Kuan Chee-Hao, Rukayadi Yaya, Ahmad Siti H, Wan Mohamed Radzi Che W J, Thung Tze-Young, Premarathne Jayasekara M K J K, Chang Wei-San, Loo Yuet-Ying, Tan Chia-Wanq, Ramzi Othman B, Mohd Fadzil Siti N, Kuan Chee-Sian, Yeo Siok-Koon, Nishibuchi Mitsuaki, Radu Son
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra MalaysiaSerdang, Malaysia.
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra MalaysiaSerdang, Malaysia.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jul 31;8:1433. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01433. eCollection 2017.
Given the remarkable increase of public interest in organic food products, it is indeed critical to evaluate the microbiological risk associated with consumption of fresh organic produce. Organic farming practices including the use of animal manures may increase the risk of microbiological contamination as manure can act as a vehicle for transmission of foodborne pathogens. This study aimed to determine and compare the microbiological status between organic and conventional fresh produce at the retail level in Malaysia. A total of 152 organic and conventional vegetables were purchased at retail markets in Malaysia. Samples were analyzed for mesophilic aerobic bacteria, yeasts and molds, and total coliforms using conventional microbiological methods. Combination methods of most probable number-multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPN-mPCR) were used to detect and quantify foodborne pathogens, including O157:H7, Shiga toxin-producing (STEC), Typhimurium, and Enteritidis. Results indicated that most types of organic and conventional vegetables possessed similar microbial count ( > 0.05) of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, yeasts and molds, and total coliforms. O157:H7 and . Typhimurium were not detected in any sample analyzed in this study. Among the 152 samples tested, only the conventional lettuce and organic carrot were tested positive for STEC and . Enteritidis, respectively. were more frequently detected in both organic (9.1%) and conventional vegetables (2.7%) as compared to O157:H7, . Typhimurium, and . Enteritidis. Overall, no trend was shown that either organically or conventionally grown vegetables have posed greater microbiological risks. These findings indicated that one particular type of farming practices would not affect the microbiological profiles of fresh produce. Therefore, regardless of farming methods, all vegetables should be subjected to appropriate post-harvest handling practices from farm to fork to ensure the quality and safety of the fresh produce.
鉴于公众对有机食品的兴趣显著增加,评估食用新鲜有机农产品相关的微生物风险确实至关重要。包括使用动物粪便在内的有机耕作方式可能会增加微生物污染风险,因为粪便可作为食源性病原体传播的载体。本研究旨在确定并比较马来西亚零售层面有机和传统新鲜农产品的微生物状况。在马来西亚零售市场共购买了152种有机和传统蔬菜。使用传统微生物学方法对样品进行嗜温需氧菌、酵母菌和霉菌以及总大肠菌群分析。采用最可能数 - 多重聚合酶链反应(MPN - mPCR)组合方法检测和定量食源性病原体,包括O157:H7、产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)、鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和肠炎沙门氏菌。结果表明,大多数有机和传统蔬菜的嗜温需氧菌、酵母菌和霉菌以及总大肠菌群的微生物计数相似(>0.05)。本研究分析的任何样品中均未检测到O157:H7和鼠伤寒沙门氏菌。在测试的152个样品中,仅传统生菜和有机胡萝卜分别检测出STEC和肠炎沙门氏菌呈阳性。与O157:H7、鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和肠炎沙门氏菌相比,STEC在有机蔬菜(9.1%)和传统蔬菜(2.7%)中更频繁地被检测到。总体而言,未显示出有机种植或传统种植的蔬菜存在更大微生物风险的趋势。这些发现表明,一种特定的耕作方式不会影响新鲜农产品的微生物特征。因此,无论耕作方法如何,所有蔬菜都应在从农场到餐桌的过程中接受适当的收获后处理措施,以确保新鲜农产品的质量和安全。