Suppr超能文献

支气管癌。II. 生存质量的定量测量。晚期无法手术患者治疗结果的前瞻性随机研究。

Bronchial carcinoma. II. Quantitative measurements of the quality of survival. A prospective randomized study of the result of therapy in inoperable patients with advanced disease.

作者信息

Nõu E

出版信息

Scand J Respir Dis Suppl. 1979;104:83-106.

PMID:288173
Abstract

Forty-eight bronchial carcinoma patients in clinicoanatomical stage 4 of the disease (advanced disease) were randomly assigned to groups for radiotherapy, chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide) and placebo treatment, respectively. The results were assessed by the survival time and quality of survival. The median survival time was 4.7 months for radiotherapy, 4.7 months for cyclophosphamide and 1.7 months for placebo. The median total sum of vitagram points was 28.1 for radiotherapy, 20.7 for cyclophosphamide and 6.8 for placebo. When calculated per month, the median sum of vitagram points was 5.9 for radiotherapy, 5.7 for cyclophosphamide and 4.8 for placebo. Statistically the results give no reason to believe that placebo is better than radiotherapy, but it cannot be excluded that radiotherapy patients could have a much longer survival. As for cyclophosphamide versus radiotherapy, the differences are to uncertain for any conclusion to be drawn.

摘要

48例处于临床解剖学4期(晚期)的支气管癌患者被随机分为放疗组、化疗(环磷酰胺)组和安慰剂治疗组。通过生存时间和生存质量对结果进行评估。放疗组的中位生存时间为4.7个月,环磷酰胺组为4.7个月,安慰剂组为1.7个月。活力图表积分总和的中位数,放疗组为28.1,环磷酰胺组为20.7,安慰剂组为6.8。按每月计算,活力图表积分的中位数,放疗组为5.9,环磷酰胺组为5.7,安慰剂组为4.8。从统计学角度来看,结果没有理由让人相信安慰剂比放疗效果更好,但不能排除放疗患者的生存期可能长得多的情况。至于环磷酰胺与放疗的比较,差异尚不确定,无法得出任何结论。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验