• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我报告的日常生活偏好的一致性:对以患者为中心的护理服务的影响。

The consistency of self-reported preferences for everyday living: implications for person-centered care delivery.

作者信息

Van Haitsma Kimberly, Abbott Katherine M, Heid Allison R, Carpenter Brian, Curyto Kimberly, Kleban Morton, Eshraghi Karen, Duntzee Christina I, Spector Abby

出版信息

J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 Oct;40(10):34-46. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140820-01.

DOI:10.3928/00989134-20140820-01
PMID:25199153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4877031/
Abstract

Preferences are the expression of an individual's basic psychosocial needs and are related to care outcomes. The current study tested the consistency of 87 individuals' everyday preferences over 1 week, comparing responses of nursing home residents (n = 37; mean age = 82) and university students (n = 50; mean age = 20). Participants completed the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory at baseline and 5 to 7 days later. Preference consistency was calculated three ways: (a) correlations (range = 0.11 to 0.90); (b) overall percent of exact agreement (e.g., response was "very important" at both time points) (66.1%); and (c) responses collapsed as "important" or "not important" (increase in percent agreement to 86.6%). Personal care preferences were more stable, whereas leisure activities were less stable. The groups did not have significant differences in consistency. Some preferences are more consistent than others; age and frailty do not appear to be related to preference instability.

摘要

偏好是个体基本心理社会需求的体现,且与护理结果相关。本研究测试了87名个体在1周内日常偏好的一致性,比较了养老院居民(n = 37;平均年龄 = 82岁)和大学生(n = 50;平均年龄 = 20岁)的回答。参与者在基线时以及5至7天后完成了《日常生活偏好量表》。偏好一致性通过三种方式计算:(a)相关性(范围 = 0.11至0.90);(b)完全一致的总体百分比(例如,两个时间点的回答均为“非常重要”)(66.1%);以及(c)回答归纳为“重要”或“不重要”(一致百分比提高到86.6%)。个人护理偏好更稳定,而休闲活动则较不稳定。两组在一致性方面没有显著差异。一些偏好比其他偏好更一致;年龄和虚弱似乎与偏好不稳定性无关。

