• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts.

作者信息

Cohen Jérémie F, Korevaar Daniël A, Gatsonis Constantine A, Glasziou Paul P, Hooft Lotty, Moher David, Reitsma Johannes B, de Vet Henrica Cw, Bossuyt Patrick M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

INSERM UMR 1153 and Department of Pediatrics, Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMJ. 2017 Aug 17;358:j3751. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3751.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.j3751
PMID:28819063
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts.摘要的STARD：在期刊或会议摘要中报告诊断准确性研究的必备项目。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 17;358:j3751. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3751.
2
Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.生殖医学中检验准确性研究的报告质量：诊断准确性报告标准（STARD）倡议的影响
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.050. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
3
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 清单的可重复性：一种评估诊断准确性研究报告质量的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-12.
4
Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的报告质量。
Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):347-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040507. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
5
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?自《STARD声明》发布以来诊断准确性研究的质量：有提高吗？
Neurology. 2006 Sep 12;67(5):792-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238386.41398.30.
6
Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria.心脏 MRI、CT 和 SPECT 诊断准确性研究的报告标准：STARD 标准的影响分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;15(6):691-700. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet277. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
7
An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: the Liver-FibroSTARD standards.STARD 声明扩展版：用于报告肝纤维化检测诊断准确性研究的标准——肝纤维化 STARD 标准。
J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(4):807-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.10.042. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
8
Quality of reporting of orthopaedic diagnostic accuracy studies is suboptimal.骨科诊断准确性研究的报告质量欠佳。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:237-46. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000205906.44103.a3.
9
Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD.报告诊断准确性研究：STARD 实施 10 年后的一些改进。
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):781-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141160. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
10
STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.STARD-BLCM：使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型的诊断准确性研究报告标准。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Mar 1;138:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence.使用人工智能的诊断准确性研究的STARD-AI报告指南。
Nat Med. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03953-8.
2
Adherence to STARD guidelines in miRNA diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.肝细胞癌微小RNA诊断准确性研究中对STARD指南的遵循情况：一项系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02610-5.
3
Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy study.
X线片阴性的肩部损伤急性期体格检查试验：一项诊断准确性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jun 3;26(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08754-1.
4
Radiographic classification of mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A blinded prospective multi-disciplinary interobserver diagnostic performance study.下颌骨放射性骨坏死的影像学分类：一项盲法前瞻性多学科观察者间诊断性能研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jul;208:110917. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110917. Epub 2025 May 2.
5
Radiographic classification of mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A blinded prospective multi-disciplinary interobserver diagnostic performance study.下颌骨放射性骨坏死的影像学分类：一项盲法前瞻性多学科观察者间诊断性能研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 14:2025.02.11.25322082. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.11.25322082.
6
Identification of major trauma using the simplified abbreviated injury scale to estimate the injury severity score: a diagnostic accuracy and validation study.使用简化简明损伤量表识别重大创伤以评估损伤严重程度评分：一项诊断准确性和验证性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 29;33(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01320-7.
7
Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of an RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.评估用于检测唾液中SARS-CoV-2的逆转录聚合酶链反应（RT-PCR）检测的诊断准确性。
Diagn Progn Res. 2024 Jul 24;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00176-2.
8
Development of the Reporting Infographics and Visual Abstracts of Comparative studies (RIVA-C) checklist and guide.比较研究报告信息图表和可视化摘要（RIVA-C）清单及指南的制定。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(5):342-345. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112784.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of the 5.07 monofilament test for diabetes polyneuropathy: influence of age, sex, neuropathic pain and neuropathy severity.5.07 单丝试验诊断糖尿病周围神经病的准确性：年龄、性别、神经病理性疼痛和神经病变严重程度的影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Nov;11(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003545.
10
Development of a diagnostic support tool for predicting cervical arterial dissection in primary care.开发一种用于预测初级保健中颈动脉夹层的诊断支持工具。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Apr;32(2):173-181. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2250164. Epub 2023 Aug 31.