lowest dilution achieving a statistically significant reduction in biomass of ≥50%, compared with untreated controls, was recorded.
All 16 bacterial isolates were susceptible to SHRO, with reduced biofilm seeding observed for all, and percentage reductions ranging from 58% (ACI_C59) to 94.3% (MDR_B) for the strongest concentration of honey (1:3). Furthermore at this concentration, biofilm seeding of the test biofilm was reduced by 80-94.3% (when compared with the positive control) for 12/16 isolates. We additionally demonstrated that SHRO has antibiofilm impacts, with the 24 hour exposure resulting in disruption of the biofilm, reduced seeding and reduced biomass.
SHRO is effective at reducing seeding of preformed biofilms of clinically important wound pathogens in vitro, and also has antibiofilm activity. This supports the anecdotal clinical data for antibiofilm efficacy, and supports the use of SHRO as a promising topical wound care agent.
我们之前报道了一种经过改造的蜂蜜SurgihoneyRO(SHRO)在体外预防生物膜形成的能力,但缺乏关于其对已形成生物膜活性的数据。本研究旨在评估SHRO对成熟的、已形成的生物膜是否具有抗菌活性,以及是否有证据支持在急性和慢性伤口(最有可能存在生物膜)上轶事性使用SHRO时所观察到的临床有效性。
我们测试了SHRO对16种临床相关伤口病原体成熟生物膜的体外抗菌活性,包括对生物膜接种和生物膜生物量的影响。将蜂蜜从1:3连续两倍稀释至1:6144,并记录与未处理对照相比,生物量减少≥50%具有统计学意义的最低稀释度。
所有16种细菌分离株均对SHRO敏感,所有分离株的生物膜接种均减少,蜂蜜最强浓度(1:3)下的减少百分比范围为58%(ACI_C59)至94.3%(MDR_B)。此外,在此浓度下,12/16分离株的测试生物膜接种减少了80 - 94.3%(与阳性对照相比)。我们还证明了SHRO具有抗生物膜作用,24小时暴露导致生物膜破坏、接种减少和生物量减少。
SHRO在体外可有效减少临床上重要伤口病原体已形成生物膜的接种,并且具有抗生物膜活性。这支持了抗生物膜功效的轶事性临床数据,并支持将SHRO用作一种有前景的局部伤口护理剂。