Peltonen L-M, Peltonen V, Salanterä S, Tommila M
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Intensive Care Unit, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Oct;61(9):1215-1231. doi: 10.1111/aas.12960. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Assessing advanced life support (ALS) competence requires validated instruments. Existing instruments include aspects of technical skills (TS), non-technical skills (NTS) or both, but one instrument for detailed assessment that suits all resuscitation situations is lacking. This study aimed to develop an instrument for the evaluation of the overall ALS performance of the whole team.
This instrument development study had four phases. First, we reviewed literature and resuscitation guidelines to explore items to include in the instrument. Thereafter, we interviewed resuscitation team professionals (n = 66), using the critical incident technique, to determine possible additional aspects associated with the performance of ALS. Second, we developed an instrument based on the findings. Third, we used an expert panel (n = 20) to assess the validity of the developed instrument. Finally, we revised the instrument based on the experts' comments and tested it with six experts who evaluated 22 video recorded resuscitations.
The final version of the developed instrument had 69 items divided into adherence to guidelines (28 items), clinical decision-making (5 items), workload management (12 items), team behaviour (8 items), information management (6 items), patient integrity and consideration of laymen (4 items) and work routines (6 items). The Cronbach's α values were good, and strong correlations between the overall performance and the instrument were observed.
The instrument may be useful for detailed assessment of the team's overall performance, but the numerous items make the use demanding. The instrument is still under development, and more research is needed to determine its psychometric properties.
评估高级生命支持(ALS)能力需要经过验证的工具。现有工具包括技术技能(TS)、非技术技能(NTS)或两者兼具的方面,但缺乏一种适用于所有复苏情况的详细评估工具。本研究旨在开发一种评估整个团队总体ALS表现的工具。
本工具开发研究分为四个阶段。首先,我们回顾了文献和复苏指南,以探索工具中应包含的项目。此后,我们采用关键事件技术对复苏团队专业人员(n = 66)进行访谈,以确定与ALS表现相关的可能的其他方面。其次,我们根据研究结果开发了一种工具。第三,我们使用一个专家小组(n = 20)来评估所开发工具的有效性。最后,我们根据专家的意见对工具进行修订,并与六位评估了22次录像复苏的专家一起对其进行测试。
所开发工具的最终版本有69个项目,分为遵循指南(28项)、临床决策(5项)、工作量管理(12项)、团队行为(8项)、信息管理(6项)、患者完整性和对外行的考虑(4项)以及工作流程(6项)。克朗巴哈α值良好,且观察到总体表现与该工具之间有很强的相关性。
该工具可能有助于详细评估团队的总体表现,但众多项目使其使用要求较高。该工具仍在开发中,需要更多研究来确定其心理测量特性。