Hesen Nienke A, Riksen Niels P, Aalders Bart, Brouwer Michelle AE, Ritskes-Hoitinga Merel, El Messaoudi Saloua, Wever Kimberley E
SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183664. eCollection 2017.
Metformin improves cardiovascular prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus, compared to alternative glucose-lowering drugs, despite similar glycemic control. Direct cardiovascular protective properties have therefore been proposed, and studied in preclinical models of myocardial infarction. We now aim to critically assess the quality and outcome of these studies. We present a systematic review, quality assessment and meta-analysis of the effect of metformin in animal studies of experimental myocardial infarction. Through a comprehensive search in Pubmed and EMBASE, we identified 27 studies, 11 reporting on ex vivo experiments and 18 reporting on in vivo experiments. The primary endpoint infarct size as percentage of area at risk was significantly reduced by metformin in vivo (MD -18.11[-24.09,-12.14]) and ex vivo (MD -18.70[-25.39, -12.02]). Metformin improved the secondary endpoints left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end systolic diameter. A borderline significant effect on mortality was observed, and there was no overall effect on cardiac hypertrophy. Subgroup analyses could be performed for comorbidity and timing of treatment (infarct size and mortality) and species and duration of ischemia (LVEF), but none of these variables accounted for significant amounts of heterogeneity. Reporting of possible sources of bias was extremely poor, including randomization (reported in 63%), blinding (33%), and sample size calculation (0%). As a result, risk of bias (assessed using SYRCLE's risk of bias tool) was unclear in the vast majority of studies. We conclude that metformin limits infarct-size and improves cardiac function in animal models of myocardial infarction, but our confidence in the evidence is lowered by the unclear risk of bias and residual unexplained heterogeneity. We recommend an adequately powered, high quality confirmatory animal study to precede a randomized controlled trial of acute administration of metformin in patients undergoing reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction.
与其他降糖药物相比,二甲双胍可改善糖尿病患者的心血管预后,尽管血糖控制情况相似。因此,有人提出二甲双胍具有直接的心血管保护作用,并在心肌梗死的临床前模型中进行了研究。我们现在旨在严格评估这些研究的质量和结果。我们对二甲双胍在实验性心肌梗死动物研究中的作用进行了系统评价、质量评估和荟萃分析。通过在PubMed和EMBASE上进行全面检索,我们确定了27项研究,其中11项报告了体外实验,18项报告了体内实验。二甲双胍可使体内(MD -18.11[-24.09,-12.14])和体外(MD -18.70[-25.39, -12.02])的主要终点梗死面积占危险区域面积的百分比显著降低。二甲双胍改善了次要终点左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心室收缩末期内径。观察到对死亡率有临界显著影响,对心脏肥大无总体影响。可以对合并症和治疗时机(梗死面积和死亡率)以及物种和缺血持续时间(LVEF)进行亚组分析,但这些变量均未导致大量异质性。对可能的偏倚来源的报告非常差,包括随机化(63%报告)、盲法(33%)和样本量计算(0%)。因此,在绝大多数研究中,偏倚风险(使用SYRCLE偏倚风险工具评估)尚不清楚。我们得出结论,二甲双胍可限制心肌梗死动物模型中的梗死面积并改善心脏功能,但偏倚风险不明确和残留无法解释的异质性降低了我们对证据的信心。我们建议在对急性心肌梗死再灌注患者进行二甲双胍急性给药的随机对照试验之前,先进行一项有足够效力的高质量验证性动物研究。