Li Jijun, Zhao Chunwang, Xing Yongming, Su Shaojian, Cheng Buwen
College of Science, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China.
College of Information Science and Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Materials (Basel). 2013 May 24;6(6):2130-2142. doi: 10.3390/ma6062130.
The misfit dislocations and strain fields at a Ge/Si heterostructure interface were investigated experimentally using a combination of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and quantitative electron micrograph analysis methods. The type of misfit dislocation at the interface was determined to be 60° dislocation and 90° full-edge dislocation. The full-field strains at the Ge/Si heterostructure interface were mapped by using the geometric phase analysis (GPA) and peak pairs analysis (PPA), respectively. The effect of the mask size on the GPA and PPA results was analyzed in detail. For comparison, the theoretical strain fields of the misfit dislocations were also calculated by the Peierls-Nabarro and Foreman dislocation models. The results showed that the optimal mask sizes in GPA and PPA were approximately three tenths and one-tenth of the reciprocal lattice vector, respectively. The Foreman dislocation model with an alterable factor = 4 can best describe the strain field of the misfit dislocation at the Ge/Si heterostructure interface.
利用高分辨率透射电子显微镜和定量电子显微照片分析方法相结合,对Ge/Si异质结构界面处的失配位错和应变场进行了实验研究。确定界面处失配位错的类型为60°位错和90°全位错。分别使用几何相位分析(GPA)和峰对分析(PPA)绘制了Ge/Si异质结构界面处的全场应变。详细分析了掩模尺寸对GPA和PPA结果的影响。为作比较,还通过佩尔斯-纳巴罗和福尔曼位错模型计算了失配位错的理论应变场。结果表明,GPA和PPA中的最佳掩模尺寸分别约为倒易晶格矢量的十分之三分之一和十分之一。可变因子 = 4的福尔曼位错模型能够最好地描述Ge/Si异质结构界面处失配位错的应变场。