Suppr超能文献

巴基斯坦成年人身体脂肪的估计:基于皮褶厚度测量的公式比较。

Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements.

作者信息

Naz Hafeeza, Mushtaq Kinza, Butt Bilal Azeem, Khawaja Khadija Irfan

机构信息

Dr. Hafeeza Naz, FCPS. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Services Hospital/SIMS Lahore, Pakistan.

Dr. Kinza Mushtaq, MBBS. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Services Hospital/SIMS Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2017 May-Jun;33(3):635-639. doi: 10.12669/pjms.333.12806.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare three different body fats estimation equations using skin fold measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis.

METHODS

A total of 130 subjects were included from Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Services Hospital, Lahore from 1 April 2016 to 30 Sep. 2016. The triceps, biceps, subscapular, chest, thigh, abdominal, suprailiac skinfold thickness of the subjects was measured with skin-fold calipers (Harpenden) on non-dominant side. The percentage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skin-fold-thickness equations namely Durnin & Womersley, Jackson & Pollock and Sloan was compared with %FM measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA).

RESULTS

The mean age of subjects was 48.75±10.7 years, mean BMI was 29.08±6.09 kg/m. The mean %FM calculated by Durnin & Womersley (32.408±0.584), Jackson & Pollock (24.658±0.527), Sloan (20.40±0.545). The %FM by BIA was 38.182±0.529. All three equations showed positive correlation but underestimated %FM as compared to BIA.

CONCLUSION

All three BF estimation equations underestimate body fat percentage compared to BIA. Among the three, Durnin & Womersley equation shows best positive correlation and hence it can be used for estimation of percentage fat mass as an alternate to BIA.

摘要

目的

比较三种不同的利用皮褶测量与生物电阻抗分析来估算体脂的方程。

方法

2016年4月1日至2016年9月30日期间,从拉合尔服务医院内分泌与代谢科纳入了总共130名受试者。使用皮褶卡尺(哈彭登式)在非优势侧测量受试者的肱三头肌、肱二头肌、肩胛下、胸部、大腿、腹部、髂上皮肤褶厚度。将使用每个皮褶厚度方程(即杜宁与沃姆斯利方程、杰克逊与波洛克方程和斯隆方程)预测的脂肪量百分比(%FM)与使用生物电阻抗分析仪(BIA)测量的%FM进行比较。

结果

受试者的平均年龄为48.75±10.7岁,平均体重指数为29.08±6.09kg/m²。杜宁与沃姆斯利方程计算的平均%FM为(32.408±0.584),杰克逊与波洛克方程为(24.658±0.527),斯隆方程为(20.40±0.545)。BIA测量的%FM为38.182±0.529。所有三个方程均显示出正相关性,但与BIA相比,均低估了%FM。

结论

与BIA相比,所有三个体脂估算方程均低估了体脂百分比。在这三个方程中,杜宁与沃姆斯利方程显示出最佳的正相关性,因此它可作为BIA的替代方法用于估算脂肪量百分比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d49/5510117/d4bf73fa4329/PJMS-33-635-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验