• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析风险因素对疾病发病率与诊断后生存率影响的方法学考量:以女性健康倡议中的肥胖与乳腺癌及结直肠癌死亡率为例

Methodological considerations for disentangling a risk factor's influence on disease incidence versus postdiagnosis survival: The example of obesity and breast and colorectal cancer mortality in the Women's Health Initiative.

作者信息

Cespedes Feliciano Elizabeth M, Prentice Ross L, Aragaki Aaron K, Neuhouser Marian L, Banack Hailey R, Kroenke Candyce H, Ho Gloria Y F, Zaslavsky Oleg, Strickler Howard D, Cheng Ting-Yuan David, Chlebowski Rowan T, Saquib Nazmus, Nassir Rami, Anderson Garnet, Caan Bette J

机构信息

Division of Research, Oakland, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, CA.

Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;141(11):2281-2290. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30931. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.30931
PMID:28833074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5761345/
Abstract

Often, studies modeling an exposure's influence on time to disease-specific death from study enrollment are incorrectly interpreted as if based on time to death from disease diagnosis. We studied 151,996 postmenopausal women without breast or colorectal cancer in the Women's Health Initiative with weight and height measured at enrollment (1993-1998). Using Cox regression models, we contrast hazard ratios (HR) from two time-scales and corresponding study subpopulations: time to cancer death after enrollment among all women and time to cancer death after diagnosis among only cancer survivors. Median follow-up from enrollment to diagnosis/censoring was 13 years for both breast (7,633 cases) and colorectal cancer (2,290 cases). Median follow-up from diagnosis to death/censoring was 7 years for breast and 5 years for colorectal cancer. In analyses of time from enrollment to death, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m versus 18.5-<25 kg/m was associated with higher rates of cancer mortality: HR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.54, 2.56 for breast cancer (p trend <0.001) and HR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.88 for colorectal cancer (p trend = 0.05). However, in analyses of time from diagnosis to cancer death, trends indicated no significant association (for BMI ≥ 35 kg/m , HR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.67 for breast [p trend = 0.33] and HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.86 for colorectal cancer [p trend = 0.39]). We conclude that a risk factor that increases disease incidence will increase disease-specific mortality. Yet, its influence on postdiagnosis survival can vary, and requires consideration of additional design and analysis issues such as selection bias. Quantitative tools allow joint modeling to compare an exposure's influence on time from enrollment to disease incidence and time from diagnosis to death.

摘要

通常,那些模拟从研究入组开始暴露因素对特定疾病死亡时间影响的研究,常被错误地解读为基于疾病诊断后的死亡时间。我们对女性健康倡议(Women's Health Initiative)中151,996名无乳腺癌或结直肠癌的绝经后女性进行了研究,这些女性在入组时(1993 - 1998年)测量了体重和身高。使用Cox回归模型,我们对比了两个时间尺度以及相应研究亚组的风险比(HR):所有女性入组后至癌症死亡的时间,以及仅癌症幸存者诊断后至癌症死亡的时间。从入组到诊断/截尾的中位随访时间,乳腺癌(7,633例)和结直肠癌(2,290例)均为13年。从诊断到死亡/截尾的中位随访时间,乳腺癌为7年,结直肠癌为5年。在从入组到死亡时间的分析中,体重指数(BMI)≥35 kg/m²与18.5 - <25 kg/m²相比,癌症死亡率更高:乳腺癌的HR = 1.99;95% CI:1.54, 2.56(p趋势<0.001),结直肠癌的HR = 1.40;95% CI:1.04, 1.88(p趋势 = 0.05)。然而,在从诊断到癌症死亡时间的分析中,趋势表明无显著关联(对于BMI≥35 kg/m²,乳腺癌的HR = 1.25;95% CI:0.94, 1.67(p趋势 = 0.33),结直肠癌的HR = 1.18;95% CI:0.84, 1.86(p趋势 = 0.39))。我们得出结论,增加疾病发病率的风险因素会增加特定疾病的死亡率。然而,其对诊断后生存的影响可能不同,需要考虑额外的设计和分析问题,如选择偏倚。定量工具允许联合建模,以比较暴露因素对从入组到疾病发病时间以及从诊断到死亡时间的影响。

