Meyer Carola W, Ootsuka Youichirou, Romanovsky Andrej A
Department of Pharmacology, Max-Planck Institute for Heart and Lung ResearchBad Nauheim, Germany.
Centre for Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Flinders University of South AustraliaAdelaide, SA, Australia.
Front Physiol. 2017 Jul 31;8:520. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00520. eCollection 2017.
Rectal probing is subject to procedural bias. This method is suitable for first-line phenotyping, provided probe depth and measurement duration are standardized. It is also useful for detecting individuals with out-of-range body temperatures (during hypothermia, torpor).The colonic temperature attained by inserting the probe >2 cm deep is a measure of deep (core) body temperature.IR imaging of the skin is useful for detecting heat leaks and autonomous thermoregulatory alterations, but it does not measure body temperature.Temperature of the hairy or shaved skin covering the inter-scapular brown adipose tissue can be used as a measure of BAT thermogenesis. However, obtaining such measurements of sufficient quality is very difficult, and interpreting them can be tricky. Temperature differences between the inter-scapular and lumbar areas can be a better measure of the thermogenic activity of inter-scapular brown adipose tissue.Implanted probes for precise determination of BAT temperature (changes) should be fixed close to the Sulzer's vein. For measurement of BAT thermogenesis, core body temperature and BAT temperature should be recorded simultaneously.Tail temperature is suitable to compare the presence or absence of vasoconstriction or vasodilation.Continuous, longitudinal monitoring of core body temperature is preferred over single probing, as the readings are taken in a non-invasive, physiological context.Combining core body temperature measurements with metabolic rate measurements yields insights into the interplay between heat production and heat loss (thermal conductance), potentially revealing novel thermoregulatory phenotypes. Endothermic organisms rely on tightly balanced energy budgets to maintain a regulated body temperature and body mass. Metabolic phenotyping of mice, therefore, often includes the recording of body temperature. Thermometry in mice is conducted at various sites, using various devices and measurement practices, ranging from single-time probing to continuous temperature imaging. Whilst there is broad agreement that body temperature data is of value, procedural considerations of body temperature measurements in the context of metabolic phenotyping are missing. Here, we provide an overview of the various methods currently available for gathering body temperature data from mice. We explore the scope and limitations of thermometry in mice, with the hope of assisting researchers in the selection of appropriate approaches, and conditions, for comprehensive mouse phenotypic analyses.
直肠探测存在程序偏差。该方法适用于一线表型分析,前提是探头深度和测量持续时间标准化。它也有助于检测体温超出范围的个体(在体温过低、蛰伏期间)。将探头插入超过2厘米深所获得的结肠温度是深部(核心)体温的一种度量。皮肤的红外成像有助于检测热量散失和自主体温调节改变,但它不测量体温。覆盖肩胛间棕色脂肪组织的有毛或剃毛皮肤的温度可用于衡量棕色脂肪组织的产热情况。然而,获得足够质量的此类测量非常困难,且对其进行解读可能很棘手。肩胛间和腰部区域之间的温度差异可能是衡量肩胛间棕色脂肪组织产热活性的更好指标。用于精确测定棕色脂肪组织温度(变化)的植入式探头应固定在靠近苏尔泽静脉的位置。为了测量棕色脂肪组织的产热,应同时记录核心体温和棕色脂肪组织温度。尾部温度适合用于比较血管收缩或血管舒张的有无。与单次探测相比,连续、纵向监测核心体温更可取,因为读数是在非侵入性的生理环境中获取的。将核心体温测量与代谢率测量相结合,有助于深入了解产热与散热(热传导)之间的相互作用,可能揭示新的体温调节表型。恒温动物依靠严格平衡的能量预算来维持调节后的体温和体重。因此,小鼠的代谢表型分析通常包括体温记录。小鼠体温测量在不同部位进行,使用各种设备和测量方法,从单次探测到连续温度成像。虽然人们普遍认为体温数据有价值,但在代谢表型分析背景下,体温测量的程序考虑却有所缺失。在此,我们概述了目前可用于从小鼠获取体温数据的各种方法。我们探讨了小鼠体温测量的范围和局限性,希望能帮助研究人员选择合适的方法和条件进行全面的小鼠表型分析。