Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing (J.Y.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care (J.F.B.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; Center for Clinical and Translational Research (J.F.B.), Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):e483-e495. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
Pediatric palliative care (PPC) programs vary widely in structure, staffing, funding, and patient census, resulting in inconsistency in service provision. Improving the quality of palliative care for children living with serious illness and their families requires measuring care quality, ensuring that quality measurement is embedded into day-to-day clinical practice, and aligning quality measurement with healthcare policy priorities. Yet, numerous challenges exist in measuring PPC quality. This paper provides an overview of PPC quality measurement, including challenges, current initiatives, and future opportunities. While important strides toward addressing quality measurement challenges in PPC have been made, including ongoing quality measurement initiatives like the Cambia Metrics Project, the PPC What Matters Most study, and collaborative learning networks, more work remains. Providing high-quality PPC to all children and families will require a multi-pronged approach. In this paper, we suggest several strategies for advancing high-quality PPC, which includes 1) considering how and by whom success is defined, 2) evaluating, adapting, and developing PPC measures, including those that address care disparities within PPC for historically marginalized and excluded communities, 3) improving the infrastructure with which to routinely and prospectively measure, monitor, and report clinical and administrative quality measures, 4) increasing endorsement of PPC quality measures by prominent quality organizations to facilitate accountability and possible reimbursement, and 5) integrating PPC-specific quality measures into the administrative, funding, and policy landscape of pediatric healthcare.
儿科舒缓治疗(PPC)项目在结构、人员配备、资金和患者数量方面差异很大,导致服务提供不一致。为了提高患有严重疾病的儿童及其家庭的姑息治疗质量,需要衡量护理质量,确保质量衡量标准嵌入日常临床实践中,并使质量衡量标准与医疗保健政策重点保持一致。然而,在衡量 PPC 质量方面存在诸多挑战。本文概述了 PPC 质量衡量标准,包括挑战、当前举措和未来机遇。虽然在解决 PPC 质量衡量方面已经取得了重要进展,包括正在进行的质量衡量举措,如 Cambia 指标项目、PPC 最重要的研究和协作学习网络,但仍有更多工作要做。为所有儿童和家庭提供高质量的 PPC 需要采取多管齐下的方法。在本文中,我们提出了一些推进高质量 PPC 的策略,包括 1)考虑如何以及由谁来定义成功,2)评估、调整和开发 PPC 措施,包括那些针对历史上被边缘化和被排斥的社区的 PPC 护理差距的措施,3)改善基础设施,以便定期和前瞻性地衡量、监测和报告临床和行政质量措施,4)通过有影响力的质量组织增加对 PPC 质量措施的认可,以促进问责制和可能的报销,5)将 PPC 特定的质量措施整合到儿科医疗保健的行政、资金和政策环境中。