Weijs Teus J, van Eden Hanneke W J, Ruurda Jelle P, Luyer Misha D P, Steenhagen Elles, Nieuwenhuijzen Grard A P, van Hillegersberg Richard
Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S851-S860. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.73.
Malnutrition is an important problem following esophagectomy. A surgically placed jejunostomy secures an enteral feeding route, facilitating discharge with home-tube feeding and long-term nutritional support. However, specific complications occur, and data are lacking that support its use over other enteral feeding routes. Therefore routine jejunostomy tube feeding and discharge with home-tube feeding was evaluated, with emphasis on weight loss, length of stay and re-admissions.
Consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, with gastric tube reconstruction and jejunostomy creation, were analyzed. Two different regimens were compared. Before January 07, 2011 patients were discharged when oral intake was sufficient, without tube feeding. After that discharge with home-tube feeding was routinely performed. Logistic regression analysis corrected for confounders.
Some 236 patients were included. The median duration of tube feeding was 35 days. Reoperation for a jejunostomy-related complication was needed in 2%. The median body mass index (BMI) remained stable during tube feeding. The BMI decreased significantly after stopping tube feeding: from 25.6 (1st-3rd quartile 23.0-28.6) kg/m to 24.4 (22.0-27.1) kg/m at 30 days later [median weight loss: 3.0 (1.0-5.3) kg; 3.9% (1.5-6.3%)]. Weight loss was not affected by the duration of tube feeding duration. Routine home-tube feeding did not affect weight loss, admission time or the readmission rate.
Weight loss following esophagectomy occurs once that tube feeding is stopped, independently from the time interval after esophagectomy. Moreover routine discharge with home-tube feeding does not reduce length of stay or readmissions. These findings question the value of routine jejunostomy placement and emphasize the need for further research.
营养不良是食管切除术后的一个重要问题。手术放置空肠造口可确保肠内营养途径,便于出院后家庭管饲和长期营养支持。然而,会出现特定并发症,且缺乏支持其优于其他肠内营养途径的数据。因此,对常规空肠造口管饲及出院后家庭管饲进行了评估,重点关注体重减轻、住院时间和再入院情况。
对连续接受食管癌切除术、行胃管重建和空肠造口术的患者进行分析。比较了两种不同方案。2011年1月7日前,患者在经口摄入量充足且无需管饲时出院。此后,常规进行出院后家庭管饲。采用逻辑回归分析校正混杂因素。
共纳入约236例患者。管饲的中位持续时间为35天。2%的患者因空肠造口相关并发症需要再次手术。管饲期间中位体重指数(BMI)保持稳定。停止管饲后BMI显著下降:30天后从25.6(第1-3四分位数23.0-28.6)kg/m降至24.4(22.0-27.1)kg/m[中位体重减轻:3.0(1.0-5.3)kg;3.9%(1.5-6.3%)]。体重减轻不受管饲持续时间的影响。常规家庭管饲不影响体重减轻、入院时间或再入院率。
食管切除术后,一旦停止管饲就会出现体重减轻,与食管切除术后的时间间隔无关。此外,常规出院后家庭管饲并不能缩短住院时间或降低再入院率。这些发现质疑了常规放置空肠造口的价值,并强调了进一步研究的必要性。