Meling Torstein R
Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Oct;40(4):587-593. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0893-1. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
Treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) of the supraclinoidal internal carotid artery (ICA) is challenging and the optimal treatment is yet to be defined. The treatment options for ICA BBAS are microsurgery, endovascular therapy, or a combination of the two. The microsurgical armamentarium consists mainly of direct aneurysm clipping with or without protective EC-IC bypass, clip-wrapping, or trap ligation with ICA sacrifice with or without EC-IC bypass. The endovascular treatment options are mainly endovascular ICA ligation, multiple overlapping stents (≥ 3) with or without coiling, covered stents, or flow diverters. In four recent meta-analyses of BBAs, neither microsurgical nor endovascular therapy had an impact on clinical outcome in multivariate analysis. Microsurgery offered aneurysm obliteration rates superior to endovascular techniques, but came at a higher risk of intraoperative bleeding. Endovascular therapy increased the likelihood of a second treatment, conversion to another treatment modality, and incomplete aneurysm obliteration. In this review, we discuss pros and cons of the above approaches while adding our own viewpoints to the discussion.
鞍上颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤(BBAs)的治疗具有挑战性,最佳治疗方案尚未确定。颈内动脉BBAs的治疗选择包括显微手术、血管内治疗或两者结合。显微手术器械主要包括直接动脉瘤夹闭术,可伴有或不伴有保护性的颅外-颅内(EC-IC)旁路手术、夹闭包裹术,或伴有或不伴有EC-IC旁路手术的颈内动脉牺牲性圈套结扎术。血管内治疗选择主要包括血管内颈内动脉结扎术、多个重叠支架(≥3个)并可伴有或不伴有弹簧圈栓塞、覆膜支架或血流导向装置。在最近四项关于BBAs的荟萃分析中,在多变量分析中,显微手术和血管内治疗对临床结局均无影响。显微手术的动脉瘤闭塞率高于血管内技术,但术中出血风险更高。血管内治疗增加了二次治疗、转为另一种治疗方式以及动脉瘤闭塞不完全的可能性。在本综述中,我们讨论上述方法的优缺点,并在讨论中加入我们自己的观点。