Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Age Ageing. 2024 Aug 6;53(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae166.
Most older adults wish to remain in their homes and communities as they age. Despite this widespread preference, disparities in health outcomes and access to healthcare and social support may create inequities in the ability to age in place. Our objectives were to synthesise evidence of social inequity in ageing in place among older adults using an intersectional lens and to evaluate the methods used to define and measure inequities.
We conducted a mixed studies systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AgeLine for quantitative or qualitative literature that examined social inequities in ageing in place among adults aged 65 and older in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries. Results of included studies were synthesised using qualitative content analysis guided by the PROGRESS-Plus framework.
Of 4874 identified records, 55 studies were included. Rural residents, racial/ethnic minorities, immigrants and those with higher socioeconomic position and greater social resources are more likely to age in place. Women and those with higher educational attainment appear less likely to age in place. The influence of socioeconomic position, education and social resources differs by gender and race/ethnicity, indicating intersectional effects across social dimensions.
Social dimensions influence the ability to age in place in OECD settings, likely due to health inequalities across the lifespan, disparities in access to healthcare and support services, and different preferences regarding ageing in place. Our results can inform the development of policies and programmes to equitably support ageing in place in diverse populations.
大多数老年人希望随着年龄的增长而留在自己的家中和社区。尽管有这种广泛的偏好,但健康结果和获得医疗保健和社会支持方面的差异可能会导致在原地老龄化的能力存在不平等。我们的目标是使用交叉视角综合评估年龄在原地的老年人中社会不平等的证据,并评估用于定义和衡量不平等的方法。
我们进行了一项混合研究系统评价。我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 AgeLine 中搜索了定量或定性文献,这些文献考察了经合组织(OECD)成员国中 65 岁及以上成年人在原地老龄化方面的社会不平等。根据 PROGRESS-Plus 框架指导的定性内容分析,综合了纳入研究的结果。
在 4874 条确定的记录中,有 55 项研究被纳入。农村居民、少数族裔、移民以及那些社会经济地位较高、社会资源较多的人更有可能在原地老龄化。女性和受教育程度较高的人似乎不太可能在原地老龄化。社会经济地位、教育和社会资源的影响因性别和种族/族裔而异,这表明社会维度存在交叉影响。
在经合组织国家,社会维度影响在原地老龄化的能力,这可能是由于整个生命周期的健康不平等、获得医疗保健和支持服务的差异以及对在原地老龄化的不同偏好所致。我们的研究结果可以为制定政策和方案提供信息,以在不同人群中公平地支持在原地老龄化。