University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jan;55(1):117-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
As children with life-limiting illnesses (LLIs) and life-threatening illnesses (LTIs) live longer, challenges to meeting their complex health care needs arise in homes and communities, as well as in hospitals. Integrated knowledge regarding community-based pediatric palliative care (CBPPC) is needed to strategically plan for a seamless continuum of care for children and their families.
The purpose of this integrative review article is to explore factors that are associated with the use of CBPPC for U.S. children with LLIs and LTIs and their families.
A literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Google Scholar, and an ancestry search was performed to identify empirical studies and program evaluations published between 2000 and 2016. The methodological protocol included an evaluation of empirical quality and explicit data collection of synthesis procedures.
Forty peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative methodological interdisciplinary articles were included in the final sample. Patient characteristics such as older age and a solid tumor cancer diagnosis and interpersonal factors such as family support were associated with higher CBPPC use. Organizational features were the most frequently discussed factors that increased CBPPC, including the importance of interprofessional hospice services and interorganizational care coordination for supporting the child and family at home. Finally, geography, concurrent care and hospice eligibility regulations, and funding and reimbursement mechanisms were associated with CBPPC use on a community and systemic level.
Multilevel factors are associated with increased CBPPC use for children with LLIs or LTIs and their families in the U.S.
随着患有绝症和危及生命疾病的儿童寿命延长,他们在家庭和社区中,以及在医院中,都面临着满足其复杂医疗需求的挑战。为了为儿童及其家庭战略性规划无缝的连续护理,需要整合有关基于社区的儿科姑息治疗(CBPPC)的知识。
本文综合评论文章的目的是探讨与美国患有绝症和危及生命疾病的儿童及其家庭使用 CBPPC 相关的因素。
对 PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、Google Scholar 以及追溯性搜索进行了文献检索,以确定 2000 年至 2016 年间发表的实证研究和方案评估。方法学方案包括对实证质量的评估和对综合程序的明确数据收集。
最终样本包括 40 篇经过同行评审的定量和定性跨学科文章。患者特征,如年龄较大和患有实体瘤癌症,以及人际因素,如家庭支持,与更高的 CBPPC 使用相关。组织特征是增加 CBPPC 最常讨论的因素,包括姑息治疗服务的多专业团队和跨组织的护理协调,以支持儿童和家庭在家中。最后,地理、并存护理和临终关怀资格法规以及资金和报销机制与社区和系统层面的 CBPPC 使用相关。
多层次因素与美国患有绝症或危及生命疾病的儿童及其家庭中 CBPPC 使用的增加相关。