Nanda Vikas, Belure Sandeep V, Shir Ofer M
Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Biophys Rev. 2017 Aug;9(4):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s12551-017-0288-0. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
The goal of protein engineering and design is to identify sequences that adopt three-dimensional structures of desired function. Often, this is treated as a single-objective optimization problem, identifying the sequence-structure solution with the lowest computed free energy of folding. However, many design problems are multi-state, multi-specificity, or otherwise require concurrent optimization of multiple objectives. There may be tradeoffs among objectives, where improving one feature requires compromising another. The challenge lies in determining solutions that are part of the Pareto optimal set-designs where no further improvement can be achieved in any of the objectives without degrading one of the others. Pareto optimality problems are found in all areas of study, from economics to engineering to biology, and computational methods have been developed specifically to identify the Pareto frontier. We review progress in multi-objective protein design, the development of Pareto optimization methods, and present a specific case study using multi-objective optimization methods to model the tradeoff between three parameters, stability, specificity, and complexity, of a set of interacting synthetic collagen peptides.
蛋白质工程与设计的目标是识别能够形成具有所需功能三维结构的序列。通常,这被视为一个单目标优化问题,即识别具有最低计算折叠自由能的序列-结构解决方案。然而,许多设计问题是多状态、多特异性的,或者需要同时优化多个目标。目标之间可能存在权衡,即改善一个特征需要牺牲另一个特征。挑战在于确定属于帕累托最优集的解决方案——在不降低其他目标之一的情况下,无法在任何目标上进一步改进的设计。帕累托最优问题存在于从经济学到工程学再到生物学的所有研究领域,并且已经专门开发了计算方法来识别帕累托前沿。我们回顾了多目标蛋白质设计的进展、帕累托优化方法的发展,并展示了一个具体案例研究,该研究使用多目标优化方法对一组相互作用的合成胶原蛋白肽的稳定性、特异性和复杂性这三个参数之间的权衡进行建模。