Edwards Mark J, Michel Llorca Pierre, Driessen Maurice T, Duma Krzysztof, Chaijale Nayla, Sopina Liza, Kotak Sameer, Fagiolini Andrea, Taylor David, Correll Christoph U
Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Medical and Research Activities, Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France.
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 17;68(1):e115. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10047.
While evidence-based clinical practice guidelines promote high-quality care, their absence may create unwarranted variation in disease management, leading to suboptimal outcomes. This study aimed to identify existing clinical practice guidelines for tardive dyskinesia (TD) in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU4+UK), assessing the evidence for recommended TD treatments.
MEDLINE, PubMed, and other sources (e.g., government/public agencies, associations, patient/research organizations) were searched to identify clinical practice guidelines for TD published between January 2000 and February 2025 in EU4+UK. Mentions of TD treatments in identified documents were classified as "recommendations" or "descriptions." Recommendations were ranked according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network grading system or received a "no-rank" label. Subanalyses on tetrabenazine and tiapride, were performed.
Of the 31 documents identified, only two were TD-specific, with the remainder primarily developed for schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Data extraction led to 112 mentions of TD treatments (40 recommendations, 72 descriptions). Most recommendations focused on antipsychotic regimen modification (75%) and had no rank (88%). Only five recommendations (no rank) proposed a pharmaceutical (add-on) treatment: three for tetrabenazine and one each for amantadine and buspirone. Neither of the TD-specific guidelines contained TD treatment recommendations.
No specific clinical practice guidelines for TD in EU4 + UK were found, although TD management was mentioned in guidelines for other disorders. Most recommendations were not supported by high-quality evidence. To improve quality of care for patients with TD in Europe, updated treatment recommendations are needed based on high-quality studies.
虽然循证临床实践指南有助于提供高质量的医疗服务,但缺乏这些指南可能会导致疾病管理出现不必要的差异,从而导致治疗效果欠佳。本研究旨在确定法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国(欧盟4国+英国)针对迟发性运动障碍(TD)的现有临床实践指南,并评估推荐的TD治疗方法的证据。
检索MEDLINE、PubMed和其他来源(如政府/公共机构、协会、患者/研究组织),以确定2000年1月至2025年2月在欧盟4国+英国发布的TD临床实践指南。将已识别文件中提及的TD治疗方法分为“推荐”或“描述”。根据苏格兰跨学院指南网络分级系统对推荐进行排名,或给予“无排名”标签。对丁苯那嗪和硫必利进行了亚组分析。
在识别出的31份文件中,只有两份是针对TD的,其余主要是为精神分裂症、重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍制定的。数据提取共得到112条关于TD治疗方法的提及(40条推荐,72条描述)。大多数推荐集中在抗精神病药物治疗方案的调整(75%),且无排名(88%)。只有五条推荐(无排名)提出了药物(附加)治疗:三条针对丁苯那嗪,一条针对金刚烷胺,一条针对丁螺环酮。两份TD特异性指南均未包含TD治疗推荐。
在欧盟4国+英国未发现针对TD的具体临床实践指南,尽管在其他疾病的指南中提到了TD的管理。大多数推荐缺乏高质量证据的支持。为提高欧洲TD患者的护理质量,需要基于高质量研究更新治疗推荐。