• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不断变化的社会护理组织:对鼓励有偿家务劳动的欧洲政策改革的比较

Changing social organizations of care: a comparison of European policy reforms encouraging paid domestic work.

作者信息

Kvist Elin

机构信息

Umeå Centre for Gender Studies, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2012 Mar 27;9(2):111-117. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0225-9. eCollection 2012 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s10433-012-0225-9
PMID:28804412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5547404/
Abstract

In many European countries different types of policy reforms intending to encourage growth in the domestic service sector have been introduced. The methods and reforms differ but mainly the reforms intend to stimulate growth of a 'new' legal labour market sector within private households. This potential growth sector in combination with insufficient or declining welfare states, inclining female labour market participation and ageing populations could be viewed as explanatory factors to the increased demand for domestic services. A growing amount of those performing paid domestic work in European homes are migrant women with or without papers. The aim of this article is to create a model that enables comparisons of these reforms, with a special focus on changing social organizations of care for elders, children and other dependent persons. Included in the analysis are European countries that have introduced wide domestic service policy reforms as measurement to encourage growth in the domestic service sector, i.e. Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany and Sweden.

摘要

在许多欧洲国家,已经出台了不同类型旨在鼓励家庭服务部门增长的政策改革措施。这些方法和改革各有不同,但主要目的是刺激私人家庭内部一个“新的”合法劳动力市场部门的增长。这个潜在的增长部门,再加上福利国家的不足或衰退、女性劳动力市场参与度的上升以及人口老龄化,可被视为家庭服务需求增加的解释性因素。在欧洲家庭中从事有偿家务工作的人中,越来越多的是有证件或无证件的移民妇女。本文的目的是创建一个能够对这些改革进行比较的模型,特别关注对老年人、儿童和其他受抚养人的照料社会组织的变化。纳入分析的欧洲国家包括那些已经推行广泛的家庭服务政策改革以作为鼓励家庭服务部门增长措施的国家,即奥地利、比利时、丹麦、芬兰、法国、德国和瑞典。

相似文献

1
Changing social organizations of care: a comparison of European policy reforms encouraging paid domestic work.不断变化的社会护理组织:对鼓励有偿家务劳动的欧洲政策改革的比较
Eur J Ageing. 2012 Mar 27;9(2):111-117. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0225-9. eCollection 2012 Jun.
2
Managing the health care market in developing countries: prospects and problems.发展中国家医疗保健市场的管理:前景与问题
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Sep;9(3):237-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.3.237.
3
The impact of slow economic growth on health sector reform: a cross-national perspective.经济增长缓慢对卫生部门改革的影响:跨国视角。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jul;13(3-4):382-405. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000445. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
Home care in Austria: the interplay of family orientation, cash-for-care and migrant care.奥地利的家庭护理:家庭导向、现金换护理和移民护理的相互作用。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):265-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01049.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
5
Legal abortion in Europe.欧洲的合法堕胎
IPPF Eur Reg Inf. 1978 Jan;7(1):1-8.
6
Private initiatives and policy options: recent health system experience in India.私营部门举措与政策选择:印度近期的卫生系统经验
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Mar;16(1):87-97. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.1.87.
7
Prospects for European labour demand.欧洲劳动力需求前景。
Eur J Popul. 1988 Jul;3(3-4):383-410. doi: 10.1007/BF01796906.
8
Similar and yet so different: cash-for-care in six European countries' long-term care policies.相似而又不同:六个欧洲国家长期护理政策中的现金换护理。
Milbank Q. 2010 Sep;88(3):286-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00601.x.
9
Caregiver credits in France, Germany, and Sweden: lessons for the United States.法国、德国和瑞典的护理者信贷政策:给美国的启示。
Soc Secur Bull. 2011;71(4):61-76.
10
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Precarious employment and mental health in the Belgian service voucher system: the role of working conditions and perceived financial strain.比利时服务券制度中的不稳定就业与心理健康:工作条件和感知财务压力的作用。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 May;97(4):435-450. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02057-z. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Who would rescue the dilemma of Chinese elderly care? An evolutionary game analysis and simulation research on the formalization of the domestic service industry with subsidy policy.谁来解救中国式养老困局?补贴政策下的家政服务业正规化的演化博弈分析与仿真研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 21;11:1111208. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111208. eCollection 2023.
3
Whose responsibility? Elder support norms regarding the provision and financing of assistance with daily activities across economically developed countries.谁的责任?经济发达国家中关于提供日常活动协助及资助的老年人赡养规范。
Eur J Ageing. 2019 May 10;17(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s10433-019-00515-z. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Analyses of welfare-state reform policies towards long-term senior care in a cross-European perspective.从泛欧洲视角分析福利国家针对长期老年护理的改革政策。
Eur J Ageing. 2012 May 24;9(2):151-154. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0233-9. eCollection 2012 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states.社会关怀的概念与当代福利国家分析。
Br J Sociol. 2000 Jun;51(2):281-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x.