相似文献

1
The consistency of self-reported preferences for everyday living: implications for person-centered care delivery.自我报告的日常生活偏好的一致性:对以患者为中心的护理服务的影响。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 Oct;40(10):34-46. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140820-01.
2
The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.养老院居民偏好随时间的变化。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1092-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
Preferences for Everyday Living: Understanding the Impact of Cognitive Status on Preference Importance Ratings in Nursing Homes.日常生活偏好:了解认知状态对养老院偏好重要性评分的影响。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2018 May 1;44(5):9-17. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20171002-03. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Preference Consistency: Veteran and Non-Veteran Nursing Home Resident Self-Reported Preferences for Everyday Living.偏好一致性:养老院居住的退伍军人和非退伍军人的自我报告的日常生活偏好。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Mar 1;46(3):15-25. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200129-06.
5
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
The preferences for everyday living inventory: scale development and description of psychosocial preferences responses in community-dwelling elders.日常生活偏好量表:社区居住老年人的量表编制及心理社会偏好反应描述。
Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):582-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns102. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
7
"Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.“让我感到安心自在”:养老院居民的差异化护理偏好
Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):702-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv026. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Preferences for everyday living inventory (PELI): study protocol for piloting a culture-sensitive and setting-specific translated instrument in German care settings (PELI-D).日常生活偏好量表(PELI):在德国护理环境中对文化敏感且特定环境的翻译工具进行试点研究的方案(PELI-D)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e030268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030268.
9
Important Care and Activity Preferences in a Nationally Representative Sample of Nursing Home Residents.全国代表性样本的养老院居民的重要护理和活动偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
The impact of nursing home residents' characteristics on ratings of importance of autonomy preferences in daily care over time.随着时间推移,养老院居民特征对日常护理中自主偏好重要性评级的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Aug;24(8):1334-1341. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1584875. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Gender-Specific Daily Care Preferences: Topic Modeling Study.了解特定性别的日常护理偏好:主题建模研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 29;27:e64160. doi: 10.2196/64160.
2
Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.非裔美国人和白人养老院居民的偏好重要性评分。
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;46(1):111-121. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.2007436. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
3
Assessing preferences for leisure activities of people receiving adult day services: a study protocol for concept mapping and psychometric testing.评估接受成人日间服务人群的休闲活动偏好:概念图和心理测量测试的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e055069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055069.
4
Longitudinal differences in everyday preferences: Comparisons between people with cognitive impairment and their care partners.日常偏好的纵向差异:认知障碍者与其护理伙伴之间的比较。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;37(1). doi: 10.1002/gps.5620.
5
The stability of care preferences following acute illness: a mixed methods prospective cohort study of frail older people.急性病后护理偏好的稳定性:一项针对体弱老年人的前瞻性混合方法队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01725-2.
6
A dyadic perspective on assessment in Alzheimer's dementia: Supporting both care partners across the disease continuum.阿尔茨海默病痴呆评估的二元视角:在疾病全过程中支持双方护理伙伴。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020 Aug 28;6(1):e12037. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12037. eCollection 2020.
7
Unmet and Unimportant Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents: What Are Key Resident and Facility Factors?养老院居民未得到满足且不重要的偏好:关键的居民和机构因素有哪些?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Nov;21(11):1712-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.033. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Preference Consistency: Veteran and Non-Veteran Nursing Home Resident Self-Reported Preferences for Everyday Living.偏好一致性:养老院居住的退伍军人和非退伍军人的自我报告的日常生活偏好。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Mar 1;46(3):15-25. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200129-06.
9
Preferences for everyday living inventory (PELI): study protocol for piloting a culture-sensitive and setting-specific translated instrument in German care settings (PELI-D).日常生活偏好量表(PELI):在德国护理环境中对文化敏感且特定环境的翻译工具进行试点研究的方案(PELI-D)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e030268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030268.
10
The Resident VIEW in Nursing Homes.养老院中的住院医师视角。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019 Sep 26;5:2333721419877975. doi: 10.1177/2333721419877975. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Person-Centred dementia care. Making services better Dawn Brooker Person-Centred Dementia Care. Making Services Better Jessica Kingsley 160 £14.99 1 84310 337 0 1843103370 [Formula: see text].以个人为中心的痴呆症护理。改善服务 道恩·布鲁克 以个人为中心的痴呆症护理。改善服务 杰西卡·金斯利 160页 14.99英镑 1 84310 337 0 1843103370 [公式:见正文]
Nurs Older People. 2007 Jun 1;19(5):22-23. doi: 10.7748/nop.19.5.22.s21.
2
"It Depends": Reasons Why Nursing Home Residents Change Their Minds About Care Preferences.“视情况而定”:疗养院居民改变护理偏好的原因
Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56(2):243-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu040. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
New toolkit to measure quality of person-centered care: development and pilot evaluation with nursing home communities.衡量以患者为中心护理质量的新工具包:在疗养院社区的开发与试点评估
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Sep;15(9):671-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Promoting person-centeredness in long-term care: an exploratory study.促进长期护理中的以人为本:一项探索性研究。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 Apr;40(4):46-53. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20131028-03. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
2013 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2013 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Mar;9(2):208-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.003.
6
The preferences for everyday living inventory: scale development and description of psychosocial preferences responses in community-dwelling elders.日常生活偏好量表:社区居住老年人的量表编制及心理社会偏好反应描述。
Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):582-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns102. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
7
Patient preference for and reports of provider behavior: impact of symmetry on patient outcomes.患者对提供者行为的偏好和报告:对称性对患者结局的影响。
Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):660-7. doi: 10.1037/a0016087.
8
Why not just ask the resident?为什么不直接问问住院医生呢?
J Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Nov;35(11):40-9. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20091001-01. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
9
Long-term care preferences among older adults: a moving target?老年人的长期护理偏好:一个不断变化的目标?
J Aging Soc Policy. 2008;20(2):182-200. doi: 10.1080/08959420801977574.
10
Preferences and life evaluations of older adults with and without dementia: reliability, stability, and proxy knowledge.患有和未患痴呆症的老年人的偏好与生活评估:可靠性、稳定性及代理知识
Psychol Aging. 2007 Sep;22(3):650-5. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.650.