Silveira Rodrigo, Andrade-Souza Victor Amorim, Arcoverde Lucyana, Tomazini Fabiano, Sansonio André, Bishop David John, Bertuzzi Romulo, Lima-Silva Adriano Eduardo
1Sport Science Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Academic Center of Vitoria, Federal University of Pernambuco, Vitoria de Santo Antao, Pernambuco, BRAZIL; 2Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, College of Sport and Exercise Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA; 3School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA; 4Endurance Performance Research Group (GEDAE-USP), School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, BRAZIL; and 5Human Performance Research Group, Academic Department of Physical Education, Technological Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, BRAZIL.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jan;50(1):131-140. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001408.
The assumption that the curvature constant (W') of the power-duration relationship represents anaerobic work capacity is a controversial, unresolved question. We investigated if caffeine ingestion could increase total work done above critical power (CP), and if this would be accompanied by greater anaerobic energy expenditure and by an enhanced maintenance of maximal oxidative metabolic rate.
Nine men (26.6 ± 5.3 yr, V˙O2max 40.6 ± 5.8 mL·kg·min) cycled until exhaustion at different exercise intensities on different days to determine the CP and W'. On separated days, participants cycled until exhaustion in the severe-intensity domain (136% ± 7% of CP) after ingesting either caffeine (5 mg·kg body mass) or a placebo.
Time to exhaustion was 34% longer with caffeine compared with placebo, and this was accompanied by a greater work done above CP (23.7 ± 5.7 vs 17.5 ± 3.6 kJ; 130% ± 30% vs 95% ± 14% of W', P < 0.01). Caffeine increased the aerobic energy expenditure (296.4 ± 91.0 vs 210.2 ± 71.9 kJ, P < 0.01), but not anaerobic lactic, anaerobic alactic, and total anaerobic (lactic + alactic) energy expenditure. The end values of heart rate and ventilation were higher with caffeine, but the V˙O2 end was similar between conditions and was not different from V˙O2max. Caffeine did not change time to reach V˙O2max but increased time maintained at V˙O2max (199.3 ± 105.9 vs 111.9 ± 87.1 s, P < 0.05).
Caffeine increased total work done above CP, but this was not associated with greater anaerobic work. Rather, this was associated with a higher tolerance to maintain exercise at maximal oxidative metabolic rate.
功率-持续时间关系的曲率常数(W')代表无氧工作能力这一假设是一个有争议且未解决的问题。我们研究了摄入咖啡因是否能增加高于临界功率(CP)时完成的总功,以及这是否会伴随着更大的无氧能量消耗和最大氧化代谢率维持能力的增强。
9名男性(26.6±5.3岁,最大摄氧量40.6±5.8 mL·kg·min)在不同日期以不同运动强度骑行至力竭,以确定CP和W'。在不同日期,参与者在摄入咖啡因(5 mg·kg体重)或安慰剂后,在高强度运动区域(CP的136%±7%)骑行至力竭。
与安慰剂相比,摄入咖啡因后力竭时间延长了34%,同时高于CP时完成的功更大(23.7±5.7 vs 17.5±3.6 kJ;W'的130%±30% vs 95%±14%,P<0.01)。咖啡因增加了有氧能量消耗(296.4±91.0 vs 210.2±71.9 kJ,P<0.01),但无氧乳酸、无氧非乳酸和总无氧(乳酸+非乳酸)能量消耗没有增加。咖啡因组心率和通气的终末值更高,但两种情况下的最大摄氧量终末值相似,且与最大摄氧量无差异。咖啡因没有改变达到最大摄氧量的时间,但增加了维持在最大摄氧量的时间(199.3±105.9 vs 111.9±87.1 s,P<0.05)。
咖啡因增加了高于CP时完成的总功,但这与更大的无氧功无关。相反,这与在最大氧化代谢率下维持运动的更高耐受性有关。