• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于表型和机器学习技术的温室生产中植物根区水分状况的判别。

Discrimination of plant root zone water status in greenhouse production based on phenotyping and machine learning techniques.

机构信息

School of agriculture and biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08235-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-08235-z
PMID:28811508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5557858/
Abstract

Plant-based sensing on water stress can provide sensitive and direct reference for precision irrigation system in greenhouse. However, plant information acquisition, interpretation, and systematical application remain insufficient. This study developed a discrimination method for plant root zone water status in greenhouse by integrating phenotyping and machine learning techniques. Pakchoi plants were used and treated by three root zone moisture levels, 40%, 60%, and 80% relative water content. Three classification models, Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were developed and validated in different scenarios with overall accuracy over 90% for all. SVM model had the highest value, but it required the longest training time. All models had accuracy over 85% in all scenarios, and more stable performance was observed in RF model. Simplified SVM model developed by the top five most contributing traits had the largest accuracy reduction as 29.5%, while simplified RF and NN model still maintained approximately 80%. For real case application, factors such as operation cost, precision requirement, and system reaction time should be synthetically considered in model selection. Our work shows it is promising to discriminate plant root zone water status by implementing phenotyping and machine learning techniques for precision irrigation management.

摘要

基于植物的水分胁迫感知可以为温室精准灌溉系统提供敏感和直接的参考。然而,植物信息的获取、解释和系统应用仍然不足。本研究通过整合表型和机器学习技术,开发了一种用于温室植物根区水分状况的判别方法。选用小白菜植物,采用三种根区水分水平(相对含水量的 40%、60%和 80%)进行处理。在不同的情况下,开发并验证了三种分类模型,即随机森林(RF)、神经网络(NN)和支持向量机(SVM),所有模型的整体准确率均超过 90%。SVM 模型具有最高的准确率,但需要最长的训练时间。所有模型在所有情况下的准确率均超过 85%,RF 模型表现出更稳定的性能。通过前五个最具贡献特征简化的 SVM 模型的准确率降低最大,为 29.5%,而简化的 RF 和 NN 模型仍保持在 80%左右。对于实际案例应用,在模型选择中应综合考虑运营成本、精度要求和系统反应时间等因素。我们的工作表明,通过实施表型和机器学习技术进行精准灌溉管理,对植物根区水分状况进行判别是有前景的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/cad0c6650f68/41598_2017_8235_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/dcd1727b7de6/41598_2017_8235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/4e562099f90f/41598_2017_8235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/d6c1fa85ef6a/41598_2017_8235_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/35d1d14eece9/41598_2017_8235_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/b974bb78e8c2/41598_2017_8235_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/cad0c6650f68/41598_2017_8235_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/dcd1727b7de6/41598_2017_8235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/4e562099f90f/41598_2017_8235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/d6c1fa85ef6a/41598_2017_8235_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/35d1d14eece9/41598_2017_8235_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/b974bb78e8c2/41598_2017_8235_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ca/5557858/cad0c6650f68/41598_2017_8235_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrimination of plant root zone water status in greenhouse production based on phenotyping and machine learning techniques.基于表型和机器学习技术的温室生产中植物根区水分状况的判别。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08235-z.
2
Phenotyping: Using Machine Learning for Improved Pairwise Genotype Classification Based on Root Traits.表型分析:基于根系性状利用机器学习改进成对基因型分类
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 6;7:1864. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01864. eCollection 2016.
3
Non-Invasive Sensing of Nitrogen in Plant Using Digital Images and Machine Learning for ssp. L.利用数字图像和机器学习对 ssp. L. 进行植物氮的非侵入式感应
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 29;19(11):2448. doi: 10.3390/s19112448.
4
An explainable deep machine vision framework for plant stress phenotyping.用于植物胁迫表型分析的可解释深度机器视觉框架
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 1;115(18):4613-4618. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716999115. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
Data-mining Techniques for Image-based Plant Phenotypic Traits Identification and Classification.基于图像的植物表型特征识别和分类的数据挖掘技术。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 20;9(1):19526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55609-6.
6
An automated, high-throughput plant phenotyping system using machine learning-based plant segmentation and image analysis.一种基于机器学习的植物分割和图像分析的自动化、高通量植物表型系统。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 27;13(4):e0196615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196615. eCollection 2018.
7
Data Mining and NIR Spectroscopy in Viticulture: Applications for Plant Phenotyping under Field Conditions.葡萄栽培中的数据挖掘与近红外光谱:田间条件下植物表型分析的应用
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Feb 16;16(2):236. doi: 10.3390/s16020236.
8
Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants.基于机器学习的高通量植物胁迫表型分析。
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Feb;21(2):110-124. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
9
Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.用于乳腺癌生存预测的机器学习模型。
Technol Health Care. 2016;24(1):31-42. doi: 10.3233/THC-151071.
10
Deep machine learning provides state-of-the-art performance in image-based plant phenotyping.深度学习在基于图像的植物表型分析中提供了最先进的性能。
Gigascience. 2017 Oct 1;6(10):1-10. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix083.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal phenotypic variation of spinach root traits and its relation to shoot performance.菠菜根系性状的时间表型变异及其与地上部性能的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 8;14(1):3233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53798-3.
2
Roles of DNA Methylation in Cold Priming in Tartary Buckwheat.DNA甲基化在苦荞冷引发中的作用
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 7;11:608540. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.608540. eCollection 2020.
3
Optical Flow-Based Analysis of the Relationships between Leaf Wilting and Stem Diameter Variations in Tomato Plants.基于光流的番茄植株叶片萎蔫与茎直径变化关系分析

