• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁应该照顾我?老年人对专业长期护理人员特征的偏好:一项观察性横断面研究。

Who should take care of me? Preferences of old age individuals for characteristics of professional long-term caregivers: an observational cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Hajek André, Lehnert Thomas, Wegener Annemarie, Riedel-Heller Steffi G, König Hans-Helmut

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 10;10(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2717-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-017-2717-3
PMID:28797282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5553919/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is most likely that the need for long-term care increases considerably in the next decades due to demographic shifts. Thus, we aimed at identifying the preferences for characteristics of professional long-term caregivers among old age individuals in Germany.

METHODS

Data were gathered from a population-based survey of the German population aged 65 and above in 2015 (n = 1006).

RESULTS

It was important for individuals in old age that long-term caregivers were 'empathetic, kind' (99.3%), 'punctual, reliable' (98.2%), have an 'orderly appearance' (96.4%), work in a 'small team' (92.5%) and have 'enough time' (91.5%). Moreover, while most of the individuals (76.5%) reported high preferences for 'German language', the preferences were lower for 'same cultural background' (54.2%) and 'same gender' (35.7%). In multiple logistic regressions, preferences for 'same gender' were positively associated with being female [OR 8.3 (5.6-12.1)], living with partner or spouse [OR 1.4 (1.0-1.9)], and being born abroad [OR 1.8 (1.1-3.1)]. Preferences for 'German language' were positively associated with being female [OR: 1.5 (1.1-2.1)]. Preferences for 'same cultural background' were positively associated with age [OR 1.0 (1.0-1.1)], living with partner or spouse [OR 1.4 (1.0-1.9)], and East Germany [OR 1.9 (1.3-2.7)]. Preferences for 'orderly appearance', 'empathetic, kind', 'punctual, reliable' and 'small nursing team' were all not significantly associated with included independent variables, whereas preferences for 'enough time' were positively associated with being female [OR 1.9 (1.1-3.5)], living with partner or spouse [OR 1.9 (1.1-3.4)], education [Apprenticeship, full-time vocational school, OR 3.1 (1.3-7.6)], not providing care for family/friends [OR 1.9 (1.1-3.3)], and involvement in the issue of need for care [OR 1.3 (1.1-1.6)].

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that it is important to almost every individual aged 65 and above in Germany that professional long-term caregivers are (i) empathetic, kind, and understanding, (ii) punctual and reliable, (iii) have enough time (e.g., for conversation), (iv) and have an orderly appearance. Furthermore, several factors such as gender or region were found to be associated with preferences for characteristics of caregivers. By knowing these factors, nursing services can tailor their activities to the needs of care-recipients.

摘要

背景

由于人口结构变化,未来几十年对长期护理的需求很可能会大幅增加。因此,我们旨在确定德国老年人对专业长期护理人员特征的偏好。

方法

数据来自2015年对德国65岁及以上人群进行的一项基于人口的调查(n = 1006)。

结果

对于老年人来说,长期护理人员“有同理心、和蔼可亲”(99.3%)、“准时、可靠”(98.2%)、“外表整洁”(96.4%)、在“小团队”工作(92.5%)以及“有足够时间”(91.5%)很重要。此外,虽然大多数人(76.5%)对“德语”有较高偏好,但对“相同文化背景”(54.2%)和“相同性别”(35.7%)的偏好较低。在多项逻辑回归中,对“相同性别”的偏好与女性[比值比8.3(5.6 - 12.1)]、与伴侣或配偶同住[比值比1.4(1.0 - 1.9)]以及出生在国外[比值比1.8(1.1 - 3.1)]呈正相关。对“德语”的偏好与女性[比值比:1.5(1.1 - 2.1)]呈正相关。对“相同文化背景”的偏好与年龄[比值比1.0(1.0 - 1.1)]、与伴侣或配偶同住[比值比1.4(1.0 - 1.9)]以及东德地区[比值比1.9(1.3 - 2.7)]呈正相关。对“外表整洁”、“有同理心、和蔼可亲”、“准时、可靠”和“小型护理团队”的偏好与纳入的自变量均无显著关联,而对“有足够时间”的偏好与女性[比值比1.9(1.1 - 3.5)]、与伴侣或配偶同住[比值比1.9(1.1 - 3.4)]、教育程度[学徒、全日制职业学校,比值比3.1(1.3 - 7.6)]、不照顾家人/朋友[比值比1.9(1.1 - 3.3)]以及参与护理需求问题[比值比1.3(1.1 - 1.6)]呈正相关。

