• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认识重要之事:价值通过选择性增强回忆来提高识别能力。

Recognizing What Matters: Value Improves Recognition by Selectively Enhancing Recollection.

作者信息

Hennessee Joseph P, Castel Alan D, Knowlton Barbara J

机构信息

University of California Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, 90095, USA.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.004
PMID:28827894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5562370/
Abstract

We examined the effects of value on recognition by assessing its contribution to recollection and familiarity. In three experiments, participants studied English words, each associated with a point-value they would earn for correct recognition, with the goal of maximizing their score. In Experiment 1, participants provided Remember/Know judgments. In Experiment 2 participants indicated whether items were recollected or if not, their degree of familiarity along a 6-point scale. In Experiment 3, recognition of words was accompanied by a test of memory for incidental details. Across all experiments, participants were more likely to recognize items with higher point-value. Furthermore, value appeared to primarily enhance recollection, as effects on familiarity were small and not consistent across experiments. Recollection of high-value items appears to be accompanied by fewer incidental details, suggesting that value increases focus on items at the expense of irrelevant information.

摘要

我们通过评估价值对回忆和熟悉度的贡献,研究了价值对识别的影响。在三个实验中,参与者学习英语单词,每个单词都与他们正确识别后将获得的分值相关联,目标是使他们的分数最大化。在实验1中,参与者提供“记得/知道”判断。在实验2中,参与者指出项目是否被回忆起来,如果没有,则沿着6分制表明他们的熟悉程度。在实验3中,对单词的识别伴随着对附带细节的记忆测试。在所有实验中,参与者更有可能识别分值较高的项目。此外,价值似乎主要增强了回忆,因为对熟悉度的影响较小且在各实验中不一致。对高价值项目的回忆似乎伴随着较少的附带细节,这表明价值增加了对项目的关注,以牺牲无关信息为代价。

相似文献

1
Recognizing What Matters: Value Improves Recognition by Selectively Enhancing Recollection.认识重要之事:价值通过选择性增强回忆来提高识别能力。
J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.自由回忆测试体验增强了价值对记忆的策略驱动效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1581-1601. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000395. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.新颖性对识别记忆中回忆和熟悉性的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1045-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03196125.
4
The effects of value on context-item associative memory in younger and older adults.价值对年轻和老年成年人语境项目联想记忆的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Feb;33(1):46-56. doi: 10.1037/pag0000202.
5
On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.关于再认判断的有效性:来自出声思维报告的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1625-33. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
6
[Effects of recollection and familiarity on recognition memory in the Concealed Information Test].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2013 Aug;84(3):209-17. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.84.209.
7
Selective lesion to the entorhinal cortex leads to an impairment in familiarity but not recollection.内嗅皮层的选择性损伤会导致熟悉感受损,但不会影响回忆。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Apr;104:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
8
Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information.根据熟悉度、回忆及回忆信息量对识别记忆的神经关联进行解离。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.027. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
9
Dissociating familiarity from recollection using rote rehearsal.使用机械复述将熟悉感与回忆区分开来。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Sep;32(6):932-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03196871.
10
Exploring the recognition memory deficit in Parkinson's disease: estimates of recollection versus familiarity.探索帕金森病中的识别记忆缺陷:回忆与熟悉度的评估
Brain. 2006 Jul;129(Pt 7):1768-79. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl115. Epub 2006 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.价值导向记忆:一种双过程视角
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 17;15(8):1113. doi: 10.3390/bs15081113.
2
Prediction of information value influences memory: the effect of predicted and assigned value on memory.信息价值的预测会影响记忆:预测价值和赋予价值对记忆的影响。
Memory. 2025 May;33(5):588-603. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2025.2502488. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
The importance of truth: Joint retrieval of "true" and "important" feedback in multidimensional source memory.真相的重要性:多维度源记忆中“真实”与“重要”反馈的联合检索
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02702-9.
4
Less Than Zero?小于零?
Exp Psychol. 2025 Jan;72(1):27-41. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000641. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
5
The effect of value on context and target recollection in memory for truth and falsity.价值对真假记忆中语境和目标回忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1451-1462. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01554-3. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
The limited memory of value following value directed encoding.价值导向编码后的价值记忆有限。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1387-1407. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01550-7. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Goal-directed remembering in older adults.老年人的目标导向记忆。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Sep;31(5):891-913. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2023.2282223. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
PEPPR: A post-encoding pre-production reinstatement model of dual-list free recall.PEPPR:一种双列表自由回忆的后编码前生产恢复模型。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):163-181. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01453-z. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
9
Value-directed memory selectivity relies on goal-directed knowledge of value structure prior to encoding in young and older adults.价值导向的记忆选择性依赖于年轻和老年成年人在编码之前对价值结构的目标导向知识。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Feb;38(1):30-48. doi: 10.1037/pag0000720.
10
Midbrain-Hippocampus Structural Connectivity Selectively Predicts Motivated Memory Encoding.中脑-海马结构连接选择性预测动机记忆编码。
J Neurosci. 2022 Dec 14;42(50):9426-9434. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0945-22.2022. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The representational consequences of intentional forgetting: Impairments to both the probability and fidelity of long-term memory.有意遗忘的表征后果:对长期记忆的概率和保真度的损害。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jan;145(1):56-81. doi: 10.1037/xge0000128.
2
Decoding Episodic Retrieval Processes: Frontoparietal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions to Free Recall.解码情景记忆检索过程:额顶叶和内侧颞叶对自由回忆的贡献。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;28(1):125-39. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00881. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
3
Relationship between impulsivity, prefrontal anticipatory activation, and striatal dopamine release during rewarded task performance.奖励任务执行过程中冲动性、前额叶预期激活与纹状体多巴胺释放之间的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Sep 30;223(3):244-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
4
Maintenance rehearsal affects knowing, not remembering; elaborative rehearsal affects remembering, not knowing.维持性排练影响的是理解,而不是记忆;详尽性排练影响的是记忆,而不是理解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):107-10. doi: 10.3758/BF03200764.
5
Reward-enhanced memory in younger and older adults.奖励增强年轻人和老年人的记忆。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Sep;69(5):730-40. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt044. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.一种基于价值驱动的注意选择机制。
J Vis. 2013 Apr 15;13(3):7. doi: 10.1167/13.3.7.
7
Consolidation power of extrinsic rewards: reward cues enhance long-term memory for irrelevant past events.外在奖励的巩固力量:奖励线索增强了对无关过去事件的长期记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):15-20. doi: 10.1037/a0031992. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
8
Selecting valuable information to remember: age-related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning.选择有价值的信息进行记忆:自我调节学习中的年龄相关差异和相似性。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):232-42. doi: 10.1037/a0030678. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
9
Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture.学习价值放大基于突显的注意力捕获。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027926. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.关于再认判断的有效性:来自出声思维报告的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1625-33. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Oct 1.