Department of Radiology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China, 450008.
NEA MR Collaboration, Siemens Ltd., China, Shanghai, China, 201318.
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):780-787. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4963-0. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
To compare the T staging of resectable oesophageal cancer (OC) using radial VIBE (r-VIBE) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with pathological confirmation of the T stage.
Forty-three patients with endoscopically proven OC and indeterminate T1/T2/T3/T4a stage by computed tomography (CT) and EUS were imaged on a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. T stage was scored on MRI and EUS by two independent radiologists and one endoscopist, respectively, and compared with postoperative pathological findings. T staging agreement between r-VIBE and EUS with postoperative pathological T staging was analysed by a kappa test.
EUS and pathological T staging showed agreement of 69.8% (30/43). Radial VIBE and pathological T staging agreement was 86.0% (37/43) and 90.7% (39/43) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. High accuracy for T1/T2 stage was obtained for both r-VIBE readers (90.5% and 100% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively) and EUS reader (100%). For T3/T4, r-VIBE showed accuracy of 81.8% and 90.9% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively, while for EUS, accuracy was only 68.2% compared with pathological T staging.
Contrast-enhanced r-VIBE is comparable to EUS in T staging of resectable OC with stage of T1/T2, and is superior to EUS in staging of T3/T4 lesions.
• Radial VIBE may be useful in preoperative T staging of OC • Accuracy of staging on r-VIBE is higher in T1/2 than in T3/4 • Accuracy of EUS was 100% and 68.2% for T1/T2 and T3/T4 stage • Inter-reader agreement of T staging for r-VIBE was good.
比较径向容积内插快速扰相梯度回波(r-VIBE)与内镜超声(EUS)在经病理证实的可切除食管鳞癌(OC)T 分期中的作用。
对 43 例经内镜证实的 OC 患者进行 CT 和 EUS 检查,发现 T1/T2/T3/T4a 期不能明确的患者,在 3.0T 磁共振成像(MRI)扫描仪上进行 r-VIBE 扫描。两名独立的放射科医生和一名内镜医生分别在 MRI 和 EUS 上对 T 分期进行评分,并与术后病理结果进行比较。用 Kappa 检验分析 r-VIBE 与 EUS 与术后病理 T 分期的 T 分期一致性。
EUS 和病理 T 分期的一致性为 69.8%(30/43)。r-VIBE 与病理 T 分期的一致性为读者 1 和读者 2 分别为 86.0%(37/43)和 90.7%(39/43)。r-VIBE 读者 1 和读者 2 对 T1/T2 分期的准确率均较高(分别为 90.5%和 100%),EUS 读者的准确率为 100%。对于 T3/T4,r-VIBE 读者 1 和读者 2 的准确率分别为 81.8%和 90.9%,而 EUS 仅为 68.2%。
增强对比 r-VIBE 在可切除 OC 的 T 分期中与 EUS 相似,在 T3/T4 分期中优于 EUS。
•径向 VIBE 可能对 OC 的术前 T 分期有用•r-VIBE 分期 T1/2 比 T3/4 更准确•EUS 在 T1/T2 和 T3/T4 分期的准确率为 100%和 68.2%•r-VIBE 的 T 分期读者间一致性良好。