Research Cluster 'Biodiversity and Medicines'/Research Group 'Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy', UCL School of Pharmacy, University in London, 29-39 Brunswick Sq., London WC1N 1AX, UK.
Vorhaldenstrasse 8, 8049 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2018 Jan 30;211:329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
Ethnopharmacological research aims at gathering information on local and traditional uses of plants and other natural substances. However, the approaches used and the methods employed vary, and while such a variability is desirable in terms of scientific diversity, research must adhere to well defined quality standards and reproducible methods OBJECTIVES: With ConSEFS (the Consensus Statement on Ethnopharmacological Field Studies) we want to define best-practice in developing, conducting and reporting field studies focusing on local and traditional uses of medicinal and food plants, including studies using a historical approach.
After first developing an initial draft the core group invited community-wide feedback from researchers both through a web-based consultation and a series of workshops at conferences during 2017.
The consultation resulted in a large number of responses. Feedback was received via a weblink on the Journal of Ethnopharmacology's website (ca. 100 responses), other oral and written responses (ca. 50) and discussions with stakeholders at four conferences. The main outcome is a checklist, covering best practice for designing, implementing and recording ethnopharmacological field studies and historical studies.
Prior to starting ethnopharmacological field research, it is essential that the authors are fully aware of the best practice in the field. For the first time in the field of ethnopharmacology a community-wide document defines guidelines for best practice on how to conduct and report such studies. It will need to be updated and further developed. While the feedback has been based on responses by many experienced researchers, there is a need to test it in practice by using it both in implementing and reporting field studies (or historical studies), and peer-review.
民族药理学研究旨在收集有关植物和其他天然物质的当地和传统用途的信息。然而,所使用的方法和采用的方法各不相同,虽然这种变异性在科学多样性方面是可取的,但研究必须遵守明确的质量标准和可重复的方法。
我们希望通过 ConSEFS(民族药理学野外研究共识声明)来定义专注于药用和食用植物的当地和传统用途的野外研究的最佳实践,包括使用历史方法的研究。
在最初起草初稿后,核心小组通过网络咨询和 2017 年会议上的一系列研讨会,从研究人员那里广泛征求了社区的反馈意见。
咨询产生了大量的回应。通过 Journal of Ethnopharmacology 网站上的网络链接(约 100 条回复)、其他口头和书面回复(约 50 条)以及在四个会议上与利益相关者的讨论收到了反馈。主要结果是一份检查表,涵盖了设计、实施和记录民族药理学野外研究和历史研究的最佳实践。
在进行民族药理学野外研究之前,作者必须充分了解该领域的最佳实践。在民族药理学领域,第一次有一份社区范围内的文件定义了如何进行和报告此类研究的最佳实践指南。它将需要更新和进一步发展。虽然反馈是基于许多有经验的研究人员的回应,但需要通过在实施和报告野外研究(或历史研究)以及同行评审中使用它来检验其实践效果。