Nobre Aline Araújo, Carvalho Marilia Sá, Griep Rosane Härter, Fonseca Maria de Jesus Mendes da, Melo Enirtes Caetano Prates, Santos Itamar de Souza, Chor Dora
Programa de Computação Científica. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Aug 17;51:76. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006882.
To compare two methodological approaches: the multinomial model and the zero-inflated gamma model, evaluating the factors associated with the practice and amount of time spent on leisure time physical activity.
Data collected from 14,823 baseline participants in the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil - Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto ) have been analysed. Regular leisure time physical activity has been measured using the leisure time physical activity module of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. The explanatory variables considered were gender, age, education level, and annual per capita family income.
The main advantage of the zero-inflated gamma model over the multinomial model is that it estimates mean time (minutes per week) spent on leisure time physical activity. For example, on average, men spent 28 minutes/week longer on leisure time physical activity than women did. The most sedentary groups were young women with low education level and income.
The zero-inflated gamma model, which is rarely used in epidemiological studies, can give more appropriate answers in several situations. In our case, we have obtained important information on the main determinants of the duration of leisure time physical activity. This information can help guide efforts towards the most vulnerable groups since physical inactivity is associated with different diseases and even premature death.
比较两种方法:多项模型和零膨胀伽马模型,评估与休闲时间身体活动的实践及花费时间相关的因素。
对从成人健康纵向研究(ELSA - Brasil - 成人健康纵向研究)的14823名基线参与者收集的数据进行了分析。使用国际体力活动问卷的休闲时间身体活动模块来测量定期休闲时间身体活动。所考虑的解释变量为性别、年龄、教育水平和家庭人均年收入。
零膨胀伽马模型相对于多项模型的主要优势在于它能估计在休闲时间身体活动上花费的平均时间(每周分钟数)。例如,平均而言,男性在休闲时间身体活动上比女性每周多花费28分钟。久坐不动最多的群体是教育水平和收入较低的年轻女性。
零膨胀伽马模型在流行病学研究中很少使用,但在几种情况下能给出更合适的答案。在我们的案例中,我们获得了关于休闲时间身体活动时长主要决定因素的重要信息。由于身体不活动与不同疾病甚至过早死亡相关,这些信息有助于指导针对最脆弱群体的工作。