• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种在学习型健康系统背景下加速基于基因组技术的证据生成的方法。

A proposed approach to accelerate evidence generation for genomic-based technologies in the context of a learning health system.

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Genomic Medicine Institute Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2018 Apr;20(4):390-396. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.122. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2017.122
PMID:28796238
Abstract

Genomic technologies should demonstrate analytical and clinical validity and clinical utility prior to wider adoption in clinical practice. However, the question of clinical utility remains unanswered for many genomic technologies. In this paper, we propose three building blocks for rapid generation of evidence on clinical utility of promising genomic technologies that underpin clinical and policy decisions. We define promising genomic tests as those that have proven analytical and clinical validity. First, risk-sharing agreements could be implemented between payers and manufacturers to enable temporary coverage that would help incorporate promising technologies into routine clinical care. Second, existing data networks, such as the Sentinel Initiative and the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) could be leveraged, augmented with genomic information to track the use of genomic technologies and monitor clinical outcomes in millions of people. Third, endorsement and engagement from key stakeholders will be needed to establish this collaborative model for rapid evidence generation; all stakeholders will benefit from better information regarding the clinical utility of these technologies. This collaborative model can create a multipurpose and reusable national resource that generates knowledge from data gathered as part of routine care to drive evidence-based clinical practice and health system changes.

摘要

基因组技术在更广泛地应用于临床实践之前,应该证明其分析和临床有效性和临床实用性。然而,许多基因组技术的临床实用性问题仍未得到解答。在本文中,我们提出了三个构建模块,用于快速生成有前途的基因组技术临床实用性的证据,这些技术为临床和决策提供支持。我们将有前途的基因检测定义为那些已经证明具有分析和临床有效性的检测。首先,可以在支付方和制造商之间实施风险分担协议,以实现临时覆盖,从而帮助将有前途的技术纳入常规临床护理。其次,可以利用现有的数据网络,如 Sentinel 倡议和国家以患者为中心的临床研究网络(PCORnet),并利用基因组信息对其进行扩充,以跟踪基因组技术的使用情况,并监测数百万人的临床结果。第三,需要关键利益相关者的认可和参与,以建立这种快速生成证据的合作模式;所有利益相关者都将从这些技术的临床实用性的相关信息中受益。这种合作模式可以创建一个多用途和可重复使用的国家资源,从常规护理中收集的数据中生成知识,以推动循证临床实践和卫生系统的变革。

相似文献

1
A proposed approach to accelerate evidence generation for genomic-based technologies in the context of a learning health system.一种在学习型健康系统背景下加速基于基因组技术的证据生成的方法。
Genet Med. 2018 Apr;20(4):390-396. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.122. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Stakeholder assessment of the evidence for cancer genomic tests: insights from three case studies.利益相关者对癌症基因组检测证据的评估:来自三个案例研究的启示。
Genet Med. 2012 Jul;14(7):656-62. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.3.
4
Translating genomics in cancer care.癌症诊疗中的基因组学翻译。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Nov;11(11):1343-53. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0158.
5
The genomic applications in practice and prevention network.基因组学在实践与预防方面的应用网络。
Genet Med. 2009 Jul;11(7):488-94. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a551cc.
6
Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.澳大利亚基因组学:5 年国家计划加速基因组学在医疗保健中的整合的结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Mar 2;110(3):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.01.018.
7
Controversy and debate on clinical genomics sequencing-paper 1: genomics is not exceptional: rigorous evaluations are necessary for clinical applications of genomic sequencing.关于临床基因组测序的争议与辩论——论文1:基因组学并非特例:基因组测序临床应用需要严格评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.用于评估基因组损伤的下一代检测策略:一个概念框架及考量因素
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Jun;58(5):264-283. doi: 10.1002/em.22045. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
9
Improved Diagnosis and Care for Rare Diseases through Implementation of Precision Public Health Framework.通过实施精准公共卫生框架,改善罕见病的诊断和护理。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:55-94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_4.
10
Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.在管理决策中理解证据:基于研究的知识在医疗保健中的创新采用和实施的作用。研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Considering Clinical Implementation of Polygenic Scores in Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment: Recipients' Perspectives on Influencing Factors and Strategies.遗传性癌症风险评估中多基因评分的临床应用考量:接受者对影响因素及策略的看法
Patient. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00747-5.
2
An Assessment of Real-World Evidence and Other Sources Supporting Payer Coverage Decisions for Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry.对支持精神病学中药物基因组检测支付方覆盖决策的真实世界证据及其他来源的评估。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):232. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060232.
3
The power of personas: Exploring an innovative model for understanding stakeholder perspectives in an oncology learning health network.