相似文献

1
Methodological considerations for disentangling a risk factor's influence on disease incidence versus postdiagnosis survival: The example of obesity and breast and colorectal cancer mortality in the Women's Health Initiative.解析风险因素对疾病发病率与诊断后生存率影响的方法学考量:以女性健康倡议中的肥胖与乳腺癌及结直肠癌死亡率为例
Int J Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;141(11):2281-2290. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30931. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Overweight, Obesity, and Postmenopausal Invasive Breast Cancer Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials.超重、肥胖与绝经后浸润性乳腺癌风险:妇女健康倡议随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Aug;1(5):611-21. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1546.
3
Association of Prediagnostic Frailty, Change in Frailty Status, and Mortality After Cancer Diagnosis in the Women's Health Initiative.癌症诊断前后预测性脆弱、脆弱状态变化与死亡率的相关性:妇女健康倡议研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2016747. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16747.
4
Chocolate Candy and Incident Invasive Cancer Risk in the Women's Health Initiative: An Observational Prospective Analysis.女性健康倡议中的巧克力糖果与侵袭性癌症风险:一项观察性前瞻性分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Feb;121(2):314-326.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Cardiometabolic risk factors and survival after cancer in the Women's Health Initiative.妇女健康倡议中的癌症后心血管代谢危险因素与生存。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 15;127(4):598-608. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33295. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
The Association of the C-Reactive Protein Inflammatory Biomarker with Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the Women's Health Initiative.C反应蛋白炎症生物标志物与女性健康倡议中乳腺癌发病率和死亡率的关联
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):1100-1106. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1005. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Insulin resistance and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative.绝经后妇女中胰岛素抵抗与乳腺癌发病和死亡的关系:妇女健康倡议研究。
Cancer. 2020 Aug 15;126(16):3638-3647. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33002. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Body Mass Index and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Asia.体质指数与亚洲人群结直肠癌发病与死亡风险的关系
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429494. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29494.
9
Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial.去子宫后妇女用结合型马雌激素与乳腺癌发生率和死亡率:妇女健康倡议随机安慰剂对照试验的延长随访。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):476-86. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70075-X. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
10
Cumulative exposure to premenopausal obesity and risk of postmenopausal cancer: A population-based study in Icelandic women.绝经前肥胖的累积暴露与绝经后癌症风险:冰岛女性的基于人群研究。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Aug 1;147(3):793-802. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32805. Epub 2019 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Collider Bias Is an Insufficient Explanation for the Inverse Obesity Paradox in Prostate Cancer.对撞机偏倚并非前列腺癌中肥胖悖论相反现象的充分解释。
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(8):e70871. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70871.
2
Colorectal cancer patients' outcome in correlation with dietary and nutritional status: a systematic review.结直肠癌患者的预后与饮食和营养状况的相关性:系统评价。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2281662. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2281662. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Body mass index, triglyceride-glucose index, and prostate cancer death: a mediation analysis in eight European cohorts.

本文引用的文献

1
The 'obesity paradox' may not be a paradox at all.“肥胖悖论”可能根本就不是一个悖论。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Aug;41(8):1162-1163. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.99. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
2
Asking Too Much of Epidemiologic Studies: The Problem of Collider Bias and the Obesity Paradox.对流行病学研究要求过高:对撞机偏倚问题与肥胖悖论
Epidemiology. 2017 Sep;28(5):e47-e49. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000693.
3
Re: Collider Bias Is Only a Partial Explanation for the Obesity Paradox.关于:对撞机偏差只是肥胖悖论的部分解释。
体重指数、甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与前列腺癌死亡:八项欧洲队列的中介分析。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Feb;130(2):308-316. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02526-1. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
A comparison of analytic approaches for investigating the obesity paradox in kidney cancer.比较分析方法研究肾癌患者肥胖悖论
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Apr;34(4):361-370. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01670-6. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Recreational Physical Activity and Outcomes After Breast Cancer in Women at High Familial Risk.女性高家族乳腺癌风险者的休闲体力活动与结局。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Dec 8;5(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab090. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Obesity and cancer death in white and black adults: A prospective cohort study.白人和黑人成年人的肥胖与癌症死亡:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Dec;29(12):2119-2125. doi: 10.1002/oby.23290. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
7
Obesity and Cancer Risk in White and Black Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.白人和黑人成年人的肥胖与癌症风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Jun;29(6):960-965. doi: 10.1002/oby.23163.
8
Association between blood pressure and BMI with bladder cancer risk and mortality in 340,000 men in three Swedish cohorts.在三个瑞典队列的 340,000 名男性中,血压和 BMI 与膀胱癌风险和死亡率的关系。
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1431-1438. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3721. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
Physical Activity and Mortality in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症幸存者的体力活动与死亡率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Oct 17;4(1):pkz080. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz080. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Low-fat dietary pattern and global cognitive function: Exploratory analyses of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized Dietary Modification trial.低脂饮食模式与整体认知功能:女性健康倡议(WHI)随机饮食调整试验的探索性分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jan 8;18:100240. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.100240. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Epidemiology. 2017 Sep;28(5):e43-e45. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000691.
4
Obesity and Breast Cancer Prognosis: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities.肥胖与乳腺癌预后:证据、挑战与机遇。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec 10;34(35):4203-4216. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.4480. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
5
Physical Activity Level and Colorectal Cancer Mortality.身体活动水平与结直肠癌死亡率
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016 Oct;28(7):638-647. doi: 10.1177/1010539516661761. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
6
The Obesity Paradox in Cancer: a Review.癌症中的肥胖悖论:综述
Curr Oncol Rep. 2016 Sep;18(9):56. doi: 10.1007/s11912-016-0539-4.
7
A prospective study of dietary patterns and cancer mortality among Blacks and Whites in the REGARDS cohort.REGARDS队列中黑人和白人饮食模式与癌症死亡率的前瞻性研究。
Int J Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;139(10):2221-31. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30287. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
Body Mass Index and Cancer Mortality Among Korean Older Middle-Aged Men: A Prospective Cohort Study.韩国中老年男性的体重指数与癌症死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(21):e3684. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003684.
9
Analysis of Body Mass Index and Mortality in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Using Causal Diagrams.利用因果关系图分析结直肠癌患者的体重指数与死亡率。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;2(9):1137-45. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0732.
10
Collider Bias Is Only a Partial Explanation for the Obesity Paradox.对撞机偏差只是肥胖悖论的部分解释。
Epidemiology. 2016 Jul;27(4):525-30. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000493.