Oksuzyan Anna, Brønnum-Hansen Henrik, Jeune Bernard
The Danish Aging Research Center, Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Eur J Ageing. 2010 Nov 4;7(4):213-218. doi: 10.1007/s10433-010-0170-4. eCollection 2010 Dec.
Men have higher death rates than women, but women do worse with regard to physical strength, disability, and other health outcomes, the so called male-female health-survival paradox. The paradox is likely to be due to multiple causes that include biological, behavioral, and social differences between the sexes. Despite decades of research on the male-female health-survival paradox, we still do not fully recognize whether behavioral factors explain most of the gender gap or whether biological and social differences contribute more substantially to the explanation of the sex differences in health and mortality. Little work has been done to investigate the magnitude of sex differences in healthy life expectancy and unhealthy life expectancy, as well as to examine the contribution of mortality and disability levels to the sex gap in health expectancy. The five selected works presented at the Réseau Espérance de Vie en Santé (REVES) Meeting 2009 in Copenhagen, and published in this issue, provide new insights into sex differences in health expectancy. The papers examine sex differences in health expectancy indicators in the EU countries, as well as trends in health expectancy in Hong Kong and in the US. They go beyond description of sex differences in health expectancy and assess the contributions of mortality and disability to gender differences in healthy life years and unhealthy life years, investigate temporal changes in sex differential health expectancy, as well as analyze contributions of time and age dimensions to the gender gap. They also show that there is still work to be done to indentify and quantify mechanisms underlying sex differences in longevity, health, and aging.
男性的死亡率高于女性,但在体力、残疾状况及其他健康指标方面,女性的表现更差,这就是所谓的男女健康-生存悖论。这种悖论可能是由多种原因造成的,包括两性之间的生物学、行为学及社会学差异。尽管对男女健康-生存悖论进行了数十年的研究,但我们仍未完全弄清楚行为因素是否能解释大部分性别差异,或者生物学和社会学差异是否对健康及死亡率方面的性别差异解释贡献更大。在调查健康预期寿命和非健康预期寿命方面的性别差异程度,以及审视死亡率和残疾水平对健康预期寿命方面性别差异的贡献方面,所做的工作很少。在2009年哥本哈根举行的健康预期寿命网络(REVES)会议上发表并在本期登出的五篇入选论文,为健康预期寿命方面的性别差异提供了新的见解。这些论文研究了欧盟国家健康预期寿命指标方面的性别差异,以及香港和美国健康预期寿命的趋势。它们不仅仅描述了健康预期寿命方面的性别差异,还评估了死亡率和残疾对健康生命年和非健康生命年中性别差异的贡献,调查了健康预期寿命性别差异的时间变化,以及分析了时间和年龄维度对性别差异的贡献。它们还表明,在确定和量化长寿、健康及衰老方面性别差异背后的机制方面,仍有工作要做。