Han Zifeng, Willer Thomas, Li Li, Pielsticker Colin, Rychlik Ivan, Velge Philippe, Kaspers Bernd, Rautenschlein Silke
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Clinic for Poultry, Hannover, Germany.
Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Infect Immun. 2017 Oct 18;85(11). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00380-17. Print 2017 Nov.
The -host interaction may be affected by the host's gut microbiota through competitive exclusion, metabolites, or modification of the immune response. To understand this interaction, colonization and local immune responses were compared in chickens with different gut microbiota compositions. Birds were treated with an antibiotic cocktail (AT) (experiments 1 and 2) or raised under germfree (GF) conditions (experiment 3). At 18 days posthatch (dph), they were orally inoculated either with 10 CFU of or with diluent. Cecal as well as systemic colonization, T- and B-cell numbers in the gut, and gut-associated tissue were compared between the different groups. Significantly higher numbers of CFU of were detected in the cecal contents of AT and GF birds, with higher colonization rates in spleen, liver, and ileum, than in birds with a conventional gut microbiota ( < 0.05). Significant upregulation of T and B lymphocyte numbers was detected in cecum, cecal tonsils, and bursa of Fabricius of AT or GF birds after inoculation compared to the respective controls ( < 0.05). This difference was less clear in birds with a conventional gut microbiota. Histopathological gut lesions were observed only in -inoculated AT and GF birds but not in microbiota-colonized -inoculated hatchmates. These results demonstrate that the gut microbiota may contribute to the control of colonization and prevent lesion development. Further studies are needed to identify key players of the gut microbiota and the mechanisms behind their protective role.
宿主与(某种病原体,原文未明确写出)的相互作用可能会受到宿主肠道微生物群的影响,其作用方式包括竞争排斥、产生代谢产物或改变免疫反应。为了解这种相互作用,研究人员比较了具有不同肠道微生物群组成的鸡的(病原体)定植情况和局部免疫反应。实验中,鸡被给予抗生素鸡尾酒(实验1和2)或在无菌(GF)条件下饲养(实验3)。在孵化后18天(dph),它们经口接种10 CFU的(病原体)或稀释剂。比较了不同组之间盲肠以及全身的(病原体)定植情况、肠道中的T细胞和B细胞数量以及肠道相关组织。与具有传统肠道微生物群的鸡相比,在抗生素处理组(AT)和无菌组(GF)鸡的盲肠内容物中检测到的(病原体)CFU数量显著更高,在脾脏、肝脏和回肠中的定植率也更高(P<0.05)。与各自的对照组相比,接种(病原体)后,在AT组或GF组鸡的盲肠、盲肠扁桃体和法氏囊中检测到T和B淋巴细胞数量显著上调(P<0.05)。在具有传统肠道微生物群的鸡中,这种差异不太明显。仅在接种(病原体)的AT组和GF组鸡中观察到组织病理学肠道病变,而在有微生物群定植的接种(病原体)的同窝鸡中未观察到。这些结果表明,肠道微生物群可能有助于控制(病原体)定植并预防病变发展。需要进一步研究以确定肠道微生物群的关键成分及其保护作用背后的机制。