本文引用的文献

1
Making genomic medicine evidence-based and patient-centered: a structured review and landscape analysis of comparative effectiveness research.使基因组医学具有循证性和以患者为中心:比较有效性研究的结构化综述和全景分析。
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1081-1091. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.21. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
2
Convergence of Implementation Science, Precision Medicine, and the Learning Health Care System: A New Model for Biomedical Research.实施科学、精准医学与学习型医疗保健系统的融合:生物医学研究的新模式。
JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1941-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3867.
3
The Geisinger MyCode community health initiative: an electronic health record-linked biobank for precision medicine research.
患者角色的力量:探索一种创新模型,以理解肿瘤学学习健康网络中利益相关者的观点。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 May 27;9(1):e10422. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10422. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Effect of clinical decision support for severe hypercholesterolemia on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.严重高胆固醇血症临床决策支持对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 18;7(1):73. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01069-w.
5
Identifying requisite learning health system competencies: a scoping review.确定必要的学习健康系统能力:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 23;12(8):e061124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061124.
6
Towards a Responsible Transition to Learning Healthcare Systems in Precision Medicine: Ethical Points to Consider.迈向精准医学中学习型医疗系统的负责任转型:需考虑的伦理要点
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 10;11(6):539. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060539.
7
Governing Personalized Health: A Scoping Review.管理个性化健康:一项范围综述
Front Genet. 2021 Apr 21;12:650504. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.650504. eCollection 2021.
8
Opportunities and challenges for the computational interpretation of rare variation in clinically important genes.临床上重要基因中罕见变异的计算解读的机遇与挑战。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr 1;108(4):535-548. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.003.
9
Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement.乳腺癌个体化早期检测和预防:ENVISION 共识声明。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;17(11):687-705. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
Generating evidence for precision medicine: considerations made by the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium when designing and operationalizing the PREPARE study.为精准医学生成证据:当设计和实施 PREPARE 研究时,无处不在的药物基因组学联盟所考虑的因素。
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2020 Aug;30(6):131-144. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000405.
盖辛格MyCode社区健康倡议:一个用于精准医学研究的与电子健康记录相链接的生物样本库。
Genet Med. 2016 Sep;18(9):906-13. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.187. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
The IGNITE network: a model for genomic medicine implementation and research.IGNITE网络:基因组医学实施与研究的一个模型。
BMC Med Genomics. 2016 Jan 5;9:1. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0162-5.
5
The 21st Century Cures Act--Will It Take Us Back in Time?《21世纪治愈法案》——它会让我们倒退吗?
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2473-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1506964. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource.ClinGen——临床基因组资源。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1406261. Epub 2015 May 27.
7
Can genomic medicine improve financial sustainability of health systems?基因组医学能否提高卫生系统的财务可持续性?
Mol Diagn Ther. 2015 Apr;19(2):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s40291-015-0138-3.
8
Patient access schemes in Asia-pacific markets: current experience and future potential.亚太市场的患者准入计划:当前经验与未来潜力
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015 Feb 16;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40545-014-0019-x. eCollection 2015.
9
GINA, genetic discrimination, and genomic medicine.《全球哮喘防治创议》、基因歧视与基因组医学。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):397-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1404776.
10
Tumoral TP53 and/or CDKN2A alterations are not reliable prognostic biomarkers in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.肿瘤性TP53和/或CDKN2A改变在局限性尤因肉瘤患者中并非可靠的预后生物标志物:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 May;62(5):759-65. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25340. Epub 2014 Dec 2.