本文引用的文献

1
Phenotyping: Using Machine Learning for Improved Pairwise Genotype Classification Based on Root Traits.表型分析:基于根系性状利用机器学习改进成对基因型分类
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 6;7:1864. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01864. eCollection 2016.
2
Machine Learning and Computer Vision System for Phenotype Data Acquisition and Analysis in Plants.用于植物表型数据采集与分析的机器学习和计算机视觉系统
Sensors (Basel). 2016 May 5;16(5):641. doi: 10.3390/s16050641.
3
Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants.基于机器学习的高通量植物胁迫表型分析。
Plant Phenomics. 2019 Oct 31;2019:9136298. doi: 10.34133/2019/9136298. eCollection 2019.
4
Artificial intelligence in the water domain: Opportunities for responsible use.人工智能在水域领域:负责任使用的机会。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 1):142561. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142561. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Non-destructive monitoring of netted muskmelon quality based on its external phenotype using Random Forest.基于随机森林的网纹甜瓜外部表型的无损监测。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 19;14(8):e0221259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221259. eCollection 2019.
6
Crop Phenomics: Current Status and Perspectives.作物表型组学:现状与展望
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jun 3;10:714. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00714. eCollection 2019.
7
A Phenotype-Based Approach for the Substrate Water Status Forecast of Greenhouse Netted Muskmelon.基于表型的温室网纹甜瓜基质水分状况预测方法
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 13;19(12):2673. doi: 10.3390/s19122673.
8
Non-Invasive Sensing of Nitrogen in Plant Using Digital Images and Machine Learning for ssp. L.利用数字图像和机器学习对 ssp. L. 进行植物氮的非侵入式感应
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 29;19(11):2448. doi: 10.3390/s19112448.
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Feb;21(2):110-124. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
4
Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development.用于植物生长和发育研究的高级表型分析及表型数据分析
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Aug 10;6:619. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00619. eCollection 2015.
5
Automatic detection of diseased tomato plants using thermal and stereo visible light images.利用热成像和立体可见光图像自动检测患病番茄植株
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 10;10(4):e0123262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123262. eCollection 2015.
6
Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions.整合数据以揭示基因型-表型相互作用的方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Feb;16(2):85-97. doi: 10.1038/nrg3868. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
7
Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growth and drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis.基于高通量图像分析剖析作物生长和干旱响应的表型组成部分。
Plant Cell. 2014 Dec;26(12):4636-55. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.129601. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
8
A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping.植物表型成像技术综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Oct 24;14(11):20078-111. doi: 10.3390/s141120078.
9
Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods.灌溉调度:基于作物的方法的优点与陷阱
J Exp Bot. 2004 Nov;55(407):2427-36. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh213. Epub 2004 Jul 30.
10
Machine vision extracted plant movement for early detection of plant water stress.机器视觉提取植物运动以早期检测植物水分胁迫。
Trans ASAE. 2002 Jul-Aug;45(4):1147-53. doi: 10.13031/2013.9923.