结论

我们的数据表明,对于德国几乎每一位65岁及以上的老年人来说,专业长期护理人员具备以下几点很重要:(i)有同理心、和蔼可亲且善解人意;(ii)准时可靠;(iii)有足够时间(例如用于交流);(iv)外表整洁。此外,发现性别或地区等几个因素与对护理人员特征的偏好有关。了解这些因素后,护理服务机构可以根据受护理者的需求调整其活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d41b/5553919/1f6d4b960605/13104_2017_2717_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d41b/5553919/1f6d4b960605/13104_2017_2717_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d41b/5553919/1f6d4b960605/13104_2017_2717_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Who should take care of me? Preferences of old age individuals for characteristics of professional long-term caregivers: an observational cross-sectional study.谁应该照顾我?老年人对专业长期护理人员特征的偏好:一项观察性横断面研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 10;10(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2717-3.
2
Factors associated with preferences for long-term care settings in old age: evidence from a population-based survey in Germany.老年长期护理机构偏好的相关因素:来自德国一项基于人群调查的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2101-y.
3
[Long-Term Care Preferences Among Individuals of Advanced Age in Germany: Results of a Population-Based Study].[德国高龄人群的长期护理偏好:一项基于人群的研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Aug;80(8-09):685-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-124663. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Correlates of preferences for autonomy in long-term care: results of a population-based survey among older individuals in Germany.长期护理中自主性偏好的相关因素:德国老年人群体基于人口调查的结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jan 4;12:71-78. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S146883. eCollection 2018.
5
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Do Individuals in Old Age Prepare for the Risk of Long-Term Care? Results of A Population-Based Survey in Germany.老年人是否为长期护理风险做准备?德国一项基于人群的调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 8;15(10):2189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102189.
7
[Who can imagine being cared for by relatives? : Results of a representative survey of 65-75-year-olds in a region in southern Germany].[谁能想象由亲属照顾呢?:德国南部某地区65 - 75岁人群的代表性调查结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jul;56(4):309-316. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02073-z. Epub 2022 May 28.
8
Effects of home-based long-term care services on caregiver health according to age.居家长期护理服务对不同年龄段照料者健康的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 23;15(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0786-6.
9
[Potential for informal care of the elderly in Germany : Results of a representative population-based survey].[德国老年人非正式照料的潜力:一项基于代表性人群调查的结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Aug;51(6):612-619. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1181-y. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
10
Association of informal caregiving with body mass index and frequency of sporting activities: evidence of a population-based study in Germany.非正式照料与体重指数及体育活动频率的关联:德国一项基于人群研究的证据
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4786-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ageing in place or stuck in place: Preferred care setting for community-dwelling older persons in a low-resource country in Sub Saharan Africa.就地老化还是被困原地:撒哈拉以南非洲资源匮乏国家中社区居住的老年人首选的护理环境。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 16;18(10):e0292939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292939. eCollection 2023.
2
Prevalence and determinants of loneliness among the oldest old living in institutionalized settings : Study findings from a representative survey.机构化环境中最年长老年人孤独感的流行率及其决定因素:一项代表性调查的研究结果。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 May;57(3):214-219. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02196-x. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
[Long-Term Care Preferences Among Individuals of Advanced Age in Germany: Results of a Population-Based Study].[德国高龄人群的长期护理偏好:一项基于人群的研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Aug;80(8-09):685-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-124663. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
2
[Potential for informal care of the elderly in Germany : Results of a representative population-based survey].[德国老年人非正式照料的潜力:一项基于代表性人群调查的结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Aug;51(6):612-619. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1181-y. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Predictors of Frailty in Old Age - Results of a Longitudinal Study.
Perceived Norms and Vaccination against COVID-19 among the General Adult Population in Germany: Results of a Nationally Representative Survey.
德国普通成年人群中对新冠疫苗接种的认知规范:一项全国代表性调查的结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Apr 4;11(4):800. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040800.
4
Which features of ambulatory healthcare are preferred by people aged 80 and over? Findings from a systematic review of qualitative studies and appraisal of confidence using GRADE-CERQual.80 岁及以上人群更喜欢哪些门诊医疗服务的特点?一项系统评价定性研究的结果,并使用 GRADE-CERQual 评估信心。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 16;22(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03006-6.
5
Renegotiating formal and informal care while ageing abroad: Older Pakistani women's healthcare access, preferences and expectations in Norway.在国外养老时重新协商正式和非正式护理:挪威的巴基斯坦老年女性的医疗保健获取、偏好与期望
J Migr Health. 2020 Sep 29;1-2:100002. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2020.100002. eCollection 2020.
6
Do Individuals in Old Age Prepare for the Risk of Long-Term Care? Results of A Population-Based Survey in Germany.老年人是否为长期护理风险做准备?德国一项基于人群的调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 8;15(10):2189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102189.
7
Correlates of preferences for autonomy in long-term care: results of a population-based survey among older individuals in Germany.长期护理中自主性偏好的相关因素:德国老年人群体基于人口调查的结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jan 4;12:71-78. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S146883. eCollection 2018.
老年衰弱的预测因素——一项纵向研究的结果。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(9):952-957. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0634-5.
4
[Longitudinal Predictors of the Need for Care].[护理需求的纵向预测因素]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Feb;79(2):73-79. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111841. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
[The Role of Preferences in the German Long-Term Care Insurance - Results from Expert Interviews].[偏好因素在德国长期护理保险中的作用——专家访谈结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Dec;79(12):1052-1057. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
6
Longitudinal predictors of informal and formal caregiving time in community-dwelling dementia patients.社区痴呆症患者非正规和正规照料时间的纵向预测因素
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;51(4):607-16. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1138-7. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
'We see it as being heterosexualised, being put into a care home': gender, sexuality and housing/care preferences among older LGB individuals in the UK.“我们认为它被异性化了,被送进了养老院”:英国老年LGB群体的性别、性取向与住房/护理偏好
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 Nov;24(6):e155-e163. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12265. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
8
The consistency of self-reported preferences for everyday living: implications for person-centered care delivery.自我报告的日常生活偏好的一致性:对以患者为中心的护理服务的影响。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 Oct;40(10):34-46. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140820-01.
9
"Keep dignity intact": exploring desires for quality long-term care among midlife women.“保持尊严不受损”:探索中年女性对优质长期护理的需求
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2013;56(8):693-708. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2013.840351. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
10
Discharge-planning for long-term care needs: the values and priorities of older people, their younger relatives and health professionals.长期护理需求的出院计划:老年人、其年轻亲属和健康专业人员的价值观与优先事项。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Mar;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00987.x. Epub 2012 Apr 13.