Suppr超能文献

在线和移动电话应用程序(“应用”)用于自杀意念和自我伤害自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of online and mobile telephone applications ('apps') for the self-management of suicidal ideation and self-harm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Witt Katrina, Spittal Matthew J, Carter Gregory, Pirkis Jane, Hetrick Sarah, Currier Dianne, Robinson Jo, Milner Allison

机构信息

Population Health, Turning Point, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, 54-62 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 15;17(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1458-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online and mobile telephone applications ('apps') have the potential to improve the scalability of effective interventions for suicidal ideation and self-harm. The aim of this review was therefore to investigate the effectiveness of digital interventions for the self-management of suicidal ideation or self-harm.

METHODS

Seven databases (Applied Science & Technology; CENTRAL; CRESP; Embase; Global Health; PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; Medline) were searched to 31 March, 2017. Studies that examined the effectiveness of digital interventions for suicidal ideation and/or self-harm, or which reported outcome data for suicidal ideation and/or self-harm, within a randomised controlled trial (RCT), pseudo-RCT, or observational pre-test/post-test design were included in the review.

RESULTS

Fourteen non-overlapping studies were included, reporting data from a total of 3,356 participants. Overall, digital interventions were associated with reductions for suicidal ideation scores at post-intervention. There was no evidence of a treatment effect for self-harm or attempted suicide.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies were biased in relation to at least one aspect of study design, and particularly the domains of participant, clinical personnel, and outcome assessor blinding. Performance and detection bias therefore cannot be ruled out. Digital interventions for suicidal ideation and self-harm may be more effective than waitlist control. It is unclear whether these reductions would be clinically meaningful at present. Further evidence, particularly with regards to the potential mechanisms of action of these interventions, as well as safety, is required before these interventions could recommended.

摘要

背景

在线和移动电话应用程序(“应用”)有潜力提高针对自杀意念和自我伤害的有效干预措施的可扩展性。因此,本综述的目的是调查数字干预措施对自杀意念或自我伤害自我管理的有效性。

方法

检索了七个数据库(应用科学与技术;CENTRAL;CRESP;Embase;全球健康;PsycARTICLES;PsycINFO;Medline),检索截至2017年3月31日的文献。纳入综述的研究需在随机对照试验(RCT)、伪随机对照试验或观察性预测试/后测试设计中,检验数字干预措施对自杀意念和/或自我伤害的有效性,或报告自杀意念和/或自我伤害的结果数据。

结果

纳入了14项不重叠的研究,共报告了3356名参与者的数据。总体而言,数字干预措施与干预后自杀意念得分的降低有关。没有证据表明对自我伤害或自杀未遂有治疗效果。

结论

大多数研究在研究设计的至少一个方面存在偏倚,尤其是在参与者、临床人员和结果评估者盲法等领域。因此不能排除表现偏倚和检测偏倚。针对自杀意念和自我伤害的数字干预措施可能比等待名单对照更有效。目前尚不清楚这些降低在临床上是否有意义。在推荐这些干预措施之前,需要更多证据,特别是关于这些干预措施潜在作用机制以及安全性的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/931e/5558658/99a076c072cf/12888_2017_1458_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验