• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从泛欧洲视角分析福利国家针对长期老年护理的改革政策。

Analyses of welfare-state reform policies towards long-term senior care in a cross-European perspective.

作者信息

Pfau-Effinger Birgit

机构信息

University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2012 May 24;9(2):151-154. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0233-9. eCollection 2012 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s10433-012-0233-9
PMID:28804416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5547407/
Abstract

The aim of this article is to introduce a systematic, structured conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of welfare-state reform policies towards long-term senior care and the care structures in a cross-European perspective. A welfare state's policies on the long-term care of senior citizens frame the different aspects of their care: the care options of the older people, the employment situation of the different types of caregivers and the care quality. The actual structure of senior care is mainly based on the specific care-provision mix in a welfare state and on the main types of care employment. It is should not, however, be treated as a direct outcome of care policies in analyses of welfare-state policies, since the care recipients and care givers all act within the broader framework of the complex and often contradictory cultural, institutional, social and economic context-the specific 'care arrangement' of a country.

摘要

本文旨在引入一个系统、结构化的概念框架,以便从泛欧视角对福利国家针对长期老年护理的改革政策和护理结构进行比较分析。福利国家关于老年人长期护理的政策界定了护理的不同方面:老年人的护理选择、不同类型护理人员的就业状况以及护理质量。老年护理的实际结构主要基于福利国家特定的护理服务组合以及主要的护理就业类型。然而,在对福利国家政策的分析中,不应将其视为护理政策的直接结果,因为护理接受者和护理者都是在复杂且往往相互矛盾的文化、制度、社会和经济背景这一国家特定的“护理安排”的更广泛框架内行事。

相似文献

1
Analyses of welfare-state reform policies towards long-term senior care in a cross-European perspective.从泛欧洲视角分析福利国家针对长期老年护理的改革政策。
Eur J Ageing. 2012 May 24;9(2):151-154. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0233-9. eCollection 2012 Jun.
2
Social rights and employment rights related to family care: family care regimes in Europe.与家庭照料相关的社会权利和就业权利:欧洲的家庭照料制度。
J Aging Stud. 2014 Apr;29:66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
3
The Multidimensionality of Welfare State Attitudes: A European Cross-National Study.福利国家态度的多维性:一项欧洲跨国研究。
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Aug;113(1):235-255. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0099-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
4
Thoroughfares, crossroads and cul-de-sacs: drug testing of welfare recipients.大道、十字路口与死胡同:对福利领取者的药物检测
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Sep;25(5):1031-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
5
[Economization of long-term care in Great Britain, Sweden and Germany].[英国、瑞典和德国长期护理的节约化]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Oct;45(7):618-23. doi: 10.1007/s00391-012-0389-0.
6
[The Legal Duties of Long-Term Care Providers in Long-Term Care Institutions Using the Example of Fall Accidents Among Elderly Patients].
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;62(5):18-22. doi: 10.6224/JN62.5.18.
7
Home-based care provision within the German welfare mix.德国家庭护理在福利组合中的提供情况。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):274-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01057.x. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
8
Earner-carer model at the crossroads: reforms and outcomes of Sweden's family policy in comparative perspective.挣养家者-照顾者模式在十字路口:比较视角下瑞典家庭政策的改革与结果。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):373-98. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.3.a.
9
American medical policy and the "crisis" of the welfare state: a comparative perspective.美国医疗政策与福利国家的“危机”:一个比较视角
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986;11(4):617-31. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-4-617.
10
Are pro-welfare state and full-employment policies possible in the era of globalization?在全球化时代,有利于福利国家和充分就业的政策是否可行?
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(2):231-51. doi: 10.2190/HXU0-A9D9-AC7C-3WY1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Experts' Advice: Prevention and Responsibility in German Media and Scientific Discourses on Dementia.专家建议:德国媒体和科学界关于痴呆症的预防和责任论争
Qual Health Res. 2021 Sep;31(11):2005-2018. doi: 10.1177/10497323211014844. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Allocation of Eldercare Responsibilities between Children and the Government in China: Does the Sense of Injustice Matter?中国子女与政府之间养老责任的分配:不公平感重要吗?
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2019 Feb;38(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11113-018-9501-5. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Models of long-term care use among older people with disabilities in Taiwan: institutional care, community care, live-in migrant care and family care.台湾残疾老年人长期照护使用模式:机构照护、社区照护、住家外籍劳工照护和家庭照护。
Eur J Ageing. 2014 Sep 27;12(2):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0322-z. eCollection 2015 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Diversification of care policy measures supporting older people: towards greater flexibility for carers?支持老年人的护理政策措施多样化:护理人员能否获得更大灵活性?
Eur J Ageing. 2012 May 24;9(2):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0228-6. eCollection 2012 Jun.
2
Negotiating care in the context of Finnish and Italian elder care policies.在芬兰和意大利老年护理政策背景下协商护理事宜。
Eur J Ageing. 2012 May 8;9(2):131-140. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0224-x. eCollection 2012 Jun.
3
Care work in changing welfare states: Nordic care workers' experiences.福利国家变迁中的照护工作:北欧照护工作者的经历
Eur J Ageing. 2012 Mar 14;9(2):119-129. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0219-7. eCollection 2012 Jun.
4
Changing social organizations of care: a comparison of European policy reforms encouraging paid domestic work.不断变化的社会护理组织:对鼓励有偿家务劳动的欧洲政策改革的比较
Eur J Ageing. 2012 Mar 27;9(2):111-117. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0225-9. eCollection 2012 Jun.
5
Changing policies, changing patterns of care: Danish and Swedish home care at the crossroads.政策变迁,护理模式转变:丹麦与瑞典居家护理处于十字路口
Eur J Ageing. 2012 Jan 26;9(2):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0209-1. eCollection 2012 Jun.
6
Guest editorial: Shifting boundaries of elder care: changing roles and responsibilities.客座社论:老年护理的界限转变:角色与责任的变化
Eur J Ageing. 2012 May 8;9(2):97-99. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0231-y. eCollection 2012 Jun.