Family Medicine Department, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Nicolae Testemitanu", Bd. Stefan cel Mare 165, MD-2004, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Institute of General Practice, Heinrich-Heine-University, Werdener Str. 4, D-40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Aug 22;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0653-x.
Substantial variations are still to be found in the strength of general practice/family medicine (GP/FM) across Europe regarding governance, workforce competence and performance, as well as academic development and position. Governments are encouraged by the WHO to secure high quality primary health care to their population, a necessity for reaching the goal "Health for all". The present study aimed at investigating the opinions of council members of the European Academy of Teachers in General Practice (EURACT) on necessary actions to strengthen the position of GP/FM in their country.
The study used a mixed methods exploratory sequential design. EURACT representatives from 32 European countries first participated in brain-storming on how to strengthen GP/FM in Europe. Later, representatives from 37 countries were asked to individually score the relevance of the proposed actions for their country on a 9-point Likert scale. They were also asked to evaluate the status of GP/FM in their country on four dimensions.
Respondents from 30 European countries returned complete questionnaires. To build and secure GP/FM as an academic discipline comprising teaching and research was seen as essential, regardless the present status of GP/FM in the respective country. To build GP/FM as a specialty on the same level as other specialties was seen as important in countries where GP/FM held a strong or medium strong position. The importance of common learning objectives and a defined bibliography were stated by respondents from countries where GP/FM presently has a weak position.
In order to strengthen GP/FM throughout Europe, EURACT and other professional organizations must establish common goals and share expertise between countries. To influence decision makers through information on cost-effectiveness of a GP/FM-based health care system is also important.
在治理、劳动力能力和绩效以及学术发展和地位方面,欧洲各国的全科医学/家庭医学(GP/FM)实力仍存在很大差异。世卫组织鼓励各国政府为其民众提供高质量的初级卫生保健,这是实现“人人享有健康”目标的必要条件。本研究旨在调查欧洲全科医学教师学会(EURACT)理事会成员对加强其国家 GP/FM 地位的必要措施的看法。
该研究采用混合方法探索性序贯设计。来自 32 个欧洲国家的 EURACT 代表首先参与了关于如何在欧洲加强 GP/FM 的头脑风暴。之后,来自 37 个国家的代表被要求在 9 点 Likert 量表上对为其国家提出的行动的相关性进行单独评分。他们还被要求评估其国家的 GP/FM 状况在四个维度上的情况。
来自 30 个欧洲国家的受访者返回了完整的问卷。无论各自国家的 GP/FM 现状如何,将 GP/FM 建立和确认为一个包含教学和研究的学术学科被视为至关重要。将 GP/FM 建立为与其他专业同等水平的专业学科,在 GP/FM 地位较强或中等较强的国家被视为重要。那些 GP/FM 目前处于弱势地位的国家的受访者表示,设定共同的学习目标和定义参考书目很重要。
为了在整个欧洲加强 GP/FM,EURACT 和其他专业组织必须建立共同的目标,并在国家之间共享专业知识。通过提供基于 GP/FM 的卫生保健系统的成本效益信息来影响决策者也很重要。