Craver Christopher, Belk Kathy W, Myers Gerard J
1 Vizient Inc., Health Data analytics, Irving, TX, USA.
2 University of North Carolina-Charlotte, College of Health and Human Services, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Perfusion. 2018 Jan;33(1):44-52. doi: 10.1177/0267659117723698. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
Historically, perioperative hemoglobin monitoring has relied on calculated saturation, using blood gas devices that measure plasma hematocrit (Hct). Co-oximetry, which measures total hemoglobin (tHb), yields a more comprehensive assessment of hemodilution. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of tHb measurement by co-oximetry and Hct, using conductivity with red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, length of stay (LOS) and inpatient costs in patients having major cardiac surgery.
A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or valve replacement (VR) procedures from January 2014 to June 2016, using MedAssets discharge data. The patient population was sub-divided by the measurement modality (tHb and Hct), using detailed billing records and Current Procedural Terminology coding. Cost was calculated using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify significant drivers of RBC transfusion and resource utilization.
The study population included 18,169 cardiovascular surgery patients. Hct-monitored patients accounted for 66% of the population and were more likely to have dual CABG and VR procedures (10.4% vs 8.9%, p=0.0069). After controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, as well as patient comorbidities, Hct-monitored patients had significantly higher RBC transfusion risk (OR=1.26, CI 1.15-1.38, p<0.0001), longer LOS (IRR=1.08, p<0.0001) and higher costs (IRR=1.15, p<0.0001) than tHb-monitored patients. RBC transfusions were a significant driver of LOS (IRR=1.25, p<0.0001) and cost (IRR=1.22, p<0.0001).
tHb monitoring during cardiovascular surgery could offer a significant reduction in RBC transfusion, length of stay and hospital cost compared to Hct monitoring.
从历史上看,围手术期血红蛋白监测一直依赖于通过测量血浆血细胞比容(Hct)的血气设备来计算饱和度。而测量总血红蛋白(tHb)的共血氧测定法能对血液稀释进行更全面的评估。本研究的目的是通过共血氧测定法检查tHb测量值与Hct之间的关联,并探讨其与接受心脏大手术患者的红细胞(RBC)输血、住院时间(LOS)和住院费用之间的关系。
利用MedAssets出院数据,对2014年1月至2016年6月期间接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和/或瓣膜置换术(VR)的患者进行回顾性研究。使用详细的计费记录和当前程序术语编码,根据测量方式(tHb和Hct)对患者群体进行细分。费用是使用特定医院的成本与收费比率计算得出的。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定RBC输血和资源利用的重要驱动因素。
研究人群包括18169例心血管手术患者。Hct监测组患者占总人群的66%,且更有可能接受双CABG和VR手术(10.4%对8.9%,p = 0.0069)。在控制了患者和医院特征以及患者合并症后,与tHb监测组患者相比,Hct监测组患者的RBC输血风险显著更高(OR = 1.26,CI 1.15 - 1.38,p < 0.0001),住院时间更长(IRR = 1.08,p < 0.0001),费用更高(IRR = 1.15,p < 0.0001)。RBC输血是住院时间(IRR = 1.25,p < 0.0001)和费用(IRR = 1.22,p < 0.0001)的重要驱动因素。
与Hct监测相比,心血管手术期间的tHb监测可显著减少RBC输血、缩短住院时间并降低医